Major explosion and shooting in Oslo

**** that this man doesn't deserve execution,or life in prison, he deserves to be tied down for the rest of his life with a tube rammed down his throat feeding him nutrients while he gets daily intense beating for the rest of his life. If they do choose execution let his head be put in a box with a bunch of hungry rats. ****ing people what has this world come to where **** like this is allowed to happen

I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels this. I don't think it's "allowed" to happen but the idiot deserves something. Being nice to him just makes me feel like an idiot. Execution doesn't help either cause he can just get out of the bad experience of jail. I'm not saying torture him, I mean it's best if they make him feel like an a**hole. For example putting him in display so the public can frown upon him... get the idea?
 
Last edited:
^ How about forcing Breivik to listen to a recital of the entire Qur'an?
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-15936276

Psychiatrists assessing self-confessed Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik have concluded that he is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia.

They believe he was in a psychotic state both during and after the twin attacks on 22 July that led to the deaths of 77 people and injured 151.

Their report must still be reviewed by a panel of forensic psychiatrists.

Breivik will still be tried in April but it seems likely he will be placed in psychiatric care rather than prison.
 
Just read it this morning and shook my head. They really bought it...criminals know how to abuse the system, sadly.
 
Mr. S
Just read it this morning and shook my head. They really bought it...criminals know how to abuse the system, sadly.

I personally think it's mostly down to a horribly set-up human rights system. Criminals know how to use their rights to their advantage, and in my opinion, avoid proper justice.
That's my opinion, anyway.
 
I personally think it's mostly down to a horribly set-up human rights system. Criminals know how to use their rights to their advantage, and in my opinion, avoid proper justice.
That's my opinion, anyway.

No, it's because regardless of circumstance you cannot trial someone who has been proven to be insane. You may call it a horribly set-up human rights system, I call it a fair trial (or not as the case may be).

I really don't think people understand the kind of hell pyshiatric (and secure) hospitals can be, they're not normal hospitals and it's hardly a safe haven, I'm surprised some people don't want them to go in to secure units. Peter Sutcliffe has been attacked 4-5 times in his various secure hospitals, being blinded in one attack, amongst many other examples. Although this insane Norwegian may never be proven guilty by a court of law of his horrific crimes, being deemed too insane to stand trial and never being allowed out of a secure unit isn't far off doing the same thing a trial would.
 
It does. I can still remember watching it live as I happened to be tuned in at that moment - though I'm usually tuned in most times.
But what of those victims now? Who remembers their names, except for those directly connected who may still have not forgotten the grief.
Yet, I bet, many can spell the name of the killer correctly, even now.
Getting attention is the new desease. Or is it isolation that is the real cancer in society?
 
I won't be surprised if he does an AMA on /pol/ or Voat.
 
I'm of the mind set that isolation is cruel and unusual punishment, it's the main reason I'm for the death penalty and imo he deserves to die and not be tortured.
 
I'm of the mind set that isolation is cruel and unusual punishment, it's the main reason I'm for the death penalty and imo he deserves to die and not be tortured.

I see both as decent options for this piece of ****. Death or torture. But now he has won this case, you can bet your ass that isolation is out of the question.
 
What, instant relief from the guilt? Nah, murder isn't the answer.

You're assuming he is feeling guilt, and I mean, genuine guilt.

-----------------

He stripped 77 humans of their lives, and he has the gall to complain about human rights because he's feeling a bit lonely... that get's under my skin, and presumably that was the intention. It's his way of saying "I'm still here".
 
In the US he would be in solitary confinement for his own safety. I don't know the kind of people you would find in a Norwegian prison, but here he wouldn't last long in general population.

After his Nazi salute in court he would have maybe 10 good minutes after the gangs realized who he is.
 
I see both as decent options for this piece of ****. Death or torture.

Doesn't really matter, he wins either way. The whole point of what he did was to get attention - "It's about sending a message", in Jokerspeak - which he got, and everything else is a bonus for him. I'd be willing to bet the reason for the court case was not because he's particularly bothered about being in isolation, but that he knew it would put him back in the news.

The only way to beat him would be to never talk about him again.
 
Roo
The only way to beat him would be to never talk about him again.

Putting him in solitary confinement till his death would greatly help that idea. Only open a door to give him food, shower 2-3 times a week and perhaps once every 6 months let him sniff up some outside air. He killed 77 people. He should not have any rights left.
 
While all of that might be true, what does it say about us? On another note, the expense, my dear I can only barely imagine the cost of keeping him around and all the trials and so forth.

Perhaps some think having him alive and in a spotlight of sorts is a reminder for the people and a deterrent for other like minds, I don't buy any of that however. It's something I've seen argued in the states.
 
Do you support the murder of Gaddafi? Just curious, I know it's a cross thread reference. Do you ever support murder at all?

No, I don't support that murder (hard to know what really happened during the chaos of that pick-up ride). There are very few occasions when I support the killing of a person and that's only when there's no clear, safe option to bring them to justice.
 
While all of that might be true, what does it say about us? On another note, the expense, my dear I can only barely imagine the cost of keeping him around and all the trials and so forth.

Perhaps some think having him alive and in a spotlight of sorts is a reminder for the people and a deterrent for other like minds, I don't buy any of that however. It's something I've seen argued in the states.

Seeing that there isn't a death sentence in Norway, or anywhere in Europe, I think, letting him rot in solitude is the best option.
If it was up to me he would be shot. Or hung. Or fried.
 
No, I don't support that murder (hard to know what really happened during the chaos of that pick-up ride). There are very few occasions when I support the killing of a person and that's only when there's no clear, safe option to bring them to justice.

Well I doubt anyone was going to be able to bring him to justice so...
 
If the the food is "worse than waterboarding", how can he prove his case that without actually having been waterboarded?

Being the empirical sort that we are, at least 77 years of it on Breivik ought to yield some concrete results.
 
After his slaughtering of 77 people, the nazi solute gesture, and now complaining about his rights, I honestly don't care about his suffering.
I rarely think torture should be used as a form of punishment, but this man deserves to be tortured, heck, I think he qualifies for waterboarding too.



Edit: I know it's illegal and will never happen, just my personal thoughts.
 
Last edited:
Back