- 5,303
- Riverside, Ca
- GTP_Leonidae_MFT
Cool. Got to work on few of these, and the back seat arrangement is innovative for carrying large things. Buut, I would take Citroen C2 over this.
The Type R engine is included.
But would you take a Sunbird?Civics are cars that try to be sporty, but fail miserably. I'd take a Cadillac Cimarron before this.
These two guys, @Slash and I, were raised on American muscle and the feeling that its the best way to go. You better believe our opinions are heavily influenced by that fact.
As for how I vote on the Civic, I vote Uncool. It could be a Meh or a Cool, but the amount of riced out Civics I see on a weekly basis, it feels like if I vote higher than I did, it'd give the ricers an even more ricer attitude. That of which I already can't stand.
EDIT: There is more that I didn't say, I just chose to keep it out.
This generation? No. I won't even begin to say a good thing about the rocket ship, it's as uncool as uncool gets.
But, I'll give it a meh. Just because they at least tried something new and interesting.
snip
But would you take a Sunbird?
a light bar on the front.
What is pictured is the 2006-2008 version.
The 2009-2010 had a facelift done.
![]()
The car had one more facelift in 2011
![]()
I am getting the 2011 sports grill for mine.
Thing is some love the Trophy Cabinet(as it is known to owners) version
Yeah they finally figured it out in 2011... but it's still seriously uncool.
That is a very odd combination of words. "Cool"? Fair enough, whatever floats your boat. But I'm not sure I'd have justified it by telling everyone how awesome and practical the back seat is. And I certainly wouldn't put forward the Citroen C2 as an alternative, not least as it's in a completely different market segment.Cool. Got to work on few of these, and the back seat arrangement is innovative for carrying large things. Buut, I would take Citroen C2 over this.
I'm gonna step in and defend the old Civic's shifter here. It certainly looks a bit odd and the driving position was rather high, but I much prefer high-set shifters to low-set ones. It's within a palm's width of the wheel, which is great if you're really pressing on - my old Panda 100HP had a similar arrangement and it was great having the shifter a flick of the wrist away. In that respect it's more like a Miata or something - the driving position is different obviously, but the position of the steering wheel relative to the shifter is actually pretty similar - rather than reaching down between the seats for it.The city bus-esque driving position and control design, with the shifter that never wasn't awkward feeling even if it was smooth. At least in the Element you sat a lot higher so you could still reach down to the shifter. Note how if it wasn't for that public transit center stack, the interior would be comically nodescript.
Up until recently, I thought that's how they worked. I only learned it wasn't like that because they had some Japanese arcade racing game with that kind of shifter. Took some time to get used to, for sure, but it definitely makes more sense to me now.An automated manual in a Civic? Would be slightly better if it was used the right way. Pushing it forward to change up? That's just plain wrong.