Lord Kacperov
(Banned)
- 468
- Isla Vista
- SennaFan1985
So the Enzo’s mirrors have been fixed. But does anyone know if the Enzo has also gotten a polygonal upgrade? It originally didn’t get one, and I love the Enzo.
PD hasn't bothered fixing the STI so I doubt it .So the Enzo’s mirrors have been fixed. But does anyone know if the Enzo has also gotten a polygonal upgrade? It originally didn’t get one, and I love the Enzo.
Well yeah, its a discussion about the comparisons between the iterations. Everyones bringing to the table with what they know, and what they're wondering about. You could do the same, or not, its up to you.So much guessing and speculating going on in this topic..
laughable that you'd say that, but totally expected. You're exaggerating, if anyone is. You're definitely right that these cars do look good, but in gameplay they seem to lose what you see in these scapes, to a degree. You've acknowledged as much in the past. If you pretend that the scapes represent 100% of the game, that might hold a little more weight.The "worst" GTS car still looks better than the best car of any other game.... you are quite exaggerating
laughable that you'd say that, but totally expected. You're exaggerating, if anyone is. You're definitely right that these cars do look good, but in gameplay they seem to lose what you see in these scapes, to a degree. You've acknowledged as much in the past. If you pretend that the scapes represent 100% of the game, that might hold a little more weight.
I didn't realize the mode that is vastly superior in its photomode compared to the rest of the game is that restricted, that's a shame.about 50% of my photos in this thread are from photomode ingame because in scape mode I can't move the camera as I want....
Yes, I know all games use a different LOD when in actual gameplay. GTS even does it as you have more than pointed that out before. Not only that, but we've seen our fair share of low LOD issues within GTS game models with issues like exhaust pipes, badges, rims, visible engines and what not, so that wouldn't necessarily make them perfect(hell, its even posted in this thread, not that many posts ago ). If anything, they're just as "perfect" as any other games LOD that they use during actual gameplay.moreover all the games ingame use semplified models... more semplified than the GTS one where the great part of the cars looks absolutely perfect ingame
The models that you see in the photo mode are the real ones, when you take them to the track you lose polygons, but the work is there, and that is the real difference@emula Would be better if we can see those models not just in Scapes but how it looks like in gameplay screenshots, together with comparison from GT6 so we can see and decide which advantage and disadvantage from both game. Also to make fair judgement against bias claim/nitpicking.
The models that you see in the photo mode are the real ones, when you take them to the track you lose polygons, but the work is there, and that is the real difference
@emula Would be better if we can see those models not just in Scapes but how it looks like in gameplay screenshots, together with comparison from GT6 so we can see and decide which advantage and disadvantage from both game. Also to make fair judgement against bias claim/nitpicking.
That's not 100% true , tesselated cars are of higher detaili gt6GT6 ingame uses models with more downgrade than GTS, so the difference would be even greater...
That's not 100% true , tesselated cars are of higher detaili gt6
Which has nothing to do with the point of the comparison. He's trying to get comparison of aspects in similar situations. Finding out exactly what was worse in GT6, and what is better in GTS is exactly the point. No need to keep beating around the bush because you're worried that gameplay comparisons might show GTS in an unfavorable light in some situations. All games have their issues, and even then, they aren't even that big of issues in the first place.GT6 ingame uses models with more downgrade than GTS, so the difference would be even greater...
Which has nothing to do with the point of the comparison. He's trying to get comparison of aspects in similar situations. Finding out exactly what was worse in GT6, and what is better in GTS is exactly the point. No need to keep beating around the bush because you're worried that gameplay comparisons might show GTS in an unfavorable light in some situations. All games have their issues, and even then, they aren't even that big of issues in the first place.
The GT looks beautiful. I wish it sounded as good as it looks, though. It just doesn't sound like a V8 in GTS. More like a supercharged V6 of l4.Ford GT 2006
What does that even mean? I'm not sure how that is in any way a reply to the comment. Try actually replying to what is said instead of making things up, and stop putting words in peoples mouths. Anything to beat around the bush and avoid the situation for you I guess.so using photomode in both games is not a fair comparison? mr ImaRobots Photomode Gallery | (FM7) (FH3) (FM6)
What does that even mean? I'm not sure how that is in any way a reply to the comment. Try actually replying to what is said instead of making things up, and stop putting words in peoples mouths. Anything to beat around the bush and avoid the situation for you I guess.
On top of that, what does my galleries for three different games have anything to do here? Your asinine replies never cease to amaze.
Oh no! You mean someone is interacting with you the way you interact with them?! Who would have thought. Way to keep avoiding the situation. Laughable, really. Laughable, but sad.your only purpose here is to make member war against me (like in all the other topic): Goodbye
tessellation works way better on GTS
in GT6 you can see horrible things
I'd say technically Forzavista models are more impressive as they have modelled hoods, trunks, doors, engines, boot space and all that jazz. Just feels more impressive that the rigid models in GTS with the same depth of modelling as last gen GT. Of course they could use a few more polys here and there, but having 700+ cars at that quality is remarkable. Sorry for being off-topic.
Which is odd to say the least, because if the interiors can look that good on game modes that use a lower LOD, than it would only look better in the scapes, had they allowed it.For me it's kind of hard to appreciate GT's models because you have to go through odd lengths to actually see what they've made. They touted interior pictures left and right on the run up of the release of the game, but outside of a race (which is kind of moot because the 'screenshots' were not in a race) you have to do odd things to actually see what they've made.
Tesselation doesn't exist in GT sport It did in the beta but was cut. I discovered the game swaps LOD when you pause .
tessellation works way better on GTS
in GT6 you can see horrible things
Where is your evidence for this? I don't think adaptive tessellation would be forcibly removed, that doesn't make sense.Tesselation doesn't exist in GT sport It did in the beta but was cut. I discovered the game swaps LOD when you pause .
Tesselation doesn't exist in GT sport It did in the beta but was cut. I discovered the game swaps LOD when you pause .
That is truly shocking. I did not notice this whilst playing it, am I stupid?
Where is your evidence for this? I don't think adaptive tessellation would be forcibly removed, that doesn't make sense.