I just hope that if he wins, he keeps those promises.
It's because they know that they someone who can go head-to-head with Hilary Clinton. If a candidate came out of the debate looking strong and the public believed that it was only down to the moderators letting one past the keeper, their credibility would tank as soon as they squared off with Clinton in an arena outside the network's ability to control. And there's so many candidates that they had to run two debates, the main event and the undercard. The best way to get a firm footing against Clinton would be to have one candidate stand out from the rest on big policy issues.I'm surprised that Fox is asking so many gotcha questions to the candidates and not a bunch of soft balls.
This late? I dunno about that ever happening.*Unless Biden steals it from under her nose, of course.
This late? I dunno about that ever happening.
I'm not new to politics, pal. I know he won't keep his promises but that doesn't mean you can hope .You must be new to politics.
I'm not new to politics, pal. I know he won't keep his promises but that doesn't mean you can hope .
Sorry, my sarcasm detector is in the maintenance shop today.You're reading too much into some light sarcasm.
Q: If you could have a previous President, any previous President Of The United States, in the White House today who would it be and why?
Q: If you could have a previous President, any previous President Of The United States, in the White House today who would it be and why?
You're reading too much into some light sarcasm.
Q: If you could have a previous President, any previous President Of The United States, in the White House today who would it be and why?
SO the best ones are the ones that caused the most debt to the US?To answer your question, either Reagan or FDR because of their leadership (military and diplomatic) abilities and how they were able to recover the country during their times of office.
Yeah, trump was getting more direct questions than any of them. Sort of unfair with what he's been touting but that's him apparently. The entire women question was a joke though.On first inspection, it would appear Trump won the "debate", handling the toughest questions in stride.
Bush and Walker didn't seem to help themselves, but Kasich did, so the field tightens up behind Trump for the moment, with Fiorina advancing from the 7 dwarves. At least that is the media view as I see it. How the voters will react remains to be seen in new polls.
He is. A lot of bad press lately. He had to play it safe. His back and forth with Christie was the only issue he could afford to get loud on, and I wonder if he didn't ruin any bump it gave him by eye-rolling when Christie mentioned 9/11 victims. I think that is up to viewer opinion. Either you agree that the constant 9/11 story is wearing thin 14 years later, or you feel it was disrespectful.Back to reality.
Rand Paul came across as a wounded animal.
The debt increase under both Bush 43 and Obama combined are far higher than the combined debt increase in 2015 dollars from Reagan and FDR. (Around 10 trillion).SO the best ones are the ones that caused the most debt to the US?