I've given her a chance since 2005. Since then, she has been overexposed and presented as the best thing to happen to IRL since the Brickyard was built. In five years she has had one win and podiums that I can count on one hand in a series where there are only about 6 people who ever have a chance of winning anything. She's also known for whining about everyone and everything that even potentially kept her from winning a race; which, combined with the way she is constantly held up on a platter, has led me to be unwilling to watch any Indy races but the 500 and the Glen.
She's entering a much more even, much more "violent" and much more competitive sport. She will probably not finish as consistently mediocre as she does in IRL, likely falling off into "outright bad." She will undoubtedly whine about it more because of that. I'll give her a chance, but I seriously doubt that her career in NASCAR will do anything but add more backlash against her; and if they treat her as a darling and give her more coverage than anyone else like they do in IRL, I will probably stop watching the few Busch races that I do watch.
Notice the part of your quote I highlighted there?
Your pretty much right, except I would whittle it down to 4 drivers--whoever happens to be driving for Target Chip Ganassi and Penske in a given year.
Occasionally, Andretti/Green teams (now just Andretti) have been competitive, but last year, they fell back noticeably in performance.
That's why Danica's performance last year was so impressive.
She outperformed her teammates! What better measuring stick of a driver's performance can you have than that? Isn't that the most
fundamental thing you want to do in team motorsports?
She had the same (lame) equipment as Marco Andretti and Tony Kanaan, and she had better results than they did. That's more than Dale Jr. can say about his results this year
The fact is, unless you drive for Ganassi or Penske, your odds of finishing higher than 5th--much less winning a race in the IRL are sketchy at best. She has done about as good as can be expected with the equipment she's been given. In all fairness, she probably should have had a win or two more, and a few more top five finishes so far in her career, so she has perhaps slightly underperformed.
While I will readily agree she is overhyped, the fact remains that
she is the most successful, professional female motorsports competitor in history.
In what other
major sport do women compete
directly against men? None that I can think of, so someone correct me if I'm wrong.
The fact that she finished 5th last season in a 24 car car field (excluding the Indy 500) is pretty damn impressive if you ask me.
Yes, the competition will step up a notch when she moves to NASCAR, but not because the drivers are better. The reason the competition will be better is that the teams in NASCAR are much more well-funded as a whole (I'd be willing to bet that the
mid pack Nationwide teams budgets are as big or bigger than either Ganassi or Penske's IRL teams) and NASCAR rules are more conducive to competitive racing.
How will she fare in the Nationwide Series next year? I think she'll run about midpack to be honest, and she could easily have a few top ten finishes. She'll have really good equipment with JR Motorsports, so if she doesn't do well, she won't have many people to blame but herself.
But to say that she doesn't deserve a shot at the Nationwide Series, based on her 5th place finish in the IRL last year is absurd.
I mean we're talking about the Nationwide Series--where over 150 drivers scored points last year. Everybody gets a shot at the Nationwide Series. I don't think you even have to have a driver's license to be eligible to drive in that series