- 9,401
- Western Sydney
- mustafur
Because name legacy matters when selling a car.My question would be why would the number matter? It's still an RX.
Last edited:
Because name legacy matters when selling a car.My question would be why would the number matter? It's still an RX.
So you're saying that there wouldn't be any significance if a 9 filled in the blank?The L
Because name legacy matters when selling a car.
Probably but the RX8 did water the name down.So you're saying that there wouldn't be any significance if a 9 filled in the blank?
I'm sure the car would be significant enough by just having "RX" on it.
I don't think you're understanding what I'm saying.Probably but the RX8 did water the name down.
Although not the same situation name wise, Do you feel the R35 GT-R would be such a success if it was named something different entirely?
The name is important its a psychological thing.
. The RX-VISION is a straight representation of what we wanted to express.” Compared to existing rotary sports cars, this vehicle comes closer to the super-sports genre. The RX-VISION exists on the same level as sports cars such as the Chevrolet Corvette, Lotus Evora, and Alfa Romeo 8C. In line with existing modern sports cars it appears that the vehicle height has been set quite low.
As the first rotary sports car concept to come out for some time, and one that is set to take up the position of Mazda’s flagship car at that, rather than stick with the traditional compact size, this new machine has been designed with a large body frame.
Incidentally, the red color of the body is not, in fact, soul-red premium metallic, but rather a glossier, deeper color that further signifies the car’s evolution.
Maeda added one last comment, “Being a sports car, we are aiming for further weight reduction, so don’t be surprised if we chip away at the body a little more.”
The RX7 (2 seater, rotary in front, power in back) has always been the RX7, the RX8 was something different.
It should be called the RX7...
I don't see how, the RX-8 was never a replacement for the RX-7. It was it's own thing.It would really be throwing the RX-8 under the bus to call this the RX-7.
If by "watered down" you mean "sold almost three times better than the FD RX-7 everyone raves about (despite being on the market for two years fewer)" then yes, the RX-8 absolutely watered the name down.Probably but the RX8 did water the name down.
I already posted that on the last page. 👍
Whoops.I already posted that on the last page. 👍
There is a reason why it sold more, for a huge part of the RX7s life it was only sold in Japan and the car was considerably more expensive when you put in for inflation.If by "watered down" you mean "sold almost three times better than the FD RX-7 everyone raves about (despite being on the market for two years fewer)" then yes, the RX-8 absolutely watered the name down.
The R35 GT-R is a weird car to reference too, since it was the car that dropped the Skyline name and became its own thing. Up until the R35 debuted I'd have said the name Skyline was almost synonymous with GT-R, yet dropping that name hasn't exactly harmed the R35's success. Again, I'd be more inclined to say it's the car that's resulted in its success, rather than the GT-R badge - it did go from three generations of being a ~300hp car to a 500+hp one in one step, after all, and was more than fairly priced initially.
People get way too hung up on names. As the Miata... I mean MX-5... I mean Eunos Roadster... sorry, Mazda Roadster suggests, you can pretty much call a car whatever the hell you want provided the product itself is good.
If Mazda called this new coupe an RX-9 people wouldn't refuse to buy it because the number was two digits out from something they were potentially familiar with. They'd buy it regardless because it looked amazing and offered performance/handling/whatever else buyers were looking for. And if it didn't sell, it'd probably be because Mazda arsed it up, rather than because it wasn't called RX-7.
You kinda did.And I didn't say the car will not sell if its not called RX7 simply that it will help, nothing more nothing less.
Because name legacy matters when selling a car.
But I didn't, I said it matters that's all.You kinda did.
Amusingly, Mazda USA has given up that ill-advised rebranding attempt they tried when the NC launched and now seem to have committed to... calling it all three:People get way too hung up on names. As the Miata... I mean MX-5... I mean Eunos Roadster... sorry, Mazda Roadster suggests, you can pretty much call a car whatever the hell you want provided the product itself is good.
RX-9 probably makes more sense, especially if the car is going to be headed for unprecedented performance levels.
That being said, I have an enormous amount of affection for the RX-7 name and genuinely feel it is the most special (non-super) car series to ever emerge from Asia. My heart wants it to be an RX-7.
It's so rare that it's probably beside the point, but Mazda did in fact already create and sell a model called the RX-9.
(that's the piston-engined version, but the body is the same)
...aaaaand that doesn't actually change anything about my point. You said the RX-8 watered the name down.There is a reason why it sold more, for a huge part of the RX7s life it was only sold in Japan and the car was considerably more expensive when you put in for inflation.
Naturally when you put these together its going to sell less.
Apart from in Japan, where the entire brand it was sold under changed from the first to the second generation.The MX5 Reference is a strange one considering it has been called what it has since day 1 in the given market its sold.
And I didn't say the car will not sell if its not called RX7 simply that it will help, nothing more nothing less.
Your wording implies the opposite. If it matters - which it doesn't really, unless you've got an incredibly strong heritage behind the name, like a Corvette or a 911, then the RX-8 would have been a flop. As someone said earlier, 'RX' is more a part of Mazda's rotary heritage than the number they suffix it with.Because name legacy matters when selling a car.
It's so rare that it's probably beside the point, but Mazda did in fact already create and sell a model called the RX-9.
(that's the piston-engined version, but the body is the same)
RX-10, anyone?
Actually, they should do a Polyphony and call it the RX SPORT.