Its main feature, the Gold subription literally just enables you to do what is on most platforms free to do. What does Gold do so much better than what they do on PC for free?
And a few its direct competitor can't do or charges for as well.
The big impact was the downtime and the faith in the company. I am confident that Sony must have put a lot of effort to make it much more secure now and others must have learned lessons from it too so better security all aound.
The big impact was a cost of between $105 and $250 million on top of that as well.
While MS has certainly had issues with hacked accounts its not been even close to the scale or impact that Sony have had, and while I'm 100% sure security has improved the damage is already done.
I still doubt they will charge but if they did charge I guess they will put a lot more value than what Microsoft is currently doing so it won't be as bad a deal.
A rather huge assumption on your part I believe, but its good to see the predicted back-track starting.
MS charges for on-line and its a rip off and should be free.
Sony do it and it will be of far more value.
There will be still likely be quite a bit of a hit on total number of users gaming online. Sure most would start paying for it as long as it is not some extreme cost in the end.
My point exactly.
Given the amount of cloud storage you can get for free and features on the web, I don't see why you won't get a small amount of storage for free in future. PC games do it free to an extent.
No one gives away cloud storage, you may not pay for it directly, but web sites get revenue from it one way or another.
The key point here however is that Sony do charge for it.
You are still paying for stuff that vast majority of its features are free on other platforms.
As I am for a few features on the PS3.
I don't get exclusive demo access, discounts off games and DLC and cloud storage for free on PSN either.
Sony have already started this process.
Why does Microsoft not charge to use its Live platform on Windows then? They have admitted competition on this doesn't really allow them too. Sony don't have to exceed what Microsoft are, just offer the same level of features and you will see most likely a lot more people going to Sony.
It is worth it for you currently I understand, and that is why they have been able to get away with it for so long but given the margin between PS3 and 360 currrently, imagine when majority of advantages are free now on their rival platform. Microsoft were lucky in that Sony never took them serious enough so never saved space in Game OS for the extra features that 360 XBL Gold users can get but with most likely PS4, they will have a very capable, highly integrated online platform from the get go. It will be less compelling for current 360 users to have to pay for a similar service again if in feature set offers no standing out feature. Worse still if Sony exceeds everything XBL Gold does and does it all for free.
If and when Sony match PSN you might have a point, but you are missing one very large factor in all this.
Sony needs income and one very easy way of getting it is to charge for on-line access, anyone doesn't think that's a factor quite frankly is not looking at this in the same way Sony have to (as a business).
I do however love the Sony not taking MS serious, are yo honestly that naive?
It is not as simple as that. 360 would have been released similar time as PS3 and would also cost more if it did have Blu-ray. RROD should have also helped in sales department like YLOD so it is not one way only.
At the moment, going by rumours even with next Xbox most likely having Blu-ray drive, I think it will be going back to Xbox 1 levels of success and highly successful period for Sony. I wouldn't put it past Microsoft given what I have seen of Windows 8 regarding design.
It will be interesting to see today what will most likely shape the rest of this decade in regards to gaming.
While it will be interesting to see what today will bring you would have to be mad to discount MS as a player in the next generation and certainly Sony's track record for the last few console releases don't bode well at all.
Personally (having bought every PS at launch) I want them to turn things around, but they are not just going to get my money blindly. Quite frankly both Sony and MS have brought sold products to the market place this generation, it will be interesting to see if they can do the same again.