Aww shucks guys. The in here and that silly opinions thread were worth a smile.
That Ruger is pretty neat. I like how it's only 8 and a half pounds for a .308 semi auto HK's MR762 and LMT .308 MWS are something like a whole ten pounds because they used heavy profile barrels. My main gripe with op rod piston systems in AR's is how they add weight to the front of the gun and tend to cost more, but knowing how Ruger products usually sell far under their MSRP and how this thing's weight managed to be competitive with some 5.56 guns I'm very impressed. The chromed bolt carrier group is a good addition. Parkerizing is fine but the chrome adds a bit of butter to the action. Unfortunately the ease of cleaning benefit of chrome doesn't really happen on forward operating rod gas piston rifles. Coming with a soft case and a few PMAGs is just icing on the cake.
I doubt that most casual shooters, what appears to be the target market for this gun, will get much use out of the adjustable gas block unless they're running some very funky ammo or a suppressor. The front sight uses an "HK" style crescent. A lot of people like the idea of this because it means that the shooter can just make the front crescent coincide with the aperture sight. Unfortunately on this rifle and other AR type rifles, elevation sighting is controlled by the front sight post. So if you align the crescent with the aperture, your elevation is off. If you align the post with the aperture, the crescent being off center despite proper sight alignment can get mildly infuriating. I'd replace the front sight.
I'd really like to see how this "two stage" piston system works. I couldn't find a link or video though.
I'm not disappointed they left out ambidextrous controls. This is supposed to be a simple bargain gun. I'm also not wrong-handed so that might skew my perspective.
Honestly if I were looking for a semi auto with price in mind .308 I think this would be at the top of my list. I would also like to support a company that made a good 2A stance during the recent Assault Weapon Ban scare. I think an LMT MWS (for over a grand more
) would suit the precision focused crowd better, but I love blasting tin cans off-hand so a nice light .308 would cause absolute carnage. The SCAR 17S is a close competitor to this, but those have a reputation for being harsh on optics and operating parts. If I had any criticisms after first impressions it would be that I would prefer a Stoner "direct impingement" system. That would make it lighter and even cheaper!