The operative word here being 'modern'... alas there are other nations currently in the process of building nuclear reactors with plans sold to them in the 1970's on the back of fag packets, by despotic leaders who view themselves as Gods, with the same regard for safety as they have for their own citizens i.e. none.
That said, while the 'Pripyat Corollary' may not apply here (I think), that's not to say that this incident will not pose a whole raft of very serious problems in its own right i.e. the displacement of hundreds of thousands of civilians, the loss of swathes of valuable land, the cost and difficulty of permanently sealing off the crippled reactors (given their susceptibility to future quakes/tsunamis etc.), not to mention the imminent crisis that Japan faces if their nuclear plants have to be rebuilt or refurbished to make them (more) secure against future quakes. Even if the total radiation leak from this plant remains relatively low, the damage being done to the Japanese economy, not to mention to hundreds of thousands of people, is significant...
The Japanese reactors we are talking about are from the 1960's I heard.
I think it may be photoshoped, look at how the chairs on deck are still aranged correctly.What always amazes me is how intact the boat looks, as if the tsunami just gently deposited it there as a reminder of what it can do.
I think it may be photoshoped, look at how the chairs on deck are still aranged correctly.
Can't really tell anything...
I can assure you it's not....I think it may be photoshoped, look at how the chairs on deck are still aranged correctly.
Thank you, Famine.
I wish you and your family the best. As well as everybody in Japan right now
Guys I recommend you donate right now. Every little money makes a big difference.
http://american.redcross.org/site/P...&s_src=RSG000000000&s_subsrc=RCO_BigRedButton
I don't get how anyone can say this is "payback" for Pearl Harbour. A co-worker was ranting about it today and I was appalled. I don't care what nation you are from and what happens to a nation you may not like, this is a disaster against humanity just as all large scale disasters are. I don't get why we can't just help out fellow man in a time of need like this.
And really the Pacific Theatre of WWII along with Hiroshima and Nagasaki were payback for Pearl Harbour if you want to be technical about it.
I apologise for the bit of a rant, I'm not just really annoyed with people who say things degrading like this when a nation is in need.
... Just look at http://ignorantandonline.tumblr.com/ ...
That picture is ironic, as there is no such word as "foolness".Oh my god, the insane religious fanatic girl is unbelievable. Someone should call the nuthouse guys for her.
Thanks, man. I will attach this to the original post in this thread. 👍Definitely! I made a thread with infos on how different countries can donate to the Red Cross: https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=192654 Still looking for more infos by the way.
But the BBC at the same time are still showing on the BBC 24 news , the UK expert saying even with a reactor meltdown and explosion the risk is negligible. But they are maintaining high coverage of the nuclear issue.So, anyway, not content with relying on an anti-nuclear-power campaigner as their only source of information on the Fukushima issue, the BBC are now at the stage of making scaremongering crap up off the top of their heads:
Headline/text conflict...
So, anyway, not content with relying on an anti-nuclear-power campaigner as their only source of information on the Fukushima issue, the BBC are now at the stage of making scaremongering crap up off the top of their heads:
http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/4605/pssboil.jpg [ /img][/center]
Headline/text conflict...[/color][/b][/QUOTE]
"Off the top of their heads" isn't quite true, I mean, even the Japanese said themself "we had a meltdown", "a meltdown is likely", "maybe we had a meltdown" just to say 2 hours later "there wasn't one".
Of course not everything they write is completely true, but the BBC were also the first I've seen that reported the "hydrogen explosions" while all the other bigger channels were talking about the core itself.
The German TV channels are really horrible by the way.
But the BBC at the same time are still showing on the BBC 24 news , the UK expert saying even with a reactor meltdown and explosion the risk is negligible.
"Off the top of their heads" isn't quite true, I mean, even the Japanese said themself "we had a meltdown", "a meltdown is likely", "maybe we had a meltdown" just to say 2 hours later "there wasn't one".
Hm, whatever that means.#
2316: Kyodo now says that the suppression pool may have been damaged at the second reactor.
Slight exaggeration. There is an alert. There is a real risk of a meltdown. At a nuclear reactor. In Japan. I'm not seeing how it is cynical at all. Also, regarding the BBC, your assessment that John Large is 'their only source' is just wrong. The BBC have had several 'experts' on over the last few days, but are also citing many other sources including the IAEA, the Japanese government, various 'officials' from the plant, Japanese news networks, various international news agencies, and their own reporters who are on the scene...To report a story of "the IAEA says there are no signs of a meltdown" with the headline "MELTDOWN ALERT AT JAPAN REACTOR" is breathtakingly cynical.
I think he meant worst case if the containment failed. That linked report suggests no containment failure even as a worst case.That'd be UK expert John Large again?
I shall reiterate, read this if you think there's any possibility of the cores exploding.
To report a story of "the IAEA says there are no signs of a meltdown" with the headline "MELTDOWN ALERT AT JAPAN REACTOR" is breathtakingly cynical.
I gave up paying attention to the BBC for factual accuracy sometime in 2001.
#
2320: A spokesperson from Tokyo Electric says said some staff have been evacuated from the site.
... Just look at http://ignorantandonline.tumblr.com/ ...
That linked report suggests no containment failure even as a worst case.
"Beware the ides of March"
That's a poor weather warning for the UK.