Irrelevant, not arguing.
Is it just me or does Famine have a secret dissatisfaction with the Space Shuttle?
Just like you saying I claimed something which I never stated, the space shuttle issue. A vague comment is all it is. The fact that the LFA is carbon fiber, and it's used on the Shuttle, and is apart of it's construction, means the shuttle is made of it, even if in part.
It's clearly an impressive car but it's as if Lexus plugged a bunch of numbers into a computer and out popped a supercar.
Enough that they had to hire someone else to do it?You must be confusing the LF-A with the Nissan GTR...
Listening to the LF-A's engine tells enough how much soul Toyota's people put into that thing.
You must be confusing the LF-A with the Nissan GTR...
Listening to the LF-A's engine tells enough how much soul Toyota's people put into that thing.
Enough that they had to hire someone else to do it?
Enough that they had to hire someone else to do it?
They didn't, Yamaha co-developed it.
The development behind the engine was, not the sound.They didn't, Yamaha co-developed it.
To perform this acoustic design, we viewed the engine as the generator of sound and the automobile as a medium for conveying sounds from one place to another. We then came up with an idea for how to achieve a smooth interaction between drivers and vehicles, and it was adopted.
Yamaha and Yamaha Motor proposed equipping the automobile with a composite sound conveyance device (note 3). This device maintains balance in the volume and frequencies of sound from the engine while effectively guiding sound radiated by the surge tank into the vehicles interior. Using this method directly passes on sound from the air intake while holding the volume of engine sound to a comfortable level. Furthermore, the driver can enjoy sound with a spatial quality that is an integral part of the vehicle.
That still doesn't answer how much work Toyota actually put into it. For all we know, Toyota could've just checked on it every now and again to see the progress it was making, and offering feedback, and because they have done that they could say that they co-developed it.
Drove this to compare to the real one:
real:
Stock car, oil changed & fully broken in (Sport Hards). ABS=0, tried to keep it as clean as possible. Didn't have full throttle on the long straight as I didn't want to overshoot the speed the real car did on it's 7'14.. (It seems I still got a little too much speed there, my bad)
Did one mistake and almost overshoot one corner, you might notice it. Stupid of me, I didnt watch the real lap close enough and see that the time is cut of a bit earlier than in GT. Still, I don't think I could do much better with these tires. If I'd want to do more exact replica of the lap, I'd need more sticky tyres.. with sport hards you need to push the car a little too much for the time to be comparable (so the look as far as grip goes doesn't match imo).
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2012/04/lexus-lfa-ii-rumors-twice-the-car-twice-the-price.htmlBased on that car’s success and Toyota’s newfound performance spirit under the leadership of CEO Akio Toyoda, Lexus is already preparing a successor that will be vastly more impressive in terms of performance. It will also be vastly more expensive.
Our well-connected source was informed by a senior Toyota executive who prefers to remain anonymous that plans for an LFA II are currently in the works. The new supercar has been described as twice the car, with a significantly higher performance level. To match that new performance, pricing will climb steeply, into the range of $800,000 to one million dollars.
Like the LFA it will be an exclusive product, but even more so than the original, with plans to produce just 100 units.
I have a better idea.
Make the LF-A their own brand, so they can avoid the pompous oh it's a Lexus thing. Make that ultra high end fetish model, while at the same time, take some of the the tech that made LF-A an engineers wet dream, downsize it, take the GT86 platform (I doubt Toyota and Subaru invested time and money just to use that platform for one car) change the dimensions a bit, and plop in the "mini" LFA in there.
The issue is what marque has a better reputation for selling cars like this though.I have a better idea.
Make the LF-A their own brand, so they can avoid the pompous oh it's a Lexus thing. Make that ultra high end fetish model, while at the same time, take some of the the tech that made LF-A an engineers wet dream, downsize it, take the GT86 platform (I doubt Toyota and Subaru invested time and money just to use that platform for one car) change the dimensions a bit, and plop in the "mini" LFA in there.
Try to stick around $100,000 mark.
I had way too much coffee.
Of course, but snickers from the Europeans are better than downright laughter if this had been released the other way.The branding is the issue.
Lexus was all about luxury without breaking bank. Now they rival the Europeans in options and anal attention to detail.
But trying to push a car with a price tag north of $500000 with a Lexus badge won't go without snickers from the European fanboy club.
Lexus must have serious buyers lined up when they made the announcement.
Million dollar Lexus?
Yeah. I don't think they can swing that.