Yeah...I'd like to apologise for this. I don't understand what it does because I press it and nothing happens. I also press it and then press Quote and nothing happens differently. In other words HELP!!
Yeah, it's not entirely clear at first. Click the button, when the green symbol shows up, it's worked, and continue clicking on however many posts you plan on responding to. Then on the last one, just click the regular quote button (even if you've already hit the multi-quote on that post). It should work alright, though tabbed browsing can play havoc if you're trying to deal with more than one thread at a time
.
Really? I mean I'm surprised because it's not only Fuji that has flowers. Would have thought that a normal modeller within PD would be doing that, not a specific person employed to do that. Unless you mean it's outsourced.
No no, not outsourced, and I doubt they have a particular modeler with the title "flower modeler"
. I just meant that since Prologue, they've updated the track, and someone deemed it necessary to include dandelions on the side of the track that react realistically when cars go by. I just find that wholly unnecessary... except that I keep forgetting GT is quite heavily biased towards eye candy.
Yeah...absolutely. I'm sure that if PD had additional time (perish the thought) to create a livery editor on-par with, say, Forza he would give it the green light because it offers players a fantastic creative experience.
Almost six years between games isn't enough?
I was specifically talking about the quality of the user created content, not the theme of the content. For example I'd do a search for decals and it recovers 000's of results. You have to scroll down many, many pages before you get to anything of note.
I don't think it's because good quality stuff doesn't exists but I do think that the structure could be improved to promote high-end creations done with heart and soul. Even the simplest of logo's can look pretty bad.
I suppose that's another facet of a livery editor PD would need to think about.
Hm, true. A simple rating system (out of five stars or something) would separate the wheat from the chaff, provided search results could be sorted by rating. Another solution (though more a work-around)... we are on the biggest unofficial GT forum out there, surely you'd hear/see the quality paintjobs just because they'd come up here pretty often. This community seems capable of finding
anything .
Sorry fella, I don't follow. I implied that you can buy a stock version of a car that doesn't have liveries already on them. PD tuned versions might have simple/repeat liveries to signify it's not a stock version.
Yeah, I got what you implied, and that was my major criticism; if I want a non-stock version, I'm stuck with it's looks. Sure, I like the RX-8 LM's 787B-inspired paintjob, but I'd love to be able to make it look how I want it to.
Want a good example of what I mean about a livery editor? Just Google Image Search "Spec Miata". Some guys on the board I frequent did a series in FM3 simulating that, and it was cool that they all had the number boxes and then their own little liveries. I'll never argue that some of the nasty liveries out there might actually lessen the feeling of immersion, but for this, it just added to it, the replays really did feel like watching a Spec Miata race. In GT5, without a livery editor, it just won't look quite the same.
To be fair it would have been nice to at least have the ability to stamp manufacturer decals on to your car.
It would be... and some basic shapes... and the ability to export the image to my PC to work on and then back to PS3...
.
I don't think I've seen that 300SL but please don't confuse the attributes that defines the experience with an ability to design liveries. I don't think that's at all fair. That's why I said that. You could have the best livery editor in the world but if the game is flat as a pancake it's not going to help.
Hmm, I still think it's fair, though. People talk about the lack of livery editor like they know Kaz personally would rather it not be in there, on some mistaken idea that he prefers the "purity" of not having liveries. But he has no problems foisting his own ideas of liveries on people, so it's an odd double-standard to assume. The SL is the easiest example for me because it was almost universally disliked when unveiled on here.
And the thing is; I don't think anybody remotely sane will call GT "flat as a pancake". It's going to be huge. A livery editor would do nothing but compliment that
.
I'm still trying to figure out why any of you would want fewer features in the game. Especially when it's something that a lot of other games have. "Because it's GT and GT doesn't need it" isn't an excuse.
It's the easiest way for a certain type of member around here to justify a feature not being included in the game.
How about interior damage? Already been done? I'm not sure.
Have we seen that yet? Honest question, I may have missed it in this scramble with the newly discovered demo. Either way though... notice how that's the only "new feature" we can really come up with?
