Russian Invasion of Ukraine

  • Thread starter Rage Racer
  • 10,116 comments
  • 602,231 views
IMG_20220313_154706.jpg

Banality of war

Без названия (7).jpeg

Trolleybus from 1970, best place for Z🤣
 
Russian forces shoot at journalists, kill filmmaker Brent Renaud.


Honestly surprised more haven't been killed yet. Putin is sending in troops who do not remotely care who they kill as long as they aren't Russian it seems.
 
Honestly surprised more haven't been killed yet. Putin is sending in troops who do not remotely care who they kill as long as they aren't Russian it seems.
What the difference between russian speaking Ukrainians and russian speaking Russians? Other than passport
 
What the difference between russian speaking Ukrainians and russian speaking Russians? Other than passport
In this case? An American. Merely it's anyone who they know isn't a Russian soldier now.
 
@inCloud Seeing the report of the Pope this morning, made me wonder, what is the attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church to what is going on?

With all protestors and media being removed in Russia, is there any circumstance where the Church could/would become a tangible opposition?

What happens, for example, if (almost inevitably when) the Cathedral in Kiev is hit/flattened by artillery strikes. That is surely going to raise some difficult conversations in Church services?

Not that everything else going on shouldn't already be causing them already, but Churches are historically a bit picky about symbols like Cathedrals?
 
@inCloud Seeing the report of the Pope this morning, made me wonder, what is the attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church to what is going on?

With all protestors and media being removed in Russia, is there any circumstance where the Church could/would become a tangible opposition?

What happens, for example, if (almost inevitably when) the Cathedral in Kiev is hit/flattened by artillery strikes. That is surely going to raise some difficult conversations in Church services?

Not that everything else going on shouldn't already be causing them already, but Churches are historically a bit picky about symbols like Cathedrals?
I'm sure they're in favor of the war.

 
What the difference between russian speaking Ukrainians and russian speaking Russians? Other than passport
Personal identity. Personal feeling.

I am Welsh and English is my first language (Welsh is actually my fifth language). I grew up half a kilometre from the English border. But I'm Welsh and have singularly only ever felt Welsh. Other people I know feel differently.

My Ukrainian friends in Slovakia are all first-language Russian speakers and they also make the point that desite speaking Russian, they have always been Ukrainian.

Not every French speaker is French.
Not every German speaker is German.
 
Russian Orthodox Church to what is going on
Officially pro war, some members dont support this. There is one fine for antiwar speech from priest.
Cathedral in Kiev
Its Ukrainian Orthodox Church
What is the feeling and mood like in Russia? amongst people you know.
Bad. Some brainwashed, other in depression or trying to dont care.
Personal identity. Personal feeling.
I mean if russian soliders see them or even ask something. I am like 10% Ukrainian myself, but look like someone from Balkans or Jew.
they have always been Ukrainian
Sure, I am not saying that Ukrainians are same as Russians. But its hard to tell who Infront of you, East Ukrainians and Russians looks and speak identically. There is more difference between Russian from Rostov and Saint Petersburg then between Russian from Rostov and Ukrainian from Kharkiv.
 
I really don't think what Russia is doing in Ukraine right now qualifies as "genocide", nor do I think what Ukrainians might have done in Donbass qualifies as genocide. There is no systematic attempt to wipe out an entire ethnic/racial/religious/political group.

What the Nazi Germany did under Hitler was terrible, but what communist Russia did under Stalin wasn't much better.

... the Soviet elimination of a social class, the kulaks (who were higher-income farmers), and the subsequent killer famine among all Ukrainian peasants – as well as the notorious 1937 order No. 00447 that called for the mass execution and exile of “socially harmful elements” as “enemies of the people” – were, in fact, genocide. Stalin had nearly a million of his own citizens executed, beginning in the 1930s. Millions more fell victim to forced labor, deportation, famine, massacres, and detention and interrogation by Stalin’s henchmen.


So ex-KGB officer Putin accusing Ukrainians of being "nazis" is disingenuous at best. Unlike Germany, Russia has never really been forced to acknowledge its own brutal totalitarian history. One of the ironies of this, is that fact that the power vacuum created by the emasculation of German militarism is precisely what has allowed Russian military imperialism to flourish.
Don't forget that Stalin was seemingly on the verge of launching his very own, paranoid, antisemitic holocaust right before he died. Stalin was a really really bad guy.

Question for Russia - of all the places that the US & NATO could choose to develop chemical/bioweapons, why would they choose Ukraine? Has anyone tried to explain that logic?
 
Last edited:
Question for Russia - of all the places that the US & NATO could choose to develop chemical/bioweapons, why would they choose Ukraine? Has anyone tried to explain that logic?
To provoke the bear that is absolutely, never aggressive and always tells the truth.
 
Question for Russia - of all the places that the US & NATO could choose to develop chemical/bioweapons, why would they choose Ukraine? Has anyone tried to explain that logic?
Why would anyone try to explain logic behind QAnon-tier bull**** conspiracy theories? Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.(c)

Before Instagram shutdown in RF
IMG_20220313_212500_092.jpg

Без названия (8).jpeg
 
Last edited:
In a disturbing new development, Russia has requested China to provide military equipment, etc. to support its faltering campaign in Ukraine. Usually it's Russia that supplies China with equipment. In response, the US has said a lifeline to Russia would not be allowed from anywhere in the world. So additional ugly steps in the globalization of this conflict.

Edit:
There are rumblings of an early diplomatic solution between the warring parties. However, this is likely to be preceded by a crescendo of violence.

von Clausewitz: War is politics by other means.
 
Last edited:
In a more chivalrous war, the Knights and archers would garrison in castle and tower, but never in a peasant's hut.
 
In a more chivalrous war, the Knights and archers would garrison in castle and tower, but never in a peasant's hut.
Chivalry is yet another casualty of war (and modern living it seems).
 
In a more chivalrous war, the Knights and archers would garrison in castle and tower, but never in a peasant's hut.
Sorry to break it to you but medieval chivalry was pretty much a myth, and where it did apply it was only for the 'landed' and not for the un-landed peasantry, who were exploited constantly.


 
My point was that the Azov brigade should garrison in isolated buildings which identify themselves with Azov battle flag.
 
Last edited:
My point was that the Azov brigade should garrison in isolated buildings which identify themselves with Azov battle flag.
The point should be that if your going to target civilian areas you better be sure they are valid military targets, and using a shotgun approach with mainly unguided munitions into civilian areas 'cos your not sure' isn't a valid excuse.

Nor is the Azov brigade the only Ukrainian forces in the city, that aside your logic is utterly bizarre, are armed forces (regardless of who they are) supposed to just sit in a singular location and wait to be attacked? That's not even a logical extension of medieval siege warfare, where in many, many cases the castle sat within the walls of a fortified city, and the defending forces didn't just remain in the keep.

 
Last edited:
In WWII, one of our more rational Presidents, Truman, decided to nuke two mainly civilian cities in order to spare American casualties in a direct assault. The US still has a policy of first use in case of need.
 
Last edited:
In WWII, one of our more rational Presidents, Truman, decided to nuke two mainly civilian cities in order to spare American casualties in a direct assault. The US still has a policy of first use in case of need.
Ah, I see you're back to just using random statements as if they were some form of answer or rebuttal.
 
In my opinion, there will unfortunately be great violence before there is a diplomatic settlement. I think a cease fire and peace agreement could and should come fairly quickly.
 
Back