I use Photoshop 7 and tried the "contract" (called "pucker" in PS7) lesson. I can't achieve the same effect because I don't have half as many seetinds as you. I think you use CS 2, and now I see why that is so much better. That sucks because I have a few good pictures that could use a puckering. Anyone know a good torrent for CS that doesn't require those stupid registration numbers and passwords and such?
Your shots look great, nice angles and colors, but I noticed one thing you do wrong. When you do extreme depth blurs, like your Jag pic, the reflections, since they are coming off off whatever the surroundings are, should also be blurred to that extreme level. If you don't want to screw up the shiny look on the car, you could blur them a little, and then just go easier on the depth blurs. It makes things look a little more realistic. Otherwise great shots, I like em.
Superb. Your shots are simply superb. Btw I also think that reflections are "moving" over the surfaces of the car, and are changing in the same way as the environment so they need motion blur too. It doesn't matter, the quality of the images are excellent with or without blur.
Salu2.alexwrc
Erm...the focus is on the car, and the camera is supposed to look as if it's following the car along, so the reflections would still be in focus and in their original shape. I have an image taken of a 350z in Evo magazine that demonstrates what i mean perfectly.
No they wouldn't, the car would be in focus, but the reflections are of objects going by at (what seems like) 300mph. I know the car would look focused, but the only way the reflections would be is if they are moving along with the camera too.
Example 1
Example 2
EDIT: Magazines edit their pics you know, you can tell the ones I posted don't have blurs added, and very slight if they do.