- 6,425
- KCCO
So... there was a Democratic debate on PBS, and CNN picked it up as well.
Poor Hillary, when will she ever get her facts straight..
Poor Hillary, when will she ever get her facts straight..
She is too busy trying keeping her lies straight.Poor Hillary, when will she ever get her facts straight..
You care to substantiate this bit at all?
So there is a New Micheal bay film coming about called 13 hours which is about what happened in Bengzahi
EconomistThe order to “stand down” was never made, according to multiple investigations: seven of them congressional and one independent. Those investigations, most of them led by Republicans, multiplied as allegations over the administration’s handling of Benghazi grew.
Boots that were actually on the ground say different:By "coming" I think you mean "was out last month". By "Micheal" I think you mean "Michael". By "what happened in Benghazi" you have to remember that it takes artistic licence with the truth, as do many action films. It's not a documentary.
With Michael Bay’s “13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi” set to premiere Thursday, the five surviving members of the six-man Benghazi security team have blitzed the airwaves to promote the film and renew their assertion that a top CIA officer delayed them from immediately answering State Department distress calls. Three even testified to the same before the House Select Committee on Benghazi last spring, several sources have confirmed to POLITICO.
Source“There is no sensationalism in that: We were told to ‘stand down,’” said former Special Forces Officer Kris Paronto, one of the CIA contractors who fought that night, in an interview with Politico. “Those words were used verbatim — 100 percent. … If the truth of it affects someone’s political career? Well, I’m sorry. It happens.”
SourceRep.Trey Gowdy, chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, said Wednesday that a number of witnesses had confirmed a stand-down order was given to military assets in proximity to Benghazi the night of the 2012 terror attack, while others said no one issued such an order.
Source
Chairman on the House Select Committee on Benghazi confirms that witnesses have testified to that effect:
Washington Examinerhe doesn’t necessarily believe the “stand down” he heard was nefarious
Everyone involved has a dog in the hunt. Assuming for a moment it is a cover up, your career is on the line if you step out of line and if you take a look around you and realize you'll be going it alone or nearly so, not a lot of people have that kind of courage. Again, assuming the allegations are true, it would be quite similar to how Watergate unfolded. Facts come to light, denial, denial, denial by official sources, investigation, the whole thing falls apart on the testimony of a handful of people involved directly in the crime and in the cover up.Which, in all, says that rather than send a single team immediately the commanders were also trying to raise local Libyan units in assistance. That context is undisputed on a bipartisan basis, or so I thought. The words' usage is disputed by the commander and, for Paronto;
As also noted in your link, no deployment of any speed would have saved the Ambassador.
Finally, Paronto has a significant dog in the fight - he's the one who wrote 13 Hours with Zuckoff, the book about the attack which took place while he was a private Blackwater contractor.
As a personal opinion I feel more inclined to trust members of the US military in their version of events.
American foreign policy does not change, it's the reason people like Ron Paul cannot be elected and it's most likely going to be the reason Hillary will be chosen over Bernie.
Well, I see little difference between say Bush Jr and Obama, maybe one enjoys the toy planes more that the other lol. I see what you are saying however.
Especially when Suspicious behaviour like this occurs: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/15/hillary-clinton-benghazi-testimony_n_2308153.htmlIf you want to know how powerful a motivator personal interest is to keep quiet you need look no further than the Tobacco industry and cancer.
Finally, Paronto has a significant dog in the fight - he's the one who wrote 13 Hours with Zuckoff, the book about the attack which took place while he was a private Blackwater contractor.
As a personal opinion I feel more inclined to trust members of the US military in their version of events.
If Democrats had been in charge in the 60's would America have gone into Vietnam? If a Democrat was in the White House do you think the U.S. would have went into war in Korea? Ooops...This is a really unhelpful point of view IMO - typical of the libertarian perspective: anything short of perfection is basically worthless. It does seem that foreign interventions have been a constant in American foreign policy ever since the Second World War, but that doesn't mean that there haven't been important differences in degree & approach under different administrations. If the hanging chads had gone the other way, I don't think it's likely that a Gore administration would have launched a full-scale war in Iraq. Would a Republican administration have come to an nuclear agreement with Iran?
Ron Paul wasn't elected because only a small minority of the American population supported his positions. If he had been elected I think the chances are he would have ended up with some continued entanglement in foreign interventions, just like Obama has, in spite of his anti-war stance prior to election ... & the same way Sanders would if he were elected. This doesn't mean that electing Sanders over Hillary, or Hillary over Jeb, Rubio or Cruz wouldn't result in significantly different foreign policy outcomes.
YesRepublicans held the White House for 12 years from 1980-1992, the years in which the Soviet Empire collapsed. Would that have happened under Democrat rule?
We don't have a federal whistleblower protection law, otherwise a lot of those books that are/were discredited by the government on the basis of the whistleblower having some financial gain would gain a lot more credibility if they went through legal channels first.Does making a Movie and Books(Both things that help spread the message of His events) Discredit him simply because he can and has made money off them, what about all of the Remaining witness's supporting those accounts as well?
If Democrats had been in charge in the 60's would America have gone into Vietnam? If a Democrat was in the White House do you think the U.S. would have went into war in Korea? Ooops...
Republicans held the White House for 12 years from 1980-1992, the years in which the Soviet Empire collapsed. Would that have happened under Democrat rule?
This is a really unhelpful point of view IMO - typical of the libertarian perspective:
You care to substantiate this bit at all?
That could be hard to do for more than 2 years as Republicans have recently come out in force during the mid-terms.Outstanding news. Looks like we're going to keep the white house, just need to take back congress, or at least the senate. Will have to exorcise that room he died in though.
I have considerable doubt that Obama can make an appointment and have it confirmed by the senate before his term expires.US Supreme Court Justice Scalia dies.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-35571868
This could be huge for the democrats as the courts could have 5 left leaning justices.
The man leaves behind a wife and 9 kids.
Well David Souter resigned in June of 2009 and Sonia Sotomayor took office in August of that year. However, that was with a Democrat majority.I have considerable doubt that Obama can make an appointment and have it confirmed by the senate before his term expires.
That's a very good point.I have considerable doubt that Obama can make an appointment and have it confirmed by the senate before his term expires.
Have some bloody dignity man. A supreme court justice just died. Let the nation mourn a bit before you spout that garbage.Outstanding news. Looks like we're going to keep the white house, just need to take back congress, or at least the senate. Will have to exorcise that room he died in though.
Please... Fox News has already gone through a list of people they think are "suitable replacements" for a republican controlled Senate/House, and presidency...Have some bloody dignity man. A supreme court justice just died. Let the nation mourn a bit before you spout that garbage.