- 24,640
- Anoka, MN
2) That I'm condoning what they did.
What are you doing than?
1) That the police had a good fifteen minutes to make a decision at the time.
Because that seems like you are...
Last edited:
2) That I'm condoning what they did.
1) That the police had a good fifteen minutes to make a decision at the time.
ZenithFor starters I can identify the difference between a Nissan Titan and a ****ing Toyota Tacoma...
And they failed to protect and serve the two innocent people that they shot.
Biggest manhunt in California history unfolding right now. The guy killed a cop already and is a trained ex-Navy sniper and expert shooter. He has a vendetta against the LAPD for firing him for reporting a fellow officer for using excessive force on someone they were arresting and for corruption in the department. He marked targets, almost a dozen different officers high up the chain in the LAPD and they all have security sentries following them everywhere.
I don't ever want to glorify the killing of anyone, let alone cops, as revenge. I don't even know what opinion I have on all this. Some people think it's vigilante work while others are calling him a crazed terrorist. I'm just saying this story is important and you should follow it. Two women were already harmed, being shot by officers thinking they were driving the suspect's car in LA, so be careful.
Here's a good timeline on the story so far:
http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/184570/detailed_timeline_background_updates_about_former/
He's sent a package to journalists at CNN before he started targeting officers with a commemorative coin he got during his service. It had three bullet holes in it with a taped message saying the following, "Thanks but no thanks Will Bratton (the police chief of the LAPD that was in service during Dorner's time as an officer),"
as well as,
"1 M.O.A." which is a reference to:
1 Minute of Angle, in shooting terms this means being accurate enough to shoot a one-inch group at 100 yards, which he demonstrated through the bullet ridden coin.
Here's his 10,000 word manifesto:
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/l...-Asians-Hispanics-and-Lesbians-190218051.html
Just head on over to NBC Los Angeles's website for local coverage:
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/
This is an epic story.
The truck isn't the issue here. The issue is that the police went against typical police training and had no legitimate reason to open fire. They ****ed up, you can't argue against that. This little debate right here is pathetic. They should be terminated immediately for acting upon a falsely identified suspect and charged with manslaughter if not murder because they at least thought they were doing right.Perhaps because you are operating under two faulty assumptions:
1) That the police had a good fifteen minutes to make a decision at the time.
2) That I'm condoning what they did.
Perhaps because you are operating under two faulty assumptions:
1) That the police had a good fifteen minutes to make a decision at the time.
Protect and serve is their goal.
....................... If they didn't have the time to make the proper decision to unload their weapons on the back of a car, they shouldn't have done it. That's all there is to it.
Cops have protocols to follow and the ones in question didn't follow it, resulting in unjustified deaths. Simple as that.
This is going to make a great movie ten years from now.
Trying to demonstrate that, however unjustified the officers' actions may have been, if you take away the uniform, you can understand why the person underneath reacted the way they did.What are you doing than?
They are, after all, human beings.
How many cop-killing killer cops have there been in recent years?they are the ones that are supposed to be able to cope with these situations in a rational matter
How many cop-killing killer cops have there been in recent years?
How many cop-killing killer cops have there been in recent years?
Police Chief Charlie Beck Thursday called the Torrance shooting a case of mistaken identity.
I don't know, maybe because it's never happened before, there's no procedure on how to handle it.What does that have to do with making rational decisions?![]()
And maybe the LAPD figured that, with the severity of the situation, they weren't going to put "two trigger happy idiots" in charge of protecting one of the people the suspect named as one of his targets.Maybe, just maybe these cops were two trigger happy idiots.
Do you know what the definition of "matches the description of the suspect's vehicle" actually is?Seems not too hard to differentiate these trucks even in low light, if the cops often do street patrol.
Do you want to see appalling behaviour?The fact you are sitting here trying to justify these actions is, honestly, appalling.
Yes, you read that right. There is currently a small group of Wikipedia users who are trying to hijack the article on the shootings and the article on the suspect and use them to portray him as some kind of folk hero by comparing him to Batman.His name is more notable than his crimes. Belongs on the List of serial killers in the United States.The guy's become an antihero, and this will only grow. He's not your common-or-garden ordinary criminal. He's intelligent, liberal (loves Obama, Piers Morgan and is pro anti-gun laws), has sympathetic issues, writes well, and is well informed. He's also about to be killed on sight. American to the core.
I don't know, maybe because it's never happened before, there's no procedure on how to handle it.
Do you know what the definition of "matches the description of the suspect's vehicle" actually is?
Two blocks away from where the women were shot, officers opened fire on a 38-year-old man driving to the beach to go surfing, according to his lawyer. No one was injured in the second shooting, which happened about 25 minutes after the first.