- 2,188
- Northwest Passage
It's an expression
The aggression rating is set at a minimum of 40 and a maximum of 60 for every driver in this series. For comparison, most cars in my series have a minimum aggression of 80@rallymorten WHAT THE 🤬 WAS THAT ABOUT! That had better turn things around across the board for one of us!
@nascarfan1400 is there any way to program the AI so they won't hang back? It's not a strategy I like in the first place, but it simply has not worked in this series.
I don't think aggression had much to do with it. I think it's another case of, as rally has said, "More artificial than intelligence".The aggression rating is set at a minimum of 40 and a maximum of 60 for every driver in this series. For comparison, most cars in my series have a minimum aggression of 80
I never see hanging back in NR2003, but I never run a car with under 80 aggressionI don't think aggression had much to do with it. I think it's another case of, as rally has said, "More artificial than intelligence".
OK so aggression has everything to do with it then. I don't know, I don't have NR2003 to find out.I never see hanging back in NR2003, but I never run a car with under 80 aggression
OK so aggression has everything to do with it then. I don't know, I don't have NR2003 to find out.
I just wanna see a race where aggression is set to max to see the wreckfest that would be.Let's put this way; drivers with a lower level of aggression drive more smoothly, but they also don't contest positions that much. More agressive drivers will fight amongst themselves more. But set the aggression level too high, and they'll just Maldonado the hell out of anything that comes within their sights. I know this, as a rFactor player, because in that game you can adjust the agression levels of the A.I. as well. It helps when you're running open-wheel cars for example, because otherwise the drivers would just rip the wheels off every time they'd go for a overtake...
I never see hanging back in NR2003, but I never run a car with under 80 aggression
That could be arranged for Piggz Stadium in my series, if no one has qualms with it . 100/100 aggression rating for every car, damage set off, AI Aggressiveness set to 110%, cautions on so that the field regroups for it's 3 lap shootoutI just wanna see a race where aggression is set to max to see the wreckfest that would be.
That could be arranged for Piggz Stadium in my series, if no one has qualms with it . 100/100 aggression rating for every car, damage set off, AI Aggressiveness set to 110%, cautions on so that the field regroups for it's 3 lap shootout
That's what damage off is for, the only way a car can get eliminated is if it somehow leaves the track and has to get towed backDon't have enough tow trucks
That could be arranged for Piggz Stadium in my series, if no one has qualms with it . 100/100 aggression rating for every car, damage set off, AI Aggressiveness set to 110%, cautions on so that the field regroups for it's 3 lap shootout
It would make the race take twice as long as any other race, but it would be so fun to watch those 90 seconds of actionThat would so crazy, but I'd still watch a race like that. It truly gives meaning to the expression "watching a train crash"...
It would make the race take twice as long as any other race, but it would be so fun to watch those 90 seconds of action
I'm thinking since they start in only 1 line, that it would take at least a lap for action to happenYou mean the 90 seconds of crashing, surely. There is no way a race like that would go more than 4 laps without a caution period. And I'm being kind here...
I'm thinking since they start in only 1 line, that it would take at least a lap for action to happen
Verdict on schemes (Chevy/Ford): I'd prefer you use the new headlights/taillights, but it's acceptable if you do not want to, as the old schemes still fit with 99.9% accuracy.
Toyota: You will need to add the new taillights and headlights.
Dodge: You are still up in the air
Pontiac: You will probably need to redo your cars of you already made them.
All cars are required to be 2048x2048, which means you will likely need to resize the lights.
Likely after round 22 or 23Sorry for double posting now, but I have a question to ask, for @nascarfan1400; when are you updating the point standings? I want to make sure I include that information for my race reports, if possible, so I would like to know when the standings be up to date.
When the new new templates are linked or posted, I'll update then because my luck I'll find the worst kind of wrong ones ever. Until then I'm holding onto both the old ones and the old new ones.They lowered them a good bit.
Likely after round 22 or 23