Questions and innuendos about Moderators

  • Thread starter kikie
  • 3,805 comments
  • 241,958 views
So, what happens if one double posts because their cell phone's browser - upon crashing - sends the data twice, and then the member reports itself?
 
So, what happens if one double posts because their cell phone's browser - upon crashing - sends the data twice, and then the member reports itself?

Instant permaban.

I've accidentally double posted a couple times, I just put "Sorry, Double Post" in the report and nothing happened apart from the duplicate being deleted. However if it becomes a frequent thing I'd imagine they would have a different view towards it.
 
So, what happens if one double posts because their cell phone's browser - upon crashing - sends the data twice, and then the member reports itself?
Irregardless of why the second post was made, there can be only one. Either one of them would be deleted or, as I have done once because of being so used to double posts, merged together. :dunce:

:lol:
 
TB
Irregardless of why the second post was made, there can be only one. Either one of them would be deleted or, as I have done once because of being so used to double posts, merged together. :dunce:

:lol:

I was wondering why one of my posts said the same thing twice, almost as if I had typed it twice. :odd: I don't type things twice.
 
Don't make the mistake I made several times in the not so far away past and you'll be fine, all of you.

I tend to reply my own post, when I want to edit it, instead of clicking on EDIT. I report my own double post to the mods, telling them that I once again made the same stupid mistake and, per abuis, double posted.

They remove my double posted post because they love me soooo much!
wub_zpsee9c4f9b.gif


:mischievous:

:lol:
 
Regardless of its use, your source is a website that has definitions for every known meme in the world?

On that fact alone I would never cite anything from there.

Danny you're better than this. :P

...Now let's fight.
 
While I know that amicable synergies are not part of our core competency here at GTPlanet, I suggest we take a proactive approach to this grammatical issue so we can come to an agreeance about it?
 
While I know that amicable synergies are not part of our core competency here at GTPlanet, I suggest we take a proactive approach to this grammatical issue so we can come to an agreeance about it?

Amicable? Synergy? Next thing you know you'll be saying 'chivalrous' and 'chattle'. I won't stand for this, we need to fight as well.
 
If by Communist, you mean we actually recycle once in a blue moon and don't leave the car engine running when we go to bed... yes.

Amicable? Synergy? Next thing you know you'll be saying 'chivalrous' and 'chattle'. I won't stand for this, we need to fight as well.

That is perfectly fine. This country doesn't deal with terrorists!
 
Some say GTPlanet is filled with Communist Mods. Is that Bullish?
Funnily enough, in the last week or so, I've been called a "typical Scottish communist" by an ex-member.

I have no idea what a typical Scottish communist behaves like, but I do my best.
 
Funnily enough, in the last week or so, I've been called a "typical Scottish communist" by an ex-member.

I have no idea what a typical Scottish communist behaves like, but I do my best.

If they were a member that's been around for a long time, I really want to know who it was. If they were just a new member that wasn't around for more than a week, I don't care.
 
Last edited:
TB
Closest I've made it was grammar Nazi. Which I'm rather fond of, irregardless of what others think. :D

:lol: I can already tell someone with a name similar to mine won't like that.
 
Back