what looks to me is a G25, but the wheel turning and the GT5turning of the wheels didnt really match.
But i'm sure PD will find a way to compensate that
I agree that the camera needs to be looser, but when did a fixed camera become an arcade game thing. Also, there may be an option to choose the cameras loosness, or it may be changed by the release of the game.After watching all the new videos i noticed the following to my disapointment:
The Chase View -> still looks like an arcade game
The angle of view still seems fixed to the cars movements thats what makes it look like the car is fixed to the screen and movements only apply to the track.
Really AWFUL, and this in a game which utilizes a resolution of 1080p..
I remember my first driving games on a commodore 64 : Chaseview looked identically
No more fun to you perhaps, but this is something myself and many others have been wanting for a long time. A more realistic driving model. You know what the other driving model is for don't you, people like you who perhaps don't want the professional physics. I love the driving in the games like GTR, RFactor, LFS etc but I didn't enjoy it in GT4. You might find these other games more difficult, or less fun, I find them more natural to work with. If you don't like thoes physics, fine, use the watered down ones, that's your choice. You seem dissapointed, or put off by the fact that the choice is there, that is something I'm struggling to ge tmy head around.New Physics (Pro Mode) -> Maybe more realistic, but no more fun
In most of the vids you can see the drivers going off the track because the car is heavily understeering - mostly they end up last after one single lap.
Ok they will have to get used to the new physics, but:
In computergames you have to estimate your cornering speed visually, because every computergame lacks of the presence of G-forces which in real life gives you an indication for the speed.
And if that visual impression doesnt match the actually max cornering speed given by the physics of the game the driver tends to going too fast around the corner.
I find this in many PC Racing-Games (i.e. GTR, GTR2 etc.) and found that for me it doesnt make fun to play them anymore so i quit.
Mx²;2752001
featuring damage I dunno...I'm pretty sure kotaku got it mixed up. GT5 will feature damage at some point, but not in GT5. I'm pretty sure he would have mentioned that in the first long video interview.
- I woouldn't place my money on it. If yes - then we're into big surprise for sure.
in GT series in near future. TGS is in 30 days from now, and game release is 60 days from now. Demo showed in Leipzig is around 3 months old, so there are probably some aspects we didn't see in this build - driver animation, movable camera when driving inside the coockpit and online chat integration - if I can predict well. But damage - I really guess not. 
Mx²;2752001
Indeed. I've already seen on IGN's board, a Forza fanboy claim it sounded like a vaccuum cleaner. I asked if he'd ever been in a Ferrari at 60Mph. He said, "I've seen a Ferrari, yeah!" No...have you been IN one at 60Mph. "No." Then shut cho mouth!
That won't mean anything until folks see it.Mx²;2751990
I think you mean the F430, but so far thats the only car we've seen, but again this is only prologue. By GT5, they'll probably bring back the 599 GTB from GTHD and add more as they did say when they first announced ferrari,"Introducing Ferrari GT Cars" so who knows?yea i wouldn't mind either. is the f40 the only ferrari confirmed in GT5
if not to have already some weather effects (or at least day/night)?
For instance, why would a world map with info on the weather on different parts of the world be on GT5
