i'd find it completely and utterly stupid.![]()
+1As long as they keep the specs realistic I wouldn't mind.
I must partially disagree with you on this one. It may be utterly pointless and stupid, but it's the kind of utter and pointless stupidity that people can't help but love.I'd find it completely and utterly stupid.![]()
include the 1966 ver. Batmobile(Adam West), KITT/3000(without abilities) or The Interceptor/Pursuit Special(Mad Max/Mad Max 2) in GT5 as prize cars.
btw, the awesome tribute to Initial D in GT3 is what got me on this đź‘Ť
Of course. But I would still get it and tune it.I'd find it completely and utterly stupid.![]()
There was no Initial D car in GT3.include the 1966 ver. Batmobile(Adam West), KITT/3000(without abilities) or The Interceptor/Pursuit Special(Mad Max/Mad Max 2) in GT5 as prize cars.
btw, the awesome tribute to Initial D in GT3 is what got me on this đź‘Ť
No, unless they include the car from "The Flintstones".
Just give me Han's RX-7 in Tokyo Drift and I'll be happy.![]()
![]()
+1
give us all the cars from that fast &furious
runs away from possible flaming.
VWL V5.57. Movie Cars - Movie cars that are MECHANICALLY altered (like the ones from Tokyo Drift) for performance purposes are ok, but SHOW PROOF if they are legit. If its just for looks only, then don't bother. Plus no outlandish and stupid cars like the Munster Car, Chitty-Chitty Bang-Bang, and Lightning McQueen. But famous Manga-based cars (like in Initial D, Over Rev, and Wangan Midnight) that resembles in real-life cars are also applicable with the same rules.
include the 1966 ver. Batmobile(Adam West), KITT/3000(without abilities) or The Interceptor/Pursuit Special(Mad Max/Mad Max 2) in GT5 as prize cars.
btw, the awesome tribute to Initial D in GT3 is what got me on this đź‘Ť