- 1,762
- London
- haroldinho41
Unfortunately not... Would have been nice to have been suprised though don't you agree?
What were you expecting?
Unfortunately not... Would have been nice to have been suprised though don't you agree?
So you are disappointed about how the first ever public demo of GT6 has turned out (nevermind the possibility of many changes when it becomes the full game) I think you're asking abit much, that or seem abit too quick to react negatively.
What were you expecting?
I'm talking just about this one video... It's the first time I have been disappointed since the announcement.
How am asking for too much??
I don't remember asking for anything.
Wasn't expecting anything. However what I got is disappointing.
I'm talking just about this one video... It's the first time I have been disappointed since the announcement.
How am asking for too much??
I don't remember asking for anything.
I think it would be a lot more realistic not to expect so much out of a demo.
I was disappointed with this video because alot of my pet hates from GT5 clearly remain.To clarify, are you disappointed with the lack of new content in the video, or what GT6 is shaping up to be?
This. Since when does demos are expected to have lots of content? Seriously?
It seems the game has gotten a healthy injection of much warmer lighting. It does look better, but not enough for my mind to be blown; whatever that means.
E3 needs to let a big cat out of the bag. For me, GT6 cannot just be GT5 with warmer lighting, new premiums and a few added tracks and some buffered standards....
There needs to be well developed features that divert from GT5's boring ways....paint chips, I'm looking at you. A-spec, I'm talking to you. Online-play, I am referring to you. Limited customization, I am especially talking to you.
So what if it has a car from 2008? All the videos so far have had rolling starts so I don't know why you mentioned it as if it was something new.
Where does it say that I said it should have lots of content?
You can't just make stuff up people.
Did I say you said that. I'm saying demos shouldn't be expected to have lots of content. And who is making up what?
Let's not go round in circles here
I don't think GT4 had any very special difference in graphics over GT3. Why some people are expecting something like the second coming of baby Jesus in graphics?
I'm happy to see they are working on it, we got better shadows, better lighting, better smoke, everything is smoothier and honestly right now looks good enough for me. We even got lights on the tunnel
Now what I am really interested in, like CorvetteConquer said: features. Aspec, Customization, etc...
Yep, even the clouds are in the same place.I like the improvements, but they could have changed at least a little bit of the track environment after GT5. Reposition a few boundaries, move a grandstand, add one of those interesting billboards from GT3... Anything to differentiate GT5 from GT6. It looks like it's been directly carried over from the old game, with improved lighting.
A grid start would have been new
It's not just graphics quality, it's just that the whole thing look like it could be GT5. That isn't how you show off a new game. The Silverstone w/ new cars was good but this and Autumg Ring, it's too similar.
Yet you mentioned you were only dissapointed with this video because it had none.
It's not just graphics quality, it's just that the whole thing look like it could be GT5. That isn't how you show off a new game. The Silverstone w/ new cars was good but this and Autumg Ring, it's too similar.
Yeah, What's your point???
You mention serious issues here.Yep, even the clouds are in the same place.
I mentioned a fact. Whether you think it's a serious one or not is entirely up to you.dr_slumpYou mention serious issues here.
I mentioned a fact. Whether you think it's a serious one or not is entirely up to you.
You mention serious issues here.