I must say since moving to a wheel and rig a few years ago playing racing games online is like a new a whole new world & game to me and I do really enjoy playing online. 90% of my time on GT7 is in the online modeWe are around a similar age and for me it's totally opposite. The fact we didn't have online games growing up has me enjoying that now as much as possible, it's rare that I'll play a game without it being online. Simply because I missed out on that as a kid.
Wheras with single player modes I'm thinking why am I doing this again ... I did it years ago
Yes I know. And I'm working on it... 😆🍻And for you drivers always pushing Q times as a challenge I'm sitting at a 2:12.6**. Knock it off and have fun slinging that car around.
I can relate. I'm in my 50s now and grew up with the original GT on PS and also arcady games like F355 on Dreamcast. I did GT up to 5 and skipped sport but that was more because I skipped gaming full stop. I got back into GT7 only as we acquired a PS5 in the house (thanks son) and fell in love with it again. I would probably spend more time racing single player if GT7 had a better single player campaign/manufacturer races/races that took advantage of all cars/etc/etc... but it does not so I'm doing Sport. I realized I am pretty mediocre and I appear to have hit a plateau in my abilities but I keep with it. I think I am about 95% of where I should be to be competitive in my class (I nearly always QT in the mid/lower pack and struggle to get into the top 8 a lot). I have nearly every car now and have completed near all races but still have missions to work through. Just wish there was more variety..I think an age plays a big part in what you play too. Im just into my late 30s so my childhood was all about mega drives, N64, PS2… And obviously back then everything was offline games. Gran Turismo 3 was my first GT game and I loved the content. Would spend hours playing the game, and even did the Nordschleife 24 which took me about 7 days to complete and a PS2 that was left running for days. When PS3 came around with the online mode stuff I bought GT5 but never played it online as I just preferred the offline content. PS4 again I’d just play the solo stuff and I skipped GT Sport as when it was launched I was told it was heavily focused on online game play which at the time I still didn’t really like doing. GT7 was the first game that I’ve played online and is still the only game I play online. I play a few other games online but at most it’s only a few hours a week or less.
I think for me, been brough up in that era where offline was the normal is something that just carried over to today. I see a lot of the younger generation are the ones who religiously play online and don’t bother with the offline stuff on games.
If GT7 had the same grind like the older games did, I’d probably play offline more than I do online.
I kind of agree but do find the Silvia very drivable around Interlagos. That said, everyone will still be quicker than me..Not gonna lie, i'm so tired of the Silvia being dominant race after race ( i guess last week was een exception).
That's true, i've managed to do that in gr3 but in gr4 it's just so tough. So much fun cars just aren't competitive. Especially against a+ drivers.Just gives you more of an incentive to get good with a non-meta car. It can be done, for sure.
I think a lot of us here are of a similar age. I remember I was playing doom in "Lan parties" and quake and UT and then moved to online racing on things like GT Legends and GTR 2 but PC gaming back then was a labour of love figuring out IRQ port settings and almost zero plug and play...ah those days of racing. Had all the consoles as well but the original and 2 disc GT2 were my turning point.We are around a similar age and for me it's totally opposite. The fact we didn't have online games growing up has me enjoying that now as much as possible, it's rare that I'll play a game without it being online. Simply because I missed out on that as a kid.
Wheras with single player modes I'm thinking why am I doing this again ... I did it years ago
I’d be happy to see them mix around with all kinds of different cars and groups but one thing in your post to counter is calling the 512 incredibly difficult and then requesting Gr.1 and 2. Those are two good example categories where the difference between a decent player and a really good one becomes very, very apparent.I'd like to know why PD in all races A always uses undriveable cars. Driving the Ferrari 512 is incredibly difficult, it seems made on purpose to prevent people from having fun. Why not put a group 1 or 2 car, why not?
I'm with you man, I hate the street cars on street tires...unless there is tuning allowed. I prefer the battle to be between me and the track, not me and the car. But that being said, there is a large group of people that feel the exact opposite. And I think that is what PD is catering to in Race A. IMO Race C should see Group 1 and 2 WAAAAY more often then it does. Daytona last week should have been Group 1 or 2.I'd like to know why PD in all races A always uses undriveable cars. Driving the Ferrari 512 is incredibly difficult, it seems made on purpose to prevent people from having fun. Why not put a group 1 or 2 car, why not?
Race A used to be fun for me. One make "clubsport" races. Racing tyres and things like the scirroco at Brands etc it felt like a proper gateway "entry level" to competitive racing. Like "a path way" slower stuff competitively matched teaching you to drive and race for the points. Now it's just a whatever they feel like making it thing.I'm with you man, I hate the street cars on street tires...unless there is tuning allowed. I prefer the battle to be between me and the track, not me and the car. But that being said, there is a large group of people that feel the exact opposite. And I think that is what PD is catering to in Race A. IMO Race C should see Group 1 and 2 WAAAAY more often then it does. Daytona last week should have been Group 1 or 2.
I kind of agree and also don't. I agree that race A has had it fair share of hard to drive cars and I agree that my first outing with the 512 was not pretty. That said, this is an unranked event so it gives the racer a chance to race cars they may not otherwise chosen and also forces them to drive vehicles outside of their comfort zone. Overall I like the idea of A being an experimental race and feel it should have more classics/oddities in it that we might otherwise not race. It should also have tuner options in older cars as well (I love my 1970 tuner DS).I'd like to know why PD in all races A always uses undriveable cars. Driving the Ferrari 512 is incredibly difficult, it seems made on purpose to prevent people from having fun. Why not put a group 1 or 2 car, why not?
Skill issue lad.I'd like to know why PD in all races A always uses undriveable cars. Driving the Ferrari 512 is incredibly difficult, it seems made on purpose to prevent people from having fun. Why not put a group 1 or 2 car, why not?
59 years old but while you where playing single.plauer I was doing online on PC.I see a lot of the younger generation are the ones who religiously play online and don’t bother with the offline stuff on games.
Because a lot of people love the road cars, why shouldn't they have their cars too?I'd like to know why PD in all races A always uses undriveable cars. Driving the Ferrari 512 is incredibly difficult, it seems made on purpose to prevent people from having fun. Why not put a group 1 or 2 car, why not?
Those ideas would be fun but spread out an already small player base even more.I kind of agree and also don't. I agree that race A has had it fair share of hard to drive cars and I agree that my first outing with the 512 was not pretty. That said, this is an unranked event so it gives the racer a chance to race cars they may not otherwise chosen and also forces them to drive vehicles outside of their comfort zone. Overall I like the idea of A being an experimental race and feel it should have more classics/oddities in it that we might otherwise not race. It should also have tuner options in older cars as well (I love my 1970 tuner DS).
This will never happen but I wish PD would offer:
1) Classic Race (Varies on time period - could be cars prior to 1960, a certain one make classic, that kind of thing).
2) Tuner Race (classic to modern - again could be any car but best if a single make)
3) Sprint (varies between group 3/4 as it does now)
4) Pitstop/Grid start (varies between group 3/4 as it does now)
5) Extreme (Group 1/2 or weirder car combinations - prototypes with endurance/pit stops/longer races or even rally)
This would also be fun to have different race combinations such as a two part race championship where race 2 starts in reverse order of race 1 finish.
I'm sure others can come up with even better combinations.
Myself I'd keep current Daily Race A-C style. Then make a tuning daily race D, mostly with road cars. And then a longer Daily Race E, with 40-45 min race and 5 min quali. And race is either dynamic weather stuff or a race where you are forced to use at least 2 compounds of dry tires.I kind of agree and also don't. I agree that race A has had it fair share of hard to drive cars and I agree that my first outing with the 512 was not pretty. That said, this is an unranked event so it gives the racer a chance to race cars they may not otherwise chosen and also forces them to drive vehicles outside of their comfort zone. Overall I like the idea of A being an experimental race and feel it should have more classics/oddities in it that we might otherwise not race. It should also have tuner options in older cars as well (I love my 1970 tuner DS).
This will never happen but I wish PD would offer:
1) Classic Race (Varies on time period - could be cars prior to 1960, a certain one make classic, that kind of thing).
2) Tuner Race (classic to modern - again could be any car but best if a single make)
3) Sprint (varies between group 3/4 as it does now)
4) Pitstop/Grid start (varies between group 3/4 as it does now)
5) Extreme (Group 1/2 or weirder car combinations - prototypes with endurance/pit stops/longer races or even rally)
This would also be fun to have different race combinations such as a two part race championship where race 2 starts in reverse order of race 1 finish.
I'm sure others can come up with even better combinations.
Yes indeed, even in A-S lobbies.Race B is the dirtiest races I've seen in a while. Endless Silvia drivers ramming literally anyone in front of them.
I was actually surprised to get 2 clean races with decent starting positions straight away. Usually need to stick it out for three races in a row before I get one that’s fitting to my qt and get placed mid pack to start.Race B is the dirtiest races I've seen in a while. Endless Silvia drivers ramming literally anyone in front of them.
Also our video:
I’m willing to bet Race C in Asia is worse.Race B is the dirtiest races I've seen in a while. Endless Silvia drivers ramming literally anyone in front of them.
Yeah, I can't connect from Southern California.Ohno, the GT servers are offline.