Wardez, can you throw the standard Subaru into that test?
Exactly, I'll be switching if it gets nerfed alot.I'll ask you the same question a, spaz. The Lexus isn't fastest on the straight's or round the bends.
So what do you suggest?
Giving less hp will see the arta and rx7 dominate it, it would probably get hammered az the celica and subaru also.
Adding more weight will slow it down even more on the bends and push it further away from other cars.
The problem isn't the Lexus, it's a couple of other cars that need a power boost to even them up with the rest of the field.
Exactly, I'll be switching if it gets nerfed alot.
People just look at raw hp/weight figures it seems.
In fact my teammate was faster in the Garaiya on most tracks.
In a straight line with 404hp weirdly it's also even with the RX7 and only abit faster than the Garaiya. Top speed is also close. Keep in mind I run stock rear downforce.
In addition the Lexus has inherent mid corner understeer, quite push-loose.
The rear gets light on entry and you can enter with not much steering, then it pushes and you have to wait on it.
Braking and turn in/exit grip seem similar and lower speed response in the Lexus is good I have to say.
I'd love to test but have to wake up for class in 5 hours. Waking up at 6.30 for 2 hours and some damn pointless subject. :/
Exactly, I'll be switching if it gets nerfed alot.
People just look at raw hp/weight figures it seems.
In fact my teammate was faster in the Garaiya on most tracks.
In a straight line with 404hp weirdly it's also even with the RX7 and only abit faster than the Garaiya. Top speed is also close. Keep in mind I run stock rear downforce.
In addition the Lexus has inherent mid corner understeer, quite push-loose.
The rear gets light on entry and you can enter with not much steering, then it pushes and you have to wait on it.
Braking and turn in/exit grip seem similar and lower speed response in the Lexus is good I have to say.
It all comes down to the driver at the end of the day, i remember Litchi doing a test earlier in the thread with about 5 cars and all were within .3 of each other. Not sure which was fastest though.
It all comes down to the driver at the end of the day, i remember Litchi doing a test earlier in the thread with about 5 cars and all were within .3 of each other. Not sure which was fastest though.
Tracks also has to be taken into account, short low speed tracks don't suit the Lexus.
Next season we should have a more even spread of short, medium and long tracks.
Just done some testing with zach and the lexus isn't my fastest car around Laguna Seca but at next weeks race it was the fastest for me, maybe it does need a slight tweak but to much and it'll get had at the small tracks too easily.
If we do change the specs on the Lexus again, can we extend the final car selection from this Round maybe one or two more rounds?
The original idea from a few stewards was to have 394hp for the Lexus @1150kg. Seeing 1160kg did nothing to really hinder the corner speeds (ballast positioning helps), my idea of 394hp seems fine. The car has stage 3 engine, that gives it good torque, and still has more power than any car in the field. I think this will give the Lexus a bit less speed but won't hurt it in a way that it'll cause people to change their choice of car. Fast laps are cool, but continuing those laps throughout a stint is another thing. The Lexus is decent, but not the best on tire wear. IMO, the Garaiya and the RX7 are gentle to their tires in comparison. At Nurb I could go 4-6 laps longer and still be within 1-2 seconds of my fastest lap. With the Lexus, the fast laps come on early, but fade later on a bit quicker than the others I've driven at least.
VELOCI_2NRMaybe you're only looking at maxima/minima figures such as top speed and apex speeds.
The thing with the Lexus is it has gobs of grip. The chassis isnt as good as a Garaiya through the corners, but something closer to a premium subaru, which is still pretty good. The mid-corner push will lower your apex figures since you have to let off the gas to let the car rotate, but the loads of grip you have will allow you to get back on the throttle much sooner and use all the available power more instantaneously.
That gets us to our next area, power. The car has over 400 horses and a bajillion ft-lb of torque. It's also power limited to like 60%, iirc, so it gets all 400 horses all over the power band whereas most other cars get maybe a 2000 rpm window. This is what gives the car the amazing pull out of the corners and until about halfway down the long straight. Then the brick of a body it carries on the frame begins to fight a losing battle with the air and ultimately reaches a terminal velocity slower than if one of the more streamlined cars had a similar engine package. It may also be that because of the super limiting that's required on the car, it has no torque in the upper revs, so if you're trying to run the car to redline in 6th, it may be slower than only running it to 6500rpm in 6th.
Maybe we should try disallowing stage 3 engine to force less limiting and see if that slows the car down. Just a thought.
In the end, not all cars are going to run the same when it comes to top speed and apex speeds; it's the final lap time that really matters. And it's that lap time ceteris paribus that matters.