Patch 1.10 - new single player mode "GT League"

  • Thread starter ststav01
  • 1,978 comments
  • 241,625 views
In my line of work, if somebody gave me such a general completion date of only the month it would be completed in without any specific date and that statement being made late in the previous month, it would tell me two things, one that there still working on it and the other is that there's a 50/50 chance of it being ready in that month.

If we do receive it this month, expect to add more bugs to the bug list.:dopey:
 
It's the regular R32 with livery editor at work.

I can already see this and I'm calling it now... we'll get a barrage of 'new' cars in the same fashion that used to exist in the previous games...aka same car, different livery, change a few performance parameters and before you know it you have 700 cars and 50 GTRs to choose from.
 
I can already see this and I'm calling it now... we'll get a barrage of 'new' cars in the same fashion that used to exist in the previous games...aka same car, different livery, change a few performance parameters and before you know it you have 700 cars and 50 GTRs to choose from.

And Miata's
 
You utterly missed the point that Kaz said it would not be missing any features from past GT titles. "Nothing has been dropped, things have only been added."

Now if you wish to talk about semantics, I'm quite sure you know that content and features are pretty much interchangeable in this regard. Did I say content when I meant features? Yes. Does that invalidate the point? Not at all.

Nor was my point about bugs semantic, quite the opposite as I clearly described it as a subjective element. The attempt to make it an objective, measurable value was yours. So please do let me know how many bugs are required for it to be buggy? What scale bugs are measured on, as not all bugs are born equal? How do we then quantify these bugs into a single value to check against the buggy minimums value?

Don't throw around accusations of logical fallacies while appealing to an unknown authority, presenting a strawman and quote mining.

How could I be quote mining when I quoted you in entirely within context. Nice hindsight bias bro " you know that content and features are pretty much interchangeable" in WHAT WORLD! You are literally " shifting goalposts" to make yourself look better and admitting you used an equivocation fallacy. Those two words, even in that context, are not the same things.Something can have a wealth of content but lack features and vice versa. Kaz was wrong when he said nothing was dropped, two things were indeed dropped, Course creator and car maintenance, the reset was either adapted or modified for sport. You can still race and upgrade your cars as you win more races, although it's useless when only 10% of the career races let you select a car. Geez , you found an absolute that wasn't an absolute from a translation. Also, you can accuse me of "strawmaning" when you replied to MY comment and not vice versa. My original comment was : GT sport is neither unfinished or buggy. I'v stayed on topic the whole time, haven't I.
 
I don't think it does.....it says we plan on starting DLC in December not that it all comes in December....

The tweets which might be semi official suggest variations of existing....

What is clear despite the comments about no official communication from PD and Sony is the communication is being ramped up e.g.
TG article being 'coincedentally' published now...so we may hear more news sources over the day and tomorrow....
New locations? New layouts?

I guess not.

What are the new layouts?

I only see one possibility, which is the West Circuit of Suzuka. Only.

Maybe the old track of Interlagos? Although the GT4 brought Fuji 80s and GT6 Monza 60s, I think it would be hard work for PD to bring the old Interlagos. Lol.

Maybe a Blue Moon Bay mixed circuit? I do not think so. I've had the curiosity to observe the internal sector, and I do not see anything there, just models of parking lots.

They are likely to bring the West Suzuka only.
 
I wonder if we’ll get the hypebeast cars with this update too? They’re already all in the game, they just need a custom livery on them.

That shouldn’t take too long, right?
 
IMG_20171221_121551.jpg


I can definitely say the update will land on Friday, since they skipped the maintenance on Wednesday.
 
the difference between 2160cb and 1080p upscaled to 2160p is huge... what are you talking about?

You're saying there's a huge difference in the screen I posted? Have you taken 1080p and 2160cb screens in HZD and compared them?

1080p compared to native 2160p is huge. HZD's 1080p compared to 2160cb is not.
 
Finally. I'm sick of seeing all these guys (edited...) driving that car in GR.4.

You start a race, look at the qualifying board, and the top 5 are all Meganes.
 
Last edited:
RIP RENAULT MEGANE

The Genesis will be the next Megane ;) Unless there’s a new era of AWD dominance coming our way...

Gr.4 was a terrible idea from the beginning... There are no FF GT4 cars nowadays... Even the Megane Trophy cars were MR.
 
Last edited:
The Genesis will be the next Megane ;) Unless there’s a new era of AWD dominance coming our way...

Gr.4 was a terrible idea from the beginning... There are no FF GT4 cars nowadays... Even the Megane Trophy cars were MR.
If the Megane gets nerfed I think the Scirocco will take up the torch unless it gets nerfed too.
 
They’ll mess up the BoP again. It’s too hard to balance drastically different cars
Which is the downside of Group 4's diverse roster. I do appreciate the diverse selection of different drivetrains and vehicle types in Group 4 but it's clear that properly BoPing then isn't as easy as with Group 3 where everything is rear drive.
 
Back