- 7,436
- Canada
- photonrider
@ jtl46 Great work, John! I see you initiate beautiful realities. Kudos.
![LOL :lol: :lol:](/wp-content/themes/gtp16/images/smilies/lol.svg?v=3)
Amazing work, maestros!
In fact, the real real cars look a lot worse than the . . . um, real cars. Pictures of diecasts are always hugely blown-up as compared to the real car's size - so under that magnification a huge number of flaws appear. This is why macro diorama photography uses a lot of judicious blurring.
Or . . . if you want it on a silver salver - 'bokeh'.![Wink ;) ;)](/wp-content/themes/gtp16/images/smilies/wink.svg?v=3)
I would imagine you guy's cars look absolutely like little Faberge eggs IRL.![Dopey :dopey: :dopey:](/wp-content/themes/gtp16/images/smilies/dopey.svg?v=3)
Well, best of luck to all who entered; dang, there was a lot of work put in there - and may the best man win.
If you lose - sell the car! Make another one.![LOL :lol: :lol:](/wp-content/themes/gtp16/images/smilies/lol.svg?v=3)
Amazing work, maestros!
Nice M3 guys!!!!, a picture will never look as good as the real car
In fact, the real real cars look a lot worse than the . . . um, real cars. Pictures of diecasts are always hugely blown-up as compared to the real car's size - so under that magnification a huge number of flaws appear. This is why macro diorama photography uses a lot of judicious blurring.
Or . . . if you want it on a silver salver - 'bokeh'.
I would imagine you guy's cars look absolutely like little Faberge eggs IRL.
Well, best of luck to all who entered; dang, there was a lot of work put in there - and may the best man win.
If you lose - sell the car! Make another one.