GTSport is the only vr on console, so I would like every track known to man. Please keep them coming kaz.
Can’t wait for Monaco (after spa)
Er... Driveclub VR? You can even race with that one!
I too want a new track not used in every other racing game but there is a BIG advantage to tracks in GTS over PC. I have PC1 and their tracks look terrible, Willow Springs for example looks worse than GT6. PC2 has improved but still doesn’t come close to looking as good as GTS.
Maybe you haven't seen PC2 in 4K? I'll take SMS's version over GT's any day, simply for the time transition (night racing WS is as terrifying as it was in GT6!), but overall, play PC2 in 4K, PD's advantage drops quite a bit.
Frankly, I don't get the mindset that PD should have tracks not already in other games. First off (apart from Interlagos), every single real world track at launch was already in GT4,GT5 or GT6 well BEFORE Project Cars 2 or Forza 7 so already, this argument has a hole in it. Then comes the previous real world tracks they added prior to Catalunya:
Monza ( Gran Turismo 5)
Tsukuba (Gran Turismo 4)
Circuit De La Sarthe (Gran Turismo 4)
Red Bull Ring (Gran Turismo 6)
Fuji Speedway (Gran Turismo 4)
So exactly how is PD bringing these tracks back Them "adding Circuits that were already in other games" (or the even more sillier notion that they are "Catching up" with Project Cars 2) when they literally had all those circuits in previous iterations well before said games? I get people want new tracks that aren't popular, but this seems just waaaay out there and this is coming from someone that owns many of the same games (and even older ones) that had the same circuits in them for years.
This is a good point, but visual accuracy is only one aspect. PC2's tracks 'feel' better, less billiard table smooth, and have the edge of weather, ToD, year round change and rubbering in effects. Not to mention, usually more up to date scans than the GT6 versions. But my main point is, the tracks in PC2 that were in GT5/6 are a small subset of the real world tracks it has, there's a huge selection of tracks like Snetterton, vintage Spa, vintage LeMans, Oulton Park, Sugo, the list goes on and on, that GT has never had.
Just in the year since launch, SMS added Brands Hatch RX, Barcelona RX, Leipzig's Porsche Test Track, vintage LeMans, Mugello, and Pista di Fiorano (Ferrari's test track). Not too shabby!
PD's attempt to add tracks based primarily on tracks it lost while ignoring (with Interlagos and Catalunya as exceptions) tracks it never had, leaves GT trailing, with little chance (at this rate) of ever catching up. But prioritizing real tracks not in any other game, and relegating some of the PC2 real tracks to the back burner would at least give GTS more of a 'must play' feel.
PC1 was a PS4 title, launched mid-2015 with a track list already far superior to GTS. 3 years later, and even better. Comparisons to GT6 hardly apply, when they weren't even for the same platform. PD's glacial pace gave them the field alone, and now they are in catchup mode, at still the glacial pace. Basically, at this rate, PD will never catch up. But they can be different...
But they don't appear to want to be.
Personally, I think the car 'feel' has gone backwards from GT6. Non linear throttle response, abysmal slow speed traction and tire model. Driving standards are way worse than they used to be in GT6 public lobbies, and I think we can put this as the primary cause. Not sure your bump stoppers reference... Razor burn? 
. I too prefer PD's fantasy tracks over some (IMO, please don't kill this poor casual GT player) boring real life circuit, even though I don't know much about the one they're adding now and will reserve judgement after I race it.
