Knelly
Seriously man, have you not read anything. I was happy enough with 5th place considering all the crap that came with Saturday night, even though I felt aggreived. I never made a fuss about it. I never complained or asked for anything to be reviewed and was happy enough to start getting ready for next week.
However, when you get penalised for something that was out of your control, as well as made out to be a filthy driver throughout the race in the summary, I'm not going to stand for that.
Simple point to be made is penalties or no penalties (Consistency). Bring them I gain, don't bring them, I maintain my 5th spot. Either way and I will let it lie, but I never pushed for others to be penalised until I was unfairly treated.
You were making the same amount of points as the fifth place finisher with the extra point that was being transferred from Mule to you as a
penalty to Mule, despite you being placed exactly where you should have rightfully finished: sixth, after Matty.
You weren't satisfied with fifth place points, and you raised holy hell about it right here in the thread for all to see.
You acted like you were a completely innocent bystander to a bunch of reckless idiots on four totally separate occasions, involving four separate drivers and a thick yellow line. Plus, you were the unfortunate victim of terrible brake-checking, as your first post about it made it seem. Your miscalculation on fuel was someone else's fault because you didn't take enough fuel to run a 32 lap stint under any or all possible remaining conditions (two cars or solo), and you should be gifted a spot on the podium because of the inconvenience bestowed upon you during the last 23 laps by everyone else on the track but yourself.
Seriously, that's how it comes across to me, and at least four others that have sent me a PM about this today.
No one is calling you a filthy, dirty driver. We're telling you that if you had chosen to be only slightly less aggressive for a period of about four total seconds, the first two wrecks wouldn't have happened. You were definitely being too aggressive in trying to make those two inside passes in the middle of the corner.
Those incidents didn't need to happen. You still had 23 more laps left to pass Furi. What was the reason that you just had to dive under him right then and there? If you had just let off the gas for a second or two so Furi could come back down, which you knew he was going to try to do, everything would have been fine, and you could have kept saving fuel for at least a little while longer.
You were an entire lap ahead of Litchi with only three laps left in the race when you two spun out. Plus, you and Litchi were all alone, so you could have definitely passed him anytime you wanted with one good slingshot draft on a straightaway. Again, what was the rush? At this point, you should have known you were going to be short on fuel and been in maximum fuel conservation mode any way.
Even if you had been less aggressive, and not wound up in those first two accidents, that still does not guarantee that a completely different accident, that was absolutely out of your control, wouldn't have happened and collected you. So, you still can't assume that you would have been able to make it to the end on your light fuel load that only would have worked in more fuel-saving conditions.
If you had stayed on the apron after pitting, you would have been much more likely to avoid Mule, and the Matty incident wouldn't have happened at all.
The reason Matty was placed ahead of you in the final standings is because your mistake (merging into traffic illegally was the primary cause of your damage) was absolutely the reason that he didn't finish ahead of you. Placing him in sixth would have been a punishment to him.
Mule felt like if he hadn't also made the exact same mistake (illegal merge out of pits) that triggered the first lap 100 wreck, you wouldn't have been in that situation with Matty. So Mule publicly admitted he was wrong, and volunteered a point to be taken from him and awarded to you to help make amends for your situation. That to me was more than a fair compromise for all parties involved, and is still the best option on the table, as far as I'm concerned.
We're reading what you say as you were 100% innocent on all accounts, and you're reading what we say as you were 100% at fault for everything, while neither statement is close to true, or even intended.
We all know the truth lies somewhere very much in between.