New findings.
It's defenetly more understeer. BUT, you can sort it thru tuning.
I ran the NSX around LaSarthe in 2:52.5 pre 2,09.
And now, after 2,09, I could only hit 53's with the exact same settings due to the understeer.
After some tweaks to my setup, I managed to get the car to rotate better, and really close to how it felt pre 2,09.
Managed a 3:52.0 just now.
I decided to wait with the HSV since it appears it had some tweaks to it self in addition to the new physics.
So in order to separate car specific updates with the general physics update I decided to start with the NSX.
And my findings are that pace is the same, but the setup need to be more rotation friendly now.
On to the HSV now.
Ok, so now, I'm down to my previous PB of 3:52.5 with the HSV.
I had to loose the rear quite a bit.
What can't be tuned away is the fact that it understeers much when turning and braking.
To me, that's a step in the right direction from PD.
Trail braking has been way too easy to get away with in the past imo.
The rear is a tad more planted. Does'nt snap oversteer like before. Much more feel in it.
Perhaps it's too planted, but the progression in feel is welcome.
All in all, a good physics update imo.
So on to the HSV.
The engine revs are increased. However, you can't use the extra 800 RPM (9500-10300k) to any good but as a buffert for draft.
I still have to change gears @ 9400-9600 RPM to get the max out of the engine.
Better sound
Better interior
Much more tire noice
A tad turned down in how stable it was pre 2,09.
It's still stable, but the setup have to be worked with much harder now.
Pre 2,09, for those who did'nt know, the HSV was like a dream with pretty much any settings.
Now, the settings need to be right to "get there".
I think 2,09 is'nt as bad as some might say.
I think it's pretty good actually.