Hey Jerome, thanks for that and I see no errors at all so you can't be that rustyUpdated the leaderboard, its been a while so let me know if I made any errors 👍 as there are many new faces and more divisionsI've been sick as a dog the past 4 days (not swine flu haha) and I may give the TLD tune a go if I feel better this week.
hope you recover from your sickness soon 👍
Unfortunately i dont have the time to complete this weeks wrs and usually i do participate in events that require tuning and seem to remember finishing ahead of you in all of themYou didn't offend me, I forgot to add either asmilie in. But still, what's the harm in giving it a go? Take my tune.
👍
But did you do that with or without tuning?Unfortunately i dont have the time to complete this weeks wrs and usually i do participate in events that require tuning and seem to remember finishing ahead of you in all of them
(just curious) Because if you didn't tune, I imagine that you could be much faster. 
No i definetly tune my car there is no possibility i could do the same times with a standard tune. I just think that you dont get a realistic response from the changes to the tune you make. It actually says, for instance to be carefull how low you make your car because if set too low you will have no suspension travel,or spring settings in another case if set too stiff your tyres could have less contact with the road surface. I have seen in your tunes and other tunes posted (some with very quick times)minimum ride heights and very firm springs,for me with my expeirience i find a car performs better with suspension travel which means a balanced setting between firmness and ride height. But the game doesnt seem to recognise this.But did you do that with or without tuning?
Its great to see on the other hand people like yourself helping out by giving people without tuning knowledge unlike ourselves,a chance to try something that works for usTo Paulie.Sorry my quote was to PaulieNo i definetly tune my car there is no possibility i could do the same times with a standard tune. I just think that you dont get a realistic response from the changes to the tune you make. It actually says, for instance to be carefull how low you make your car because if set too low you will have no suspension travel,or spring settings in another case if set too stiff your tyres could have less contact with the road surface. I have seen in your tunes and other tunes posted (some with very quick times)minimum ride heights and very firm springs,for me with my expeirience i find a car performs better with suspension travel which means a balanced setting between firmness and ride height. But the game doesnt seem to recognise this.
No i definetly tune my car there is no possibility i could do the same times with a standard tune. I just think that you dont get a realistic response from the changes to the tune you make. It actually says, for instance to be carefull how low you make your car because if set too low you will have no suspension travel,or spring settings in another case if set too stiff your tyres could have less contact with the road surface. I have seen in your tunes and other tunes posted (some with very quick times)minimum ride heights and very firm springs,for me with my expeirience i find a car performs better with suspension travel which means a balanced setting between firmness and ride height. But the game doesnt seem to recognise this.
is not a finished product, I think it may just be dummy proof, most cars don't seem to be able to bottom out. (If you recall GT4 it was very easy to over-do your suspension and make it too stiff).
+1. I have noticed some cars dragging at higher speeds when set to low (mainly /Tuned models), but with most cars it's perfectly safe to drop it as far as possible. I suspect PD set minimum ride heights well above the real minimum.Given that GT5
I do remember that and that is a valid point.But GT5p is the game we are playing and thats why i dont like the tuning in it. It doesnt bottom out so just lower it all the way..Thats not how i think,and you sure as hell shouldnt get a faster car for doing that.Given that GT5
The difference i have noticed by having the ride height set too low is the tyre grip. Its just something i have noticed but listen to the tyre noise while cornering with suspension set too minimum,then try minus 12 minus 12 in the R35 GTR and tell me what you think. You have less grip i think and the tyre screech is differentCould also be that we mostly race smooth tracks. Some cars on Eiger make the wheel very violent at certain points. TBH, I'm not too sure what the effects of bottoming out would feel like in GT5.
I could be completely wrong though, and the changes are still indeed normally noticeable. (Not to mention that some things have the wrong effects, like front toe).I understand what your saying and like i said before thanks to you guys (tuners) for helping to elimenate those flaws in the game:tup:I will try that.👍 I may not notice the difference, but we'll see.👍 I also have the theory that apart from toe settings, the tuning has less effect on the car than it should, again due to it only being a demo, and to make it dummy proof.
Maybe this is an indication that there may be something beyond 'Pro' physics? 💡 I noticed that you can make some really extreme settings when using standard physics, and less so on Pro. Maybe GT5 will introduce a new physics setting ('sim'?)? All speculation of course (and nothing to do with WRS 27I also have the theory that apart from toe settings, the tuning has less effect on the car than it should, again due to it only being a demo, and to make it dummy proof.
)
