But we don't know which physics mode the player is using.. as there're altogether 4 different physics modes - casual, normal, experienced and pro.
with all the in-game ads it doesn't make sense to pay $59 for spam
Posted by Myke "I should not believe anything posted on the internet to attrack hits from fanboys to my site" 6699.............
Andy "rollcage in a rally car isn't realistic" Tudor), .........
Posted by Myke "I should not believe anything posted on the internet to attrack hits from fanboys to my site" 6699.
Do people think about what they read, or just ....whatever. But hey, gamerzine already altered their original story, what a big suprise.
And Myke, do you really think, some of the decals on the cars in NFS are not payed for already by sponsors
I like how they won't post decent videos showing their awesome totally-in-a-different-class-than-GT5 sim driving, they likely won't make a demo, and just want people to take their word for it.And as far as I can tell all the videos have had assists on which means they haven't been driving on the "Pro" setting so we can expect it to be more realistic than these videos show it to be.
Posted by Myke "I should not believe anything posted on the internet to attrack hits from fanboys to my site" 6699.
Do people think about what they read, or just ....whatever. But hey, gamerzine already altered their original story, what a big suprise.
I liked pro-street, physics were quite a bit too heavy bit it was still the most realistic driving model nfs had so far.
I liked pro-street, physics were quite a bit too heavy bit it was still the most realistic driving model nfs had so far.
Edit: erased becuase I found comments that answered my question. I don't wanna frustrate peopleAndy T. today removed the comments he made yesterday about demo and "Ferrari DLC", so take my comments in post 1438 for what they are worth, or not
German site Xboxfront.de posted two more XBOX 360 vids.
[youtubehd]N5MhBBEgS1E&fmt=22[/youtubehd]
Jay, will try again as I was not clear enough and you seem to have missed my point.They altered it but didn't make it anymore sensible, Andy still states "adding rollcages was a good work around but one we haven't had to do on Need For Speed: Shift".
So adding rollcages was a good work around? The car comes with a damned rollcage. Only thing Andy took back was the "Slightly less realistic" part.
Pro Street was terrible... The physics were WWAAAYYYY to easy... You BARELY needed to brake at all and dont even get me started about the drifting and high speed challenges...
They altered it but didn't make it anymore sensible, Andy still states "adding rollcages was a good work around but one we haven't had to do on Need For Speed: Shift".
So adding rollcages was a good work around? The car comes with a damned rollcage. Only thing Andy took back was the "Slightly less realistic" part.
Jay, will try again as I was not clear enough and you seem to have missed my point.
Sites like that one live by the traffic they generate and they achieve that by using “extreme headlines”. In this case site had short interview with SMS, pick a few lines out of their context and split it up in two 15 line stories with two catching headlines. One about Shift + Prostreet 2---> get's linked on all NFS sites (traffic up) and one about GT5 and unrealistic damage --> every GT site and the rest of the internet.
Of course a compagny like SMS has to react to the GT5 story, because they did not say that and there name get dragged in something they do not want to be part off. Site is ofcourse more than welcome to add a minor update to the story, but leave the original story intact and above all, the traffic generating headline, right or wrong, still stays.
IMHO, it is wisely to not take everything to literal/seriously from stories like that. If you want to take anything out it, look at the bigger story, like Jordan did today on the news page. Does this maybe explains the 830+170 cars thingie from that Japanese text, are there 170 (race)cars with roll cages that have a different kind of damage model, compared to the other 830 cars? (etc./etc.)
But if you really want to analyze stories like that word by word, I’m not holding you back
IMO, that's why he assumes, PD will add rollcages in all cars as a workaround for the damage.
IMO, that's why he assumes, PD will add rollcages in all cars as a workaround for the damage.
Which is still a silly thing to say anyway.
Although, it's as silly, as to have half of the grid with "damage", and the other half without (hope not).
I don´t think that this one has already been posted, but it´s worth ! (Especially for the grid-girl) :-)
Doesn´t seem to work!
Here is the link:
What silly comment did he make then??.....
In the end he made a silly comment that backfired unless GamerZine totally made it up..... Which even though they want lots of hits, I doubt.
What silly comment did he make then??
IMO, he probably just answered a simple question about NFS Shift damage, get's aked why their doors don't fall of and explains how PD got smart and found a way around the "driver/cockpit damage limitation"
Result is a silly and as updated untrue headline and a GT defence force stepping up to defend thier game, in end for no reason, because no one sad anything bad about it afterall.
,