- 11,639
- Intercourse, PA
- Carbonox
Speaking of Japan, despite the small numbers even they've had a gang rape already.
But what are the "extremes"?
Or are rape statistics (which again on this forum are being blamed almost solely on reporting methods despite evidence to the contrary) and conclusions drawn on them "extreme"?
Immigrant = rapist would be extreme...if anyone was saying that. Immigrant = higher chance of being rapist, if true, would be a statistic worth discussing.By extremes I mean far right parties/rethoric.
Well there's certainly a strong willingness to ignore the reporting methods and differences in definition by a lot of people. Instead puttingg the blame squarely on immigrants/refugees. The immigrant = rapist narrative is certainly extreme in my opinion.
Immigrant = rapist would be extreme...if anyone was saying that. Immigrant = higher chance of being rapist, if true, would be a statistic worth discussing.
I don't think the future is bleak as long as we can avoid the extremes.
You were on to something until you explained what you meant.By extremes I mean far right parties/rethoric.
Ask around in every major city in Europe and you'll probably get the same response. Go figure where we are...![]()
Maybe elections the 15th of March are going to change something?
You were on to something until you explained what you meant.
The extremes in both directions offer utter nonsense. It's dangerous to not call out either of them, it's even more dangerous to only call out one of them. We could maybe call the former a soft implied validation for both sides, and the latter a hard implied validation for the side not outed. Not good.
Right. So no one said it but if you throw out a dubious "association" it'll conform your bias enough for you to proceed as if they did.Maybe not outright, but there's plenty of associating being done.
I think the main difference between the two extremes is their primary means of killing innocent people. One extreme does most of the murdering in a very deliberate, systematic way. The other does it mostly by starving its own people, (oops!) though systematic murder of millions is still on the menu.I agree that extremes on both are bad. I just think far right extremism is worse. It certainly seems so in Sweden at least. I didn't want to equate them. Maybe I should have for clarity
.
But like I said, there's more nuance now. More middle ground in the public discourse in Sweden. There's not just the extreme voices anymore. I think it bodes well for the future.
Right. So no one said it but if you throw out a dubious "association" it'll conform your bias enough for you to proceed as if they did.
I think the main difference between the two extremes is their primary means of killing innocent people. One extreme does most of the murdering in a very deliberate, systematic way. The other does it mostly by starving its own people, (oops!) though systematic murder of millions is still on the menu.
Yea the last time I was in Sweden, there wasn't too much genocide going on. But man was everything expensive.I speaking in the context of Sweden today. Nothing else.
Yea the last time I was in Sweden, there wasn't too much genocide going on...
Wasn't Germany the original source of fairytales? Or Scotland?Germany to finally start checking asylum seekers' phones for identification purposes:
https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d6b7a4d77596a4d/share_p.html?t=1487663536411
Amazing that they never thought to do that before. I wonder how many fairytales have already been taken for granted because their papers were oh-so-conveniently lost at sea and no other identification methods have been possible.![]()
Brings a whole new meaning to the expression 'phoney identification'....Germany to finally start checking asylum seekers' phones for identification purposes:
https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d6b7a4d77596a4d/share_p.html?t=1487663536411
Wasn't Germany the original source of fairytales? Or Scotland?
Germany to finally start checking asylum seekers' phones for identification purposes:
https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d6b7a4d77596a4d/share_p.html?t=1487663536411
Amazing that they never thought to do that before.
Brings a whole new meaning to the expression 'phoney identification'....![]()
Well, let's see here. Maybe no one read these.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4248492/Family-Iraqi-asylum-seekers-gang-raped-drunk-woman.html#article-4248492
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.3973831?client=ms-android-bell-ca
Then they say that they shouldn't have used Syrian refugee in the report.
Ok,we let you and your family into our country, we paid to fly your family here,we fed you, clothed you,gave you shelter. This is his response for our kindness? Molest little girls,you sick 🤬 Go to trial,when your convicted, your going back to your country. 🤬 you,we don't need that in Canada. I hope they shoot your sorry ass when you get off the plane, or a nice Canadian convict takes care of you in jail. They don't like child molesters in jail over here!
Now we have them coming over the border because of America cracking down on illegals. They are going to freeze to death or get shot by a farmer.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/canada/expect-more-illegal-border-crossings-in-spring-lawyer-1.3294512
...and then we get into a rant, you hope they are shot (and by implication killed) or attacked (and by implication raped).
Murder and rape still aren't okay just because you've authorised the perpetrators from people you consider natural lawgivers.
Yup, that's a crime that happened, although the article seems to suggest some element of force. See the coverage of the Ched Evans case for where the "rape" line gets really really murky after alcohol.
I agree with you, the facts should have been reported. That's especially true with the USA having so much sex crime already - in the 2006 stats 300,000 women of college age were raped. The USA can't afford to let a single person in from anywhere until they clear that mess up.
...and then we get into a rant, you hope they are shot (and by implication killed) or attacked (and by implication raped).
Murder and rape still aren't okay just because you've authorised the perpetrators from people you consider natural lawgivers.