///M-Spec
Staff Emeritus
- 4,928
Originally posted by jpmontoya
All countries or people that are against the war in Iraq have been called knee-jerks everywhere by supporters of this war...
:shurg: Not language that I would use...
M
Originally posted by jpmontoya
All countries or people that are against the war in Iraq have been called knee-jerks everywhere by supporters of this war...
Originally posted by live4speed
Well the people that resotrt to name calling are the jerks, and they can be found on both sides of the debate, it's an argument in their eyes.
Originally posted by ///M-Spec
Of all the anti-war people in the thread, he is the only reasonable one.
Now, are you going to ANSWER MY QUESTION or pull a Spain and tuck tail?
M
Originally posted by K_Speed
I was talking about Juan Pablo Montoya...the F1 Racer
Originally posted by GoKents
All of the Fundamentalist groups and all of the rouge nations want to see Bush out of office.
Originally posted by milefile
If Kerry wins in November and America hastily pulls out of Iraq then I would have to say that cowardly, weak Americans won the election.
Originally posted by milefile
Spain caved in for Al Qaida. It is cowardly and embarassing.
Originally posted by TurboSmoke
mile, why is there a gaping discrepancy in your views of America and Spain?
This is what i meant when i talked about people being biased...when Spain pulls out they are cowards, when America pulls out (which seems likely is this Kerry article gets in) its only the Kerry voters who are cowards...whats the deal?
If Kerry is voted president then I would have to say that "America" has been reduced to a mere geographical name (what socialists seem to want for all countries), having lost what made it the last and greatest aspiration of humanity.
Originally posted by skylineGTR_guy
He also said this
There is no discrepancy. You're splitting hairs over semantics. Obviously, in any country where the leaders are elected, there will be percentage of voters who voted for the losing candidate. So where's the discrepancy? Would it have made a big diference if I had said "the Spanish voters who elected Zapatero"? It goes without saying. The actions of the Spanish prime minister represent the country. You have no problem understanding that when it's Bush who's at issue. I have no problem understanding that in every country there are those who voted for somebody else and who are not represented by their leader. But they have to wait until the next election. That's democracy.mile, why is there a gaping discrepancy in your views of America and Spain?
Originally posted by milefile
So again, where is the bias?
Originally posted by neon_duke
He was stretching.
What does this add to the discussion? It's no different than saying something stupid like "it is inherent in the Muslim psyche to be violent and hateful".you cannot be unbiased despite your attempts to the contrary...its inherant in the American psyche and is implied in your words...
I don't ever hear you acknowledging your bias. Or are we to assume that you are the Voice Of Pure Reason?Originally posted by TurboSmoke
you cannot be unbiased despite your attempts to the contrary...its inherant in the American psyche and is implied in your words...
i am not saying that there is anything wrong with having a bias as such, you cannot help it....just dont deny it, thats all...
Well obviously there is bias from both sides, but since Al Jazeera is based in Saudi Arabia (as far as I know) and is independant from both the Iraqi and American governments (I'm sure the army has some say in what the different networks show) I believe its the most accurate reporting service availible. It's ok if you want to be illogical and tell me otherwise.Originally posted by ///M-Spec
Come again? It is the most reliable of all news services because it offers a Mideast/Islamic perspective? Am I missing a bit of sarcasm or irony here or do you actually believe that?
M
Originally posted by Crayola
but since Al Jazeera is based in Saudi Arabia and is independant from both the Iraqi and American governments I believe its the most accurate reporting service availible.
Originally posted by Crayola
It's ok if you want to be illogical and tell me otherwise.
If you think that any Muslim news agency based in any Muslim country is less biased than CNN, I think you are the kind of person who only thinks other people are biased.Originally posted by Crayola
Well obviously there is bias from both sides, but since Al Jazeera is based in Saudi Arabia (as far as I know) and is independant from both the Iraqi and American governments (I'm sure the army has some say in what the different networks show) I believe its the most accurate reporting service availible. It's ok if you want to be illogical and tell me otherwise.
im sorry but if you have any support towards al jazeera, your a FUKING moron!Originally posted by Crayola
Why do you have something against Al Jazeera? It is probablly the most reliable of all news services, because it shows the war from the perspective of the Iraqi/Islamic people.
Originally posted by 5LiterRiceEater
this is coming from someone that was over there for a year and a half!