So I assume from your sarcastic tone that you are seeming to claim that this kind of thing doesn't happen with etnic Swedes and is a modern, immigrant lead situation.
So while cooking dinner I did a big of basic research, this should of course have been an almost impossible task, given your assertions.
Imagine my horror to find that not only is it not new, but some of the biggest culprits seem to be ethnic Swedes!
Now I dismissed the Black Metal trend across Scandinavia (which includes Sweden) for church burning, murder, suicide and organised violence as far too minor.
I moved instead to looking at organised crime. Now while ethnic organised criminal gangs most certainly do exists (and I've never claimed otherwise) they are certainly not the instigators of the trend, nor are the close to being the largest (quite minor players currently) or the most violent.
Sweden's biggest problem appears to actually be an import from the US, with criminal biker gangs at the forefront it. Killings, drug dealing, extortion, armed robbery and the like were just the start. Rivalry's lead to a full scale war between the Bandidos and Hell's Angels (and affiliated gangs) right across the Nordic region (not the first one, that was in the '80s and lasted 2 and a half years). The result of the second war lasted from 1993 to 1997 and included shootings, ,car bombings, grenade attacks and the use of anti-tank missiles (stolen from the Swedish army).
While the war ended in '97 both gangs still exist and are still active in Sweden, and are currently involved in conflicts with some of the newer arrivals.
We also should give a shout out to 'The Brotherhood', who started as an ethnic Swedish prison gang, who during one riot took over and burned down a significant part of a prison. They soon moved to operating outside prisons and are currently the largest criminal gang in Sweden, responsible for a wide range of violent criminal activity.
As such to infer that violent criminal activity in Sweden, including the use of military weaponry is something brought in by the recent wave of immigrants is to be either massively biased or unwilling to actually carry out any independent research and simply believe the echo-chamber of bias that are the source of such claims.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Nordic_Biker_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brödraskapet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organized_crime_in_Sweden
So a story that firstly conflates two attacks that have no proven link with you seeming to suggest that Muslims can't be subject to mental illness?
Odd to say the least, but then given the nature of the source I expect nothing less.
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/features/breitbart/breitbart-report-2017-03.pdf
You seriously need that explaining to you?
OK.
The first story references Muslims because it involves a country that has, of late, been in the news quite a bit for putting in place a travel ban from majority Muslim countries and also stopped Muslims from other states travelling. Now if you have evidence that large numbers of people of other faiths have had similar issues or that majority Christian (or other faith) have been subject to a travel ban you would have a point. Do you have such evidence to demonstrate that the mention of the subjects faith was not relevant to the story?
The second story regards suspected child abuse, now I would go further and say that mentioning that he is even Indian is un-needed. Well that is unless you are able to show that being Indian or Muslim is a causal factor in being a potential child abuser?
What you and your source seem to be doing is conflating a persons religion with a crime, as such I would expect you to be able to support such a claim with some very, very robust data from an impartial source.
