Heterosexual or homosexual?

  • Thread starter Concept
  • 381 comments
  • 16,696 views

Choose.

  • Heterosexual

    Votes: 238 81.8%
  • Homosexual

    Votes: 15 5.2%
  • Supersexual

    Votes: 38 13.1%

  • Total voters
    291
Originally posted by milefile
That wasn't part of the question.

Everyone else answered it to so I gave my point of view. If you don't like it.. oh well its life. I don't think its right because of my connection with the Marines. They have a policy against Homosexuals so... I support it!
 
Wow. Not that I have anything against the military and those who serve at all - at all - but that's a pretty scary statement.
 
Yeah, well the Marines are different then any other branch. They have like their own world. You either follow their rules or bye bye!
 
Originally posted by HondaKid86
Hi, glad to meet ya. :P

PunkRock, it was nice to see your post in this thread... I once saw a post from you at the GTF that led me to believe that you might not have the most gay-friendly perspective, but that's obviously not the case. Go you!

Yes, I'm gay. *shocker*

You know, Adam, i used to be like that. I take it you're talking about the Harry Potter thingie? I'd take back those comments, but it's too late. And that GTP/GTF fiasco, too.

I wasn't exactly homophobic, but i wasn't wide opened to homosexuality either. When one of my friends and when my uncle "came out of the closet" i had to think, i had to mature. Why should i stop loving/caring for these individuals, now that i know their "secret"?

You realise things at one point in your life. Things that make you change your mind completely, that make you live differently.
 
Originally posted by Acid X
Hmm. Did you vote truthfully, M5, or are you trying to gain attention to yourself? :P

I'm of the opinion that this board is in desperate need of a scandal. Maybe I should impregnate somebody and not marry them - that'd send the pinch-faced churchgoers into a tailspin. Or are we off that term?
 
Originally posted by M5Power
I'm of the opinion that this board is in desperate need of a scandal. Maybe I should impregnate somebody and not marry them - that'd send the pinch-faced churchgoers into a tailspin. Or are we off that term?

which member of GTP do you plan to do this to? or just in general?
 
Originally posted by skylineGTR_guy
which member of GTP do you plan to do this to? or just in general?
rotfl.gif


In general, but I'm glad you asked this question because we all got to see vat_man use the word 'bags' in a context in which is makes no sense.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
rotfl.gif


In general, but I'm glad you asked this question because we all got to see vat_man use the word 'bags' in a context in which is makes no sense.

well I was just wondering which of the 4 female members of GTP would want you :odd:



:lol: j/k
 
Originally posted by skylineGTR_guy
well I was just wondering which of the 4 female members of GTP would want you :odd:

From what I hear two of them are under consenting age and one's married. So that's out the window, unless I wanted the GTP scandal to be my arrest and subsequent prosecution for sexual assault and statutory rape.
 
Originally posted by skylineGTR_guy
HAHAHA and the forth one is my friend and has a boyfriend....

honestly tho we wouldn't really mind if you got arrested. I need some drama :lol:

The fourth one is TATINEE. :odd:
 
Originally posted by M5Power
From what I hear two of them are under consenting age and one's married. So that's out the window, unless I wanted the GTP scandal to be my arrest and subsequent prosecution for sexual assault and statutory rape.

Statutory?
 
Originally posted by milefile
Statutory?

Having sex with somebody under consenting age. It's a completely uninforceable crime (similar to not having car insurance), but it's still a crime.

Unless you're asking me about my spelling of the word, in which case, I'll pound you to kingdom come.
 
Originally posted by milefile
Statutory implies the consent of a minor.:D

No, no. The statute is that you can't have sex with a minor. When you go against the statute, you're committing statutory rape - not rape in the technical sense (the penalties are often less harsh, too, especially if the minor testifies that it wasn't forced), but rape in the sense that you're violating the statute prohibiting the act.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
rotfl.gif


In general, but I'm glad you asked this question because we all got to see vat_man use the word 'bags' in a context in which is makes no sense.

You really have no handle on the concept that other countries might have differing slang to the US, do you?

What would the American equivalent be - 'Calling it'?
 
Originally posted by vat_man
You really have no handle on the concept that other countries might have differing slang to the US, do you?


:lol: I only said "we all got to see vat_man use the word 'bags' in a context in which is makes no sense" to provoke the true meaning, of which I'm still unsure. With that said, I don't even understand American slang.

Is the air/con broken at your office again, or are you moving in on Cobraboy's hating-me territory? Or maybe you didn't like my overall disdain for "Roadhouse" in the photography & graphics forum.

What would the American equivalent be - 'Calling it'?

I'm not sure, it depends what you're trying to say.
 
heterosexual.

i don't give a **** either way. i'd rather not hear about gay people at all, personally i can't see the appeal of it.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
:lol: I only said "we all got to see vat_man use the word 'bags' in a context in which is makes no sense" to provoke the true meaning, of which I'm still unsure. With that said, I don't even understand American slang.

Is the air/con broken at your office again, or are you moving in on Cobraboy's hating-me territory? Or maybe you didn't like my overall disdain for "Roadhouse" in the photography & graphics forum.

I'm not sure, it depends what you're trying to say. [/B]

It did come off a bit grumpy, but given you've completely misunderstood some other refererences I've given before, not without some justification.

Re 'the Roadhouse' - hard to think of something I could care less about.

Re the meaning - imagine two children running to be the first to sit in the front seat of the car. One of the children shouts out 'Bags the front seat' to stake an imagined reservation for the seat, or in your parlance 'I call the front seat'. In the context I gave the comment above, I was making the first reservation to be a GTP member not impregnated (a very worthy cause, I'm sure all will agree).
 
Originally posted by vat_man
It did come off a bit grumpy, but given you've completely misunderstood some other refererences I've given before, not without some justification.


I know - my mentioning unfamiliar phrases is similar to a normal person asking 'what does that mean?' I just have a roundabout way of doing it.

Re 'the Roadhouse' - hard to think of something I could care less about.

If you saw it, you'd agree with me. Patrick Swayze is, as usual, horrible, and the writing is terrible, at the very best.

Re the meaning - imagine two children running to be the first to sit in the front seat of the car. One of the children shouts out 'Bags the front seat' to stake an imagined reservation for the seat, or in your parlance 'I call the front seat'. In the context I gave the comment above, I was making the first reservation to be a GTP member not impregnated (a very worthy cause, I'm sure all will agree).

Understood, though 'calling it' means one and only, whereas 'bags' seems to imply one of many.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
If you saw it, you'd agree with me. Patrick Swayze is, as usual, horrible, and the writing is terrible, at the very best.
[/B]

Oh - I didn't realise you were talking about THAT abomination. Definitely with you on that one.
 
Originally posted by vat_man
Okay - bad example. Imagine you were both going for the first piece of a cake.
In that case, it'd probably be a simple exchange of pleasantries:

"You can have the last piece."
"No, you can have it if you want."
"No, I insist."
"Oh, no - take it, it's yours."
 
Originally posted by M5Power
In that case, it'd probably be a simple exchange of pleasantries:

"You can have the last piece."
"No, you can have it if you want."
"No, I insist."
"Oh, no - take it, it's yours."

Yup - and you'd be booking ski trips in Hell the same day that happened.

More accurately, it'd be:
"I want it!"
"No - it's mine'
<sounds of wresting and fighting, then of a piece of cake falling on the floor. A few seconds of aghast silence, and then further sounds of wrestling and fighting, possibly accompanied by a pet eating>
 
Back