That's exactly the opposite of what her tax plan will do.
It all depends on how you define what exactly is middle class. I have personally heard it defined as anyone who makes below $200,000/yr. I may have posted this once before, but it bears repeating. If incomes across the board are on an astronomical rise (as seen in this chart below), and the middle class is shrinking, where are they going? Obviously, they are getting richer. And if the middle class is anywhere less than $200,000/yr., then they will hit the higher tax income brackets rather quick because they are not "paying their fair share."
Source: The Wonderful World of Stu - The Blaze
I retract my previous statement about Bernie Sanders being a viable write-in option, he is not because he did not file the proper registration paperwork with each state to be eligible. You may vote for him but your vote will not count and it will be thrown out. So basically, it's either Jill or Gary now
Actually, I did some research, and he is a viable write-in candidate in 7 states, because, under state law, you can write in anybody that you wish. They are Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Vermont, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Iowa, and Oregon.
45 states have "Sore Loser" provisions, which bar a primary candidate that lost that state's primary from running in a general election as an independent. At least two of those 45 have laws that apply to Presidential candidates. However, it is unclear whether or not it would apply to write-in candidates.
Nine states do not allow write-in candidates at all, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, Hawaii, and Nevada. The remaining 34 states require you to register to get on a write-in candidate list.
