- 24,636
- Anoka, MN
The election is a ways away, I would be real suprised if he could ride this wave for a year and a half.
Calender wise, yes. Politically it's next week.
Besides, Republicans were still trying to use 9/11 in 2008.
The election is a ways away, I would be real suprised if he could ride this wave for a year and a half.
Just imagine what they'll do when Xbox Live goes down, then. As for Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection, no-one gives a rat's ass.
Amazing what the americans can do when the PSN is down.
Quoted from another forum: "It's amazing what the Americans can do when PSN is down".
It's Amazing what the Americans can do when the PS3 Network is down LOL (found it on fb)
Well, Obama couldnt log on to PSN, so he decided to try "Call of duty" in real life...
It's amazing what Americans can do when PSN is offline!
It's amazing what Americans can do when PSN is down.
Sorry.
Have you guys heared what the Americans did while PSN was down??
Granted they are asking less about proof of his death and more about the hows and whys. The story has been a bit confused as it was first said that he resisted, used his wife as a shield, etc, but now it is being said that he didn't resist and his wife was not used or killed. If that is the case then it means that this was a kill order and he was assassinated, not killed while resisting apprehension. That can raise questions with the UN.UN rights boss asks US for facts on bin Laden killing
03 May 2011 16:28
Source: reuters // Reuters
GENEVA, May 3 (Reuters) - The United Nations' top human rights official called on the United States on Tuesday to give the U.N. details about Osama bin Laden's killing and said that all counter-terrorism operations must respect international law.
Navi Pillay, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, said that the al Qaeda leader, killed in a U.S. operation in Pakistan on Sunday, was a "very dangerous man" who had claimed "command responsibility for the most appalling acts of terrorism", including the Sept. 11 attacks on America nearly a decade ago.
"This was a complex operation and it would be helpful if we knew the precise facts surrounding his killing. The United Nations has consistently emphasised that all counter-terrorism acts must respect international law," she said in a statement issued in response to a Reuters request. (Reporting by Stephanie Nebehay; Editing by Louise Ireland)
Sometime next month, the fathers of the Cuban Revolution will flock to the city of Santa Clara for a special ceremony the likes of which the island has never seen. From Fidel Castro on down, they will gather at the base of a 22-foot bronze statue in a city square. There, with all the reverence and solemnity of a high Mass, they will lay to rest the long-lost bones of the legendary Ernesto "Che" Guevara, one of the founders of Cuba's revolution and an icon to would-be rebels the world over.
At the foot of his gargantuan likeness, 30 years to the day after his death, there will be speeches and tears. They will speak of Che's dreams, his Spartan life and stubborn courage, his revolutionary fervor. Perhaps they will even speak of his capture and execution in the jungles of Bolivia.
The story has been a bit confused as it was first said that he resisted, used his wife as a shield, etc, but now it is being said that he didn't resist and his wife was not used or killed.
Personally, I am fine with an assassination order. Anyway, whatever the UN wants to see will likely be more than enough evidence to confirm his death. If I never see it I will find that to be satisfactory.
Here is an article going over the confusion and corrections:All the stories I've seen say he used a woman as a shield and she was killed, they also say his wife I.D.'d his body.
EDIT: Also(I can't remember the names) I saw 2 of Obama's security group interviewed and one said it was "try to capture, then kill" and the other said simply "kill".
Again, didn't say it did. It's just how you always decide to read & respond to them, even when you end up being wrong. The whole paragraphs you always right are quite frankly, tl;dr b/c it's usually just a rambling of whatever the topic is.It is. It's just the way your posts read. Whatever was said in another thread has nothing to do with this discussion.
I prefer my ice cream made with raw milk. We have some in the America thread, mmmm tasty!If you kids learn to play nice, maybe we can all go out for some ice cream!
i was thinking today to myself "self, where have i seen a burial at sea that wasnt a burial?"
/tinfoilhat
As you just judged mine. It should be obvious I do read it, though. I wouldn't have described them as ramblings if I didn't. Regardless, it's how you to choose to answer & give some sort of history lesson than that just plainly respond to a post.Nice to know you don't read everything I write before you go judging it.
Tesla^That made me chuckle.