Russian Invasion of Ukraine

  • Thread starter Rage Racer
  • 10,148 comments
  • 612,789 views
So, what's the game plan? Invade, fail, then pull everyone back around the Donbas region to go, "Super duper military operation, totally not invade Ukraine, to save Donbas is great success. War over".
FOsi5JtX0CYEf8k.jpg
 
So, what's the game plan? Invade, fail, then pull everyone back around the Donbas region to go, "Super duper military operation, totally not invade Ukraine, to save Donbas is great success. War over".
"An attempt was made."
 
So, what's the game plan? Invade, fail, then pull everyone back around the Donbas region to go, "Super duper military operation, totally not invade Ukraine, to save Donbas is great success. War over".

Here's the inevitable 7-dimensional chess, pUT1n is a G3NIUS, post rationalization, just to get ahead of it:

The broader conflict and threats of escalation was just performative theater to make the annexation of Donbass, the real objective, feel like a good outcome for Ukraine & the West. I wouldn't put it past Putin's fanbase to handwave away the immense carnage in Ukraine and tremendous damage to Russian's armed forces and economy with such a tidy explanation.
 
Last edited:
Omg..!!!! (I would going to say if i was a believer)

And is on fox also...amazing..!!!
A bit old offcourse but nevertheless some truths.


Ironically, Col. Macgregor could have been an apologist for Hitler's Third Reich as it pursued its policy of re-militarizing the Rhineland, the Anschluss, the Sudetenland crisis, the invasion of Czechoslovakia, the Nazi-Soviet pact & the invasion of Poland.

As a communist enthusiast, you should perhaps read more about Macgregor's nationalist, pro-Iraq war, anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant views. He criticizes Germany for its pursuit of Vergangenheitsbewältigung - coming to terms with its Nazi past. It IS true that backing away from its militaristic history is what has left Germany - & therefore Europe - vulnerable to Russian expansionism, but that's an understandable reaction to the horror that was unleashed on Europe by German militarism under the Nazis.

It's also true that both Russia & Ukraine are both blighted by corruption & anti-democratic tendencies, however Putin launching a brutal invasion of Ukraine & forcibly annexing parts of the country to Russia is not going to do anything to improve the situation in either country.
 
So, what's the game plan? Invade, fail, then pull everyone back around the Donbas region to go, "Super duper military operation, totally not invade Ukraine, to save Donbas is great success. War over".
The Russians have not taken any major city like Kyviv, Odessa and Maruipol.

Despite gains. Not taken any major city will be a blow to their prestige which was already hit anyway.

Russian Paratroopers especially copped heavy casualties it will take decades for the VDV to regain its strength. 1 regiment already got wiped out with 1 soldier surviving.
 
Last edited:
It takes a long time for Russia to introduce new equipment.

They have so much stock they spend it on maintaining them or modernising them or keeping them storage if one day they might need it.

Russia also lacks drones and proper ew capabilities. What is crazy how Russia did not invest enough in countermeasures in countering javelins and nlaws. Russia is using the Orlan 10 and it is starting to prove its worth. Sukhoi S70 jet powered drone wont be operational until 2024. SU 57 has been declared operational but its still in production albeit going pretty slowly before Russia has considerable numbers of fifth gen jets.

When Russia itself knew even before the war as Ukraine was getting supplies of Javelins then there is countering the drones that Ukraine bought from Turkey.

Which genius thought about putting a stupid cage in a T72 or a T80 or the T90?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
SU 57 has been declared operational but its still in production albeit going pretty slowly before Russia has considerable numbers of fifth gen jets.
It doesn't matter how well su57 will be - all experienced pilots already downed by Ukrainian AA. Pilot training for fighter jet takes up to 7 years.
Russia also lacks drones and proper ew capabilities.
First of all it lack proper military communication system.
 
It doesn't matter how well su57 will be - all experienced pilots already downed by Ukrainian AA. Pilot training for fighter jet takes up to 7 years.

First of all it lack proper military communication system.
Yes thats true im surprised for decades I read so many articles how Russia was reforming and modernising its military after the debacle that was Georgia despite winning that war in 2008.
 
Yes thats true im surprised for decades I read so many articles how Russia was reforming and modernising its military after the debacle that was Georgia despite winning that war in 2008.
It was worse. I was serving in 2011 and communication at my high tech station looks like 30 y.o. All our regiment position was covered with goddamn wires.
 
Last edited:


Sea mines planted by both Ukraine and Russia have now reached the shores of Turkey.

This is a nightmare for everybody in the black sea.

Bosphorus strait has been closed for now.
 
Last edited:
A BBC piece about Ukrainian Nazis:



Putin's campaign of "De-Nazification" of Ukraine is destroying not just Ukraine, but Russia's economic future for years to come. This seems to have been a massive miscalculation on Putin's part.
 
It's plainly obvious that de-Nazification or de-Militarization of Ukraine was a false pretext for Russia's war - not even sure it was a pretext at all...more like a postext? They can barely even keep that story straight and it seem to come out of nowhere. One moment it's about NATO security guarantees for Russia, the next it's about protecting Russian minorities in eastern Ukraine, and then the next it's just about Nazis.

My question is...what was the honest reason for Russia invading Ukraine? I have some theories:

1. A political gamble for Putin to embellish his legacy and improve his domestic popularity by taking Ukraine - Glory of Russia
2. An economic opportunity to have more options to route natural gas into Europe without a middle man
3. Bolstering Crimea by taking enough territory to ensure water supplies flowed there
4. Adding black sea coastline to Russia
5. Bringing the historically/culturally important Kyiv back into Russia
6. Providing a strategic launch pad under Russian control for future ambitions, such as Poland and the Baltic states.
7. Demonstrating the might of Russia's military

In truth I think it was all of these things. It was a 19th century war hiding in the 21st. Just pure geopolitical ambition. Obviously not a list of justifiable reasons for a world leader in the 21s century to give. I think Putin realizes he might not have much time left and he wanted to improve his standing amongst Russian historical figures. It's a shame for the Ukrainian and also the Russian people and frightening that one man's ambition could have such enormous consequences.
 
BBC reporting another Russian general killed in Ukraine.
Ukraine's defence ministry says another Russian general, Lt Gen Yakov Rezantsev, was killed in a strike near the southern city of Kherson.

Rezantsev was the commander of Russia's 49th combined army.
A western official said he was the seventh general to die in Ukraine, and the second lieutenant general - the highest rank officer reportedly killed.
 
I don't agree with anything Rage Racer says. But his comments do help me humanize Russians in general. However flawed the logic, there is an attempt to apply logic.

However I do wonder why anyone would go to such lengths to "discuss" things in a place they know is not buying into the BS they are trying to spread. That part is weird. It would be like one of us going to a Russian forum and trying to spread our message there.
I guess it's a perspective thing, because all he's proven to me in this thread is that ordinary anti-Ukraine Russians are just as out of touch with reality and entitled to neighboring countries' business as the warhawks in the Kremlin. It's a chilling thought more than anything.
 
Apparently there are a bunch of Russians trying to get themselves to glow in the dark as they're digging themselves in and fortifying position in the exclusion zone around Chernobyl and in the Red Forest.

 
Last edited:
Apparently there are a bunch of Russians trying to get themselves to glow in the dark as they're digging themselves in and fortifying position in the exclusion zone around Chernobyl and in the Red Forest.

Either glow in the dark or get superpowers, whichever one sounds coolest.
 
Apparently there are a bunch of Russians trying to get themselves to glow in the dark as they're digging themselves in and fortifying position in the exclusion zone around Chernobyl and in the Red Forest.

Digging into ground which has been safely harboring radioactive particles for over three decades?

Nice.
 
Apparently there are a bunch of Russians trying to get themselves to glow in the dark as they're digging themselves in and fortifying position in the exclusion zone around Chernobyl and in the Red Forest.

So I'm not going on anything concrete here, but could the Russians be doing this in hopes that the Ukrainians overshoot their target and hit the defunct power plant? It seems like it would be right up Russia's alley to say "see, the Ukrainians are unleashing radiation on Europe, they're Nazis!"
 
I'm a lot less worried about radioactive dirt at Chernobyl than I am about global energy, fertilizer and food prices, which I expect to rise by at least 20% due to this invasion. I expect the Russian invaders currently in the vicinity of Kiev to retreat to more defensible positions in the immediate future.
 
Back