well then 1.1% obviously means alot then
yes, your first point seems mostly correct. i never knew that was its intended purpose, i thought it was to show some miraculous slaughtering of the demanded time.
however, its not like a literal perfect lap would prove useless. isnt learning from perfection the best? if youre not learning from perfection then the percentage of knowledge extracted is that much lesser. otherwise why would they show the mind-boggling 6:58 in the demo of S-16?
but i dont want to make too much of a thing out of this. i dont have anything against you, just pretty damn proud of my time
yes, your first point seems mostly correct. i never knew that was its intended purpose, i thought it was to show some miraculous slaughtering of the demanded time.
however, its not like a literal perfect lap would prove useless. isnt learning from perfection the best? if youre not learning from perfection then the percentage of knowledge extracted is that much lesser. otherwise why would they show the mind-boggling 6:58 in the demo of S-16?
but i dont want to make too much of a thing out of this. i dont have anything against you, just pretty damn proud of my time