- 1,971
- Seattle, WA
Citation needed. I'd rather have someone who left other countries to themselves than someone who believes in intervening in everyone else's affairs.
He's probably referring to the Aleppo comment.
Citation needed. I'd rather have someone who left other countries to themselves than someone who believes in intervening in everyone else's affairs.
Do most people have a candidate that represents all of their positions? I don't think so. Most people vote along party lines because they are willing to take the good with the bad with whom they support so that their party prevails, I am increasingly unwilling to do that.
If I write in a candidate it will be mostly to not leave the space blank to help prevent election fraud, it won't be because I think whom ever I write in has a chance of winning.
He's probably referring to the Aleppo comment.
I'd gladly take two replacement candidates over the trash we have right now, even Biden/Ryan would be a step up from this and I'm not a fan of either dirty Uncle Joe or P-90x Austerity boy. As a nation we have gone from electing our best and brightest to nominating Elitist idiots who simply just have more money than anyone else, even though there are far more qualified folks for the job. When you allow corporations and banks to buy candidates then what you get is corporate shills running for president, which also means you no longer have representation.
Citation needed. I'd rather have someone who left other countries to themselves than someone who believes in intervening in everyone else's affairs.
Where is the evidence of that?She covered up Bill's rapes,
Which President hasn't been?she has been responsible for the deaths of thousands of american citizens
Where is the evidence of that?
Which President hasn't been?
It was at this point that I stopped reading.
First of all, saying that those deaths happened before or after being President is a mere technicality. Secondly, you say that she is responsible for the deaths of thousands of citizens, which is definitely something that you need to substantiate with evidence.Hillary hasn't been president yet, and most presidents are having soldiers die, men and women who put their life on the line as a sacrifice for our freedom, innocent citizens is a much different story.
Which just shows that she spoke out against his accusers. You accused her of covering them up, which is to say deliberately concealing, obscuring or destroying evidence; it's perverting the course of justice, which is very different to verbally attacking the accusers. The article contains no evidence of that.There's that^
http://www.dailywire.com/news/9585/...on-threatened-smeared-or-amanda-prestigiacomo
There's that^ And also, Hillary hasn't been president yet, and most presidents are having soldiers die, men and women who put their life on the line as a sacrifice for our freedom, innocent citizens is a much different story.
Edit: I respect your opinion though prisoner 👍
Protect your freedom how? Have the soldiers been deployed in USA to defend the borders of your country?
Shouldnt the Saudi be the country that would be attacked and not Irak and the rest in the middle east?
All I see is just a fast way of making money which is war and have nothing to do with protecting sombodys freedom. After all 9/11 did happen and your freedom got more restricted by your own Government. If it is someone you want to blame for all the deaths then blame Bush and co.
Actually, under the law, that's exactly what it means. Everyone is presumed innocent until their guilt is proven, and a lack of evidence is not in itself evidence.No evidence doesn't mean she isn't guilty
Sounds like the F.I.B.Actually, under the law, that's exactly what it means. Everyone is presumed innocent until their guilt is proven, and a lack of evidence is not in itself evidence.
If the name is Bernie Sanders, it might for once have a chance.*...because a write-in has a chance of winning? Why would the chance of a candidate winning affect whether or not that candidate represented your positions?
Unfortunately when it comes to the Clinton's they can just get people to cite the fifth and then pardon them avoiding it all.Actually, under the law, that's exactly what it means. Everyone is presumed innocent until their guilt is proven, and a lack of evidence is not in itself evidence.
Why? Cause some back water hole in the middle of a desert full of mortar scorch marks, defines his ignorance? Or better yet defines the mass media as a shrill institute no longer founded in part on objective news telling but rather deciding for you through news what you want? I mean when you perpetuate something it's obvious what the answer is.Really wish Ron Paul was running. The best person at this point is Gary Johnson even though he seems to be ignorant on geopolitical issues and gives off a hippy vibe.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/gary-johnson-aleppo-227873
What's a leppo?
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/gary-johnson-north-korea-229221
https://www.johnsonweld.com/issues
I don't care if people use marijuana but I just don't see why it's such a big deal to legalize it.
I'm more of a right wing libertarian, while Johnson is a left wing libertarian. I'm not saying he's not good enough, I'm just saying his lack of knowledge on world events right now is kind of dangerous as to how the U.S. will be able to help solve these issues if he gets elected. The US has already made an impact with its intervention, it's impossible to just not help. Again, I'm not saying dur bomb every country that's a threat. Some countries like Assad's Syria need to stay in power, the Middle East needs secular dictatorships to deal with Islamism. Look at Iraq today.
Just so that we're on the same page, are we discussing Hillary and her involvement in Bill's sex scandal? While you are right in that no evidence is not evidence itself, you have to remember that there was plenty of talk about Hillary intimating witnesses in Bill's impeachment trial, and that's still a crime.Actually, under the law, that's exactly what it means. Everyone is presumed innocent until their guilt is proven, and a lack of evidence is not in itself evidence.
She covered up Bill's rapes
It also isn't very "liberal" of her to want to raise taxes on the middle class and not explain why she'd like to do so.
Something he said 11 years ago is, coming from her, pretty hilarious that she would even think that going there was necessary.
One thing, he is definitely getting ganged up on during debates from Hillary and the moderators
His tax plan is truly brilliant and... would help low/middle class people live much better.
I am very well informed
Hillary or Clinton, not killary.killary
Well I was able to hear Trump's speech today, if what he said about the interview, were she claimed he groped her, is true this story won't stick. The whole family was there and in the open. And if it's true about first class airlines not having adjustable arm rests back in the day, the other lady's story is BS also.
The Clinton camp is trying to hope any stupid story they can come up with sticks. If all this is really set up shame on all of them for misleading the most important vote in this country.
It all boils down to what the majority of the people, represented by their states, think is most important - stuff from the past or the stuff that is going on now and in the future.It's possible that the stories are nonsense... but what about the chick in the elevator from the 80s? In at least that case this is an unverifiable claim. Coupled with the video and his statements in general toward women, there's no way this doesn't stick. I agree it's totally manufactured (not at all coincidence that it comes out in Oct), but this is going to stick to him like crazy.
It's possible that the stories are nonsense... but what about the chick in the elevator from the 80s? In at least that case this is an unverifiable claim. Coupled with the video and his statements in general toward women, there's no way this doesn't stick. I agree it's totally manufactured (not at all coincidence that it comes out in Oct), but this is going to stick to him like crazy.
It all boils down to what the majority of the people, represented by their states, think is most important - stuff from the past or the stuff that is going on now and in the future.