Noo you shouldn't have done that...quality is not really an issue with HDMI cables, either they work or they don't. I got a 6' for around $8 on New Egg and have had no concerns for almost 8 months now.
Check the posts above that one... I'm fairly certain he understood that before buying the Logitec HDMI cable:
hey guys,just a quick question.what is the best hdmi cable for ps3 to use on an 26'' samsung tv? oh and by the way,im writing this from my ps3 chris
The cheapest.
There have been plenty of double blind testing of HDMI cables over the years and only one thing has ever been proven to be true... in most cases, spending more than $1 per foot on HDMI cable is a waist of good money.
I'd recommend you check out
MonoPrice, as they have some really good prices on
HDMI cables as well as a lot of other video signal related products, like cables, switchers, splitters, adapters, etc.
For a recent A/V shootout, I bought four of their 6ft
HDMI 1.3a Category 2 Certified 28AWG cable w/Ferrite Cores (Gold Plated Connectors)... at less than $4 a piece. 👍
During the shootout, although no one expected any different, we tested that cable against a $100 3m HDMI cable from Monster... absolutely no difference whatsoever.
Quite right, as far as HDMI cables go, for short runs, the cable with either work or not, no quality difference will be seen from buying a 'better/more expensive' cable.
Th eonly reason you would ever want to spend more on a HDMI cable would be....
- Cables runs over 5m (here cheaper cables bandwidth limits can cause signal loss)
- Better connectors - The HDMI connector is an appalling piece of design and I have come across some cheaper cables that fit poorly and fall out, ironically however the worst fitting connector on a HDMI cable I have come across was Monster.
- You want a cable that looks better - gold connectors and colourful jackets appeal to some people in terms of appearance - they will not however give you a better picture.
...so with runs under 5m (and the vast majority are) buy the cheapest cable you can with a descent connector and you will be fine. The exact same thing applies to Optical cables as well, in fact any digital cable. The only time that cables will vary the quality and/or characteristics of the sound is with analogue signals.
Regards
Scaff[
ok thanks alot for all your answers. i'm going today to the mall and check out the cables and i'll buy the cheapest!
I'll keep postest on how it works and looks.
thanks
Chris
hey everybody, a while ago i asked regarding hdmi cable for ps3 to use on an 26'' samsung tv, and today i bought the logitec ps3 hdmi cable and i have to say the differents is just amazing.thanks for everybodies help.
Chris
I suspect the reason he bought those was that he either could not or didn't want to order online, or perhaps he needed them right away and didn't want to wait for shipping delays. He may also have gotten a great deal on the one from Logitec, you'll never know unless you ask.
Get a bigger TV and the difference will be much bigger.
I use a 34 inch 1080i HD-Ready CRT as my dad does not want any TVs above 35 inches(he says a 34 inch is too much for him
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7708b/7708bb82fb76dc6f268def20d44cf4efdb76e9e3" alt="Tongue :P :P"
).
You know the cheapest and best way to turn a 26" TV into a 34" TV.... sit a few inches closer. 👍
Seriously. All the size of a TV does is allow you to sit farther away and still fill the same amount of your field of vision.
For instance, if you were sitting say 5 feet from a 34" TV, that means you are watching images at a viewing distance to screen width ratio (
DW) of *2.0
2.0 is the minimum recommended DW for watching decent quality 480p material
1.5 is the minimum recommended DW for watching decent quality 1080p material
1.2 is my personal preference, and what I get in my theater with a 98" screen from the middle row
Now to achieve the exact same DW with a 26" TV, thus fill the exact same amount of your field of vision, all you have to do is sit about one foot closer
(15" to be exact)
The point of a large TV is so that you can achieve the same or perhaps even lower DW without having to sit so close to the screen.
For instance, with a 60" TV, you can sit nearly 9 feet away and still achieve a 2.0 DW... where as with a typical 21" monitor, you would have to sit three feet away... which is also why your typical computer screen will "look" bigger than a 60" screen at home... that's because unless your computer screen is over three feet away from you, or you sit very close to your 60" TV, naturally the computer screen is going to fill up more of your field of vision... thus give you larger images.
This same principle holds true with any thing you are looking at. The reason IMAX screens appear so large is that there is no seat in an IMAX theater with a DW any larger than 1.2, and the closest seats to the screen have a DW of about .5... in other words they are sitting half the width of the screen away... which is bloody ridiculous as it means you can't see everything on the screen without constantly moving your head and eyes around. You can achieve this same thing by sitting near the front of your local movie theater... or sit in the back, and it will be like watching TV at home.
No, size is the one thing that will never improve the image quality. In fact, many times larger screens can look worse, because they require far more luminance to properly produce the images as they have significantly greater screen areas to light up.
The best way to improve picture quality of course is to try and buy superior displays and watch high quality video on them. IMAX films don't look better than regular movies because they are shown on a huge screen. They look better because IMAX films are not only captured using some of the best film cameras in the industry, by some of the best cinematographers in the industry, using some of the best lenses in the industry, and shot on high quality 70mm film stock that is capable of displaying four times as much detail as a typical 35mm film you see in theaters, and many times more resolution and detail found in most film transfers on DVD, and even Blu-ray... and then there is the projection equipment.
In your typical multiplex theater, they use very low quality projectors and with lamps that are well past their half lives... and often projected on low quality screens that are far too large for the lamp used in the projector to properly light the screen. Fortunately, IMAX theaters have very strict standards they must follow, and thus why they are the best possible place to watch a film in, at least in public. 👍
So, no. Simply getting a larger TV not only is no guarantee of getting a better picture, but worse yet is when someone chooses an under performing bigger TV over a better performing smaller TV. While you can always sit closer to that better performing TV, you can never get a better picture from a larger TV than what it is capable of displaying.