- 10,456
- United States
- WrecklessAbandon
I have the 60,100,etc times already, just deducting the time it took to hit 60 from the time it took to reach 100 gives you 60-100, etc.CSL, Lots of interesting data. Not sure how you measure all that.
I've been thinking a bit how power, ballast affects the cars. Here is my take.
Ballast mostly affects acceleration. Not sure it affects top speed that much, but it will take longer time to get there. Different from real life, I don't think ballast affects handling or tire wear at all. If so, at least very little. In some cases, ballast can perhaps even improve handling using to improve the ballance of the car.
Power affects acceleration and top speed (no brainer).
This is how above can be used to make cars fit into the GT300 boundaries.
If a car lacks top speed adding ballast and power will improve top speed but not low speed acceleration. Good example is the BMW M3 which in my view lack top speed. Also I think than many of the old JGTC GT500 will fit in by adding power and ballast.
In the opposite way, the FTO has a slippery shape and will fit in better when using a fairly low power/weight spec.
Just my 2 cents, but I think as people are trying new cars, using above approach to make them fit in works pretty well
Right, if it lacks top speed but has quick acceleration, more weight and power is the way to go. (Lexus?)Ballast only affects acceleration. Once the car is moving, and the acceleration decreas with the speed rising, ballast is no longer "in play" so to speak.
To get the weight moving is where the ballast does it job. It will not effect top speed.
Also agreed on the FTO, it's clearly got the top speed, but doesn't have the acceleration, I plan to test 1040-1060KG's at 325HP for the FTO tonight, as surely 315HP will be too wimpy.
Since it's being faced against the slowest GT300 car, it should preferably be a bit faster, to be towards the middle of the pack.
Idea:idea:
Having driven the Lexus 8 races in WSGTC 3, I have some hours in behind the wheel, and as I said once or twice before, I chose the Lexus because it was an all 'rounder and would carry ballast better than any other car in the field. (front heavy 53/47 stock)
So, the Lexus is the best or close to it cornering car, and the quickest, with the lowest top speed, does anyone object to a slightly more powerful, 1200KG Lexus?
I know the specs sound off, for example, a 1200KG, 366HP Lexus, but numbers often don't reflect....