Ovals VS Road Courses

  • Thread starter Sam48
  • 726 comments
  • 39,080 views

Which would you like to see more of, ovals or road courses?


  • Total voters
    549
Nascar its bloody obviously if you lost a second in a third of the track, because your suddenyl at the back. In f1 or v8s in australia or btcc or german tc or whatever, the race is also aginst a circuit.


Nascar... things to look after
car
change in track
other guys around you

f1 things to look after
car
change in track
other guys around you
15 different corners that each need to be handled differently depending on the stage.

In NASCAR you still have to race the track, maybe not as much but you still have to. There are only two turns, which means you have to nail them spot on every time or there is no way you will win.

Here's an example, say there is a restart with 2 laps to go, you are in the lead. Now in road racing if you mess up in the first turn there may be a chance to get the lead back at another corner, whereas on an oval if you flub the first corner you are not going to win.

Also, thanks for making a post that isn't ignorant bashing.👍
 
hey... has anyone mentioned Talledega to be featured?

I think Daytona is confirmed. We won't get two restrictor plate tracks on the release. I'd rather have Daytona if I had to choose one. I hope and pray there will be a track pack released a few months after nov. A nascar track pack, which will complete all the tracks. I'm thinking the "track editor" won't be able to create a nascar track.

To the haters that say NASCAR tech sucks. I'd remind you we are getting 800hp at 9000 RPM out of a 358 V8. I think F1 gets the same but at around 19000 RPM I could be wrong. But I know that F1 engines and Nascars engines are much closer then people think as far as power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y32xxXyRrbc
 
Last edited:
If you are going to respond to me, please use some intelligence, and some grammar skills

I speak french, we'll both ahve to make an effort.

I'll reiterate, all this started with me responding about how Nascar is the easiest form of professional racing, due to the fact that they race all, but two races, on ovals.

Oblige me to be intelligent here and prove my point.

Jimmy Johnson and Average Joe meet on a weekend.
They race 1 lap in a FXX Ferrari Enzo on a formula one circuit. Then race a dirt/gravel point to point rally stage in Loeb's car. And finnaly an oval in Jimmy's sprint car.

Now they obviously can't drive a F1 so I gave them an Enzo, and, for the sake of this example, Jimmy's laps and rally time are all 1 minute. Now in wich event will Average Joe be the quickest to the finish line? My personnal answer: an oval. Is slowest time will be in rally, then the circuit, oval being the better.

You will say: "this is not racing conditions", alright then, let's give him a rolling start on the circuit, one car on his right, two other cars in front and behind him, every car a meter away, all formula one drivers except Average, what will happen to him the first hard braking corner may I ask?
Now for the rally stage, let's give him an icy stage, it's snowing, visibility is almost inexistant, you have to rely on your copilot instructions, do you think he will finish the stage (he can't cheat and go at 30)? Now, oval, 200mph, surrounded by cars, three feet between each one, he might hit someone else, but chances are he will last longer in this setup, it's like following a car very close on the highway, noone will brake hard, no sudden move to the right or left, noone will have to yield through the corner as you can race 2 wide at 200mph. If it's Bristol he might hit someone under braking, but those things brake so slowly he might be alright if he miss the braking point by a meter or two.

Same thing can be said about every race series, no fans means no money. That is why the A1GP failed, it couldn't attract fans.

But the point is, how many people race on ovals on a track day? When you race for the sake of racing yourself and others? Would you rather race a field of 40 cars in Nice's streets or the Autobahn?

Here's what an oval is; small amount of corners, all constant radius, almost no Gs, high banking, 3 lane wide, you have to be a total noob to oversteer or understeer under these conditions, there is so much room for error, the apex is so easy to hit, how can a race driver not be bored?, why would someone that good and competitive race something less challenging?, those guys race on the limit yet they don't want to master an environment where reaction time must be spot on? You drive on the highway at 200mph, there is no traffic, sure it's fast and you'll sweat your arse off, it's scary, but do this for a week and it won't be as exciting, for a month and it won't be anymore. It's all about entertainment. If it wasn't to entertain millions of people they wouldn't race in circle on tarmac. The strongest competitors want the strongest competition, from their opponents, and track.

1)If you are trying to make NASCAR sound bad, don't reduce your grammar to a horrible level.
2)Every thing that isn't point to point is going in a circle.
3)They go 200mph, how is that slow?
4)Any driver that gets paid is a professional driver, making NASCAR drivers professional.

I like Nascar, the most fun I have with my best friend in Forza 3 is racing our 300Ms, Nascar engine swap. But on a circuit, not an oval. It's easy on an oval.
2 and 4 are semantics.
I never said 200mph is slow, I said reaction time on an oval is slow, relatively speaking; when you compare to road courses.

Once again, not everything has to be state of the art to be interesting.

Not everything has to be state of the art, but when you are the state of the art serie in stock car racing, you should be running state of the art technology, those cars could go a second or two faster around Daytona. A little modern technology upgrade to be up-to-date with the 1960s, nothing radical that would ruin Nascar, they would still bounce all over the place, but with 20st century technology at least. I'm not talking about a rear diffuser, just some things that were brought to racing half a century ago.

I'm guessing you are around 12 and have had computers and all that crap your whole life and have never had to deal with things that were just plain simple, they also were a lot more fun.

A personnal attack isn't an argument. 12 is the time that passed since I have the right to vote.

Ask a black person about those simpler times.

Once again, what is a proper "race version"?

A car that has the handling characteristics of a race car. Look at a V8 supercar, the backend doesn't jerk under hard braking (yaw), it's composed in corner entry, a Nascar is all over the place they have to fight with it constantly. I'm not just saying that, Jacques Villeneuve, Patrick Carpentier and Alex Tagliani all said similar things regarding the nationwide cars they drove at Montreal in 2008, and they were amongst the leaders, they weren't just complaining. And Jacques, wich is known for is criticism when a car isn't top notch, specifically said it felt a lot heavier than it actually is. I don't have a quote and if I find the RDS (TSN) footage it'll be in french.

Once again, how is 200mph slow?

Read, read, read my friend.

Also, if it's so easy than why can't JPM win on ovals? Sure he was crap in F1 when he switched, but surely if NASCAR drivers are so bad even the worst F1 drivers could beat them.

The Sprint Cup drivers are good drivers, they are better than all of us, but not as good as drivers in other renown series are, the front of the field might be able to compete in DTM or JGTC, but they'd be at the back maybe getting lapped, who knows, Montoya would probably be amongst the leaders if he didn't lose his touch racing in circles. Now if you take DTM and JGTC drivers and put them all in a Sprint cup car they would probably all be spread out evenly in the pack on ovals and leading on road course, how can you tell Lewis Hamilton from Jimmy Johnson if the course is easier than their skills, wich is what an oval is.

Have a great day friend, don't be afraid to face the truth, it can only make you a better man.
 
Last edited:
Juan Montoya (F1, CART, Indy 500, Grand-am winner), Jacques Villeneuve (F1 winner & world champion), Scott Speed (F1 driver), Marcos Ambrose (Aussie V8 Winner), Mattius Ekstrom (DTM winner & Champion, RoC winner), Dario Franchitti (IRL winner)..

Betweeen the lot of them....

NASCAR Oval Wins........ ZERO

Sorry, but comparing talent across disciplines isn't as easy as making sweeping generalisations...

.. and yes NASCARS are heavy brutes, not state of the art, have less grip, and are nowhere near as compliant to drive as other forms of motorsport,.. kinda makes it MORE of a challenge?
 
Sorry for bumping up again the thread regarding that Montlhéry oval, but this looks almost as if it was a gameplay video from GT (because of the very different cars actually racing on the short road course section of that track), I found it great:



Truly awesome vid. Seriously, reminds me of GT.

I just have to say this; A Sprint Cup car is very much a racecar. The SC´c have about as much in common with their roadgoing counterparts as a DTM or SuperGT car, wich is basically nothing. The SC is actually pretty high tech - hence the soaring costs in NASCAR.

And leaf springs... If I remember correctly the Mustang GT has rear leaf springs...

I've noticed the newer NASCAR machines coming up to spec with road going cars.
 
so because he doesn't agree with having loads of ovals he's a troll?...

for me ovals are just...well...ovals. I suppose they're versatile as in they can be turned into road courses but i'd prefer proper road courses myself. It shouldn't matter too much any way, you can probably make ovals with the course editor.

no, its how he goes about stating it with his immaturity that makes him a troll
 
30 isn't all that old. Age doesn't mean much anyways, look at the NHRA, there are plenty of old guys that can still go out and win every weekend.

this is true, John Force, the best funny car racer in NHRA history, as well as the best NHRA driver ever, has 14 championships (going for a 15th this year) and over 120 wins, and is 50 or so years old

also, there is Chris Karamesines, who, however doesnt have a win yet, he's been racing for 60 years or so, and is 81 years old, the first to be that old and race top fuel dragsters

so yeah, i just wanted to put that out there
 
Juan Montoya (F1, CART, Indy 500, Grand-am winner), Jacques Villeneuve (F1 winner & world champion), Scott Speed (F1 driver), Marcos Ambrose (Aussie V8 Winner), Mattius Ekstrom (DTM winner & Champion, RoC winner), Dario Franchitti (IRL winner)..

Betweeen the lot of them....

NASCAR Oval Wins........ ZERO

Like I said, all the Sprint Cup drivers and those you mentionned are more skilled than what an oval can offer in term of technical challenge when driving a stock car, therefore it comes down to experience and the ones you mentionned aren't seasoned stock car drivers, on a road course it's a different story.

Sorry, but comparing talent across disciplines isn't as easy as making sweeping generalisations...

Beside rally, drift and drag racing, those disciplines are all the same, the driving techniques that apply in F1 apply to Nascar on both oval and road course, it's the same fundamentals.

.. and yes NASCARS are heavy brutes, not state of the art, have less grip, and are nowhere near as compliant to drive as other forms of motorsport,.. kinda makes it MORE of a challenge?

Actually the more grip the car has the more difficult it is to master on a circuit, the faster a car can take a corner the narrower the race line becomes and chances of error increase. Same can be said about chances of error increasing as engine power goes up, brake power, etc.
 
Last edited:
Like I said, all the Sprint Cup drivers and those you mentionned are more skilled than what an oval can offer, even with stock cars, therefore it comes down to experience and the ones you mentionned aren't seasoned stock car drivers, on a road course it's a different story.

That's basically proving the point of what everyone arguing ovals take skill to race has been trying to say. Just as it is unfair to say oval racing must be difficult if F1 drivers aren't successful racing them, it is also unfair to say circuit racing is more difficult because oval racers aren't successful racing circuits. Each style of racing has its own merits and different skills needed to achieve success. At the same time, each style has their own downfalls and disadvantages.

I like watching all forms of racing; ovals, circuits, rally, etc. Racing as evolved differently everywhere, but each series has unique challenges. To just assume because a series takes fewer corners and has less technology it must be inferior and easy compared to 20-corner circuits and the pinnacle of today's technology is just asinine.

At the same time, I respect the viewpoints of those that don;'t like ovals because it's great to have different views. to have everything the same would just be boring. And I'll be the first to admit, though I like NASCAR, they can tend to be dull for a good portion - if not all - of a race.

That said, I like racing on ovals, but I don't want more that 4 or 5 real ovals. As long as there's a short track, I'm happy. I'm more excited to take a NASCAR on a circuit, and I'd rather have way more circuits in the game.
 
lalaurentide all your post are opinion and hypothetical situations. Though I respect your opinion. But......

Since the guy behind you is trying to be faster then you... there is NO room for error. But you disagree? You said in Nascar there is plenty of room for error. Yea I guess so if your goal isn't to win. If you screw up the entry to turn 1 you will pay for it all the way to turn 3. Since ovals actually give you enough room to pass, you WILL get passed. Unlike road course where the racing line dictates where you can pass.

Since the only cross overs we have today are those mentioned, they have no wins...yet. It basically comes down to experience driving a certain style. Give Jeff Gordan 20 years of road racing. He'd be a beast. Give Juan Pablo Montoya some more time. He will win.

But as much as you'd like to you prove that one takes anymore skill then the other you can't.(though I'm sure you will quote me and try your heart out) Its racing man, its being faster then the other guy. You just can't compare the two. Apples and oranges man. So just stop trying. They both take skill. And there is no gauge or rule book. No all knowing race GOD that can prove other wise.

I love Nascar. And all forms of racing. Hell I will watch lawn mower racing if its on. But I don't go around ripping other forms of racing. But on the other side of the coin road race guys are so hung up on telling us that our sport sucks and it takes no skill that it makes us sick. Its all hear say and opinion..... All they do is turn left. 4 turns... and on and on. Don't care dude.

It can be boring yes. Do I hate the Cookie Cutter tracks they added a few years back. Yes. I'd love to see a few more road races and short tracks.

I've been to Bristol. It was amazing. So here are 160,000 of my friends that don't care what you or anybody thinks of there sport. Wave to them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWTVpeJ7krc

Back to the topic.... 3 short tracks 3 cookie cutters 1 super speedway. Though I wish they'd put all.. I know they won't.
 
Last edited:
i think one oval is always enough. too many ovals and your just playing the same track with different atmospheres around it. can you tell im not a fan of nascar btw?
 
i think one oval is always enough. too many ovals and your just playing the same track with different atmospheres around it. can you tell im not a fan of nascar btw?
You mustn't be a fan of NASCAR but even when you don't know NASCAR at all you you'd be capable of knowing more about ovals.

@lalaurentide
Stop going around in circles. If something's easy you can learn it within a short time. JPM has had a long time to learn but hasn't mastered oval racing yet. That tells you oval racing is indeed hard.
 
You mustn't be a fan of NASCAR but even when you don't know NASCAR at all you you'd be capable of knowing more about ovals.

@lalaurentide
Stop going around in circles. If something's easy you can learn it within a short time. JPM has had a long time to learn but hasn't mastered oval racing yet. That tells you oval racing is indeed hard.

stop saying 'stop going around in circles.' it's supposed to be 'stop going around in ovals'

seriously man...come on! lol :P

i think most will agree that road courses have a much higher degree of difficulty than oval ones...
 
Ahhhhh. The old Daytona comparison. I know that its the most popular so those who have raced on it think that,s Nascar....Daytona. Charlotte motor speedway will be in the game for sure. Thats where they are at in the one trailer for the game..taking pictures and filming and such. That's where most of you with only Daytona experience will go whoa ok this is different. Although I'm just assuming I could be wrong. Anyway ADD ME. We'll take this to the track in NOV. I might get my butt handed to me on all tracks. But my MW2 friends aren't gonna get this game as COD7 comes out around the same time.
 
Doesn't Texas also have a wide configuration of road courses built into the oval?

They have a 'roval,' or a road course built into the oval. Out of turn two, there is an entrance into some twisting areas, and then an entrance into turn four. In other words, it's kinda like the Daytona roval.
 
Again such rovals are commonly far from satisfactory. Over 1.5 Mi ovals are an exception but even these are usually dull, bland and flat.
 
Back