- 3,925
- On the move
- SomePlayaDude
2.3 tons.
PAIN.
PAIN.
Overweight
2.3 tons.
PAIN.
and Is heavy as hell
Incidentally:
The reason it is so humongously heavy (slightly heavier than the equivalent Imperial and Sixty Special even though it was quite a bit smaller) is because it was a hugely overengineered unibody and everything else at the time was Body on Frame (perimeter for the Imperial, X-Frame and then perimeter for the Sixty Special).
Pfft. He was an actor made famous by being in bad movies about stupid people doing stupid things in fast cars, and he was killed in a car that was going fast when it crashed--I'm more surprised by the moon appearing in the sky night after night. But yeah, it's a lot like a presidential assassination...That would be like saying the Carrera GT would be famous for being the car in which Paul Walker was killed.
The Continental up through 1980 (but after 1969 when it switched to BoF) was built on the full size Ford LTD platform. It came as a two door and a sedan, and was Lincoln's traditional luxury car that competed with the de Ville but had the Town Car/Town Coupe trim level to compete with the Sixty Special.I'm still always a bit confused by the designations of the Continental Mark vs Lincoln Continental.
A big fat imposing braggart american car is seriously uncool by default. This is an upscale sedan analog to a redneck's pickup truck. It might be something else if I saw what others see in its styling, but I see the ungainly offspring of a 1950s refrigerator and a pontoon boat with a set of 1960s-style headlights grafted onto the nose.It doesn't matter dude. Land yatch 3 speed pushrod american car. Don't even try.
Based on what?braggart
Size and status. It's a car the POTUS rode in. I'm not comparing it to its competitors, I'm talking about huge full-size luxury sedans, period. They're all uncool by default.Based on what?
I never base my reasoning on buyers/owners. It's the car itself.Who buys what was by a wide margin the smallest and easily (and deliberately) the most conservatively styled car in a market segment to be a braggart?
Which it had neither of in particular abundance when it was new. Kennedy had one, and Kennedy was immeasurably cool at the time.Size and status.
The car itself was bragging about something by being the smallest and most conservatively styled luxury car on the market?I never base my reasoning on buyers/owners. It's the car itself.
I've always loved the '61-3 Imperials' headlights on pedestals, though I prefer the later two years for their more subdued fins. I know, sacrilege.
Once again, incredibly hard one, as it's 100% location dependent. In basically every city centre outside North America, it's terribly uncool, by the sheer size alone. The thing is, when not in tight place where simply fitting on a lane, or worse through the road, becomes an inconvenience in a car like this, it actually is very cool.
Once again, incredibly hard one, as it's 100% location dependent. In basically every city centre outside North America, it's terribly uncool, by the sheer size alone. The thing is, when not in tight place where simply fitting on a lane, or worse through the road, becomes an inconvenience in a car like this, it actually is very cool.
Posts like this are a load of bull.
I can navigate mine or my dad's pickup or his landbarge 1970 Bel Air (when it still was on the road) perfectly fine through narrow streets, and we have plenty of those in the Netherlands.
And look so goddamn cool doing it. And that's in a workhorse. Now imagine being goddamn cool in a landbarge like this, all that sixties style, just oozing out of it.
Come to think of it. I should have voted Sub Zero.
Seriously Uncool.
I love these things, but they are almost exclusively driven by old guys that bring it to a car show than proceed to yell at anyone that gets within 5 feet of the thing.