Which would be more admirable if you were doing it with any knowledge about how Bernie gained much of the support he did or who it came from. There is a member who frequently posted in this topic who is part of the 10% or however many of Bernie supporters who never even considered following him into Clinton's camp. While I don't want to speak for him, his complete disinterest in voting for Clinton after Sanders endorsed her seems to allude towards what has been said in this thread today. Assuming that is true, should we take from that that he is a Trump supporter too, as you were implying to be the case for everyone else in this discussion?
Take what into account? The only reason I brought up your country was because you were, and still are, dictating to politically active North Americans why they shouldn't question the integrity of a grassroots political candidate after endorsing a rival many of his supporters hated everything about. You went so far as to nearly say that everyone doing so in the discussion was a Trump supporter. When most of the people from the rest of the world on this forum comment on American political situations, they seem to have a better grasp on what happened than just assuming that whoever they were arguing with vote the other party; hence the joke about your regional expertise.
Again, with how quick you were to tar people for being Trump supporters with no basis other than your assumption that only Trump supporters would think Sanders shouldn't have endorsed Clinton, for all you know you're telling people who would have voted for Bernie Sanders what they should feel about Bernie Sanders endorsing Clinton.
Why alluding that i said such things, things that i don't even think...
On side note, i follow this campaign with a lot more assiduity than you seam to think, starting before primary to today, watching/reading meetings of all sides (including Trump, surprisingly and genuinely entertaining - no sarcasm here), debates, analysis and comments.
I saw Sanders campaign tone change as primary was going on, progressively switching from a no-friendly fire stance to regular attacks toward Clinton. Worse, he sensibly moved his political cursor toward populism, raising the probability to disappoint his supporters. This is when, i think, he didn't do the things right, as he jeopardized his credibility when time would come to go back in the lane, Democrats and democratic lane.
And you're perfectly free to have interest, but I'm under no obligation to care about the your interpretation of the European viewpoint when you try and swing around "the rest of the world is amused by your political candidate" as if it was an argument; or indeed as if Trump was my personal political candidate.
Nobody said you have the obligation to care about something. As a matter of fact, i never quoted nor wrote your name before you quote me, i only made general remarks following comments, among which yours.
That being said, if you don't care about the outside world, it'll care about you.
And while we're here, Ladies and Gentlemen, please fasten your seat belts:
Trumps alluded a few weeks ago that Obama has a poor image seen from abroad...
