Except he just might be running, or already ran. He did after all try to hijack a boat.
He is
suspected of trying to hijack a boat.
Still does not change a thing, he's not targeting the general public, he's targeting police, ...... so let the police shoot innocent old ladies?
Where did I ever say that police were entitled to shoot innocent old ladies? You, Zenith, Justin and Azuremen have all been putting words into my mouth.
I simply said I understood why the police might have opened fire prematurely. They are faced with a fugitive who has promised to kill any police he finds through "unconventional and asymmetric warfare", and knows their tactics for running a manhunt. If they continue to use those tactics, then they leave themselves open to attack because the suspect will not simply anticipate what they will do, but will plan for them to do it. When the police were briefed on the situation, they undoubtedly adjusted their tactics so as to be prepared for the suspect should he present himself. From the sounds of things, the police involved in the shooting took those new tactics too far.
But, no. Because I didn't jump on the bandwagon and condemn them for it immediately, you have taken the position that I am making excuses for them. I am not. I have never said that what they did was justified; in fact, I have repeatedly said the opposite.
Ironically enough, you all claim that the suspect's background makes no difference in how the police would carry out the manhunt. If you actually
were running the manhunt, then I'd be very concerned for your well-being and/or your reputation since the person your would be chasing knows exactly what you will do and will take steps to evade you. So he'd either evade you long enough to embarrass you publicly, or he'd ambush you.