Russian Invasion of Ukraine

  • Thread starter Rage Racer
  • 10,148 comments
  • 614,148 views
So what should we do with that "whoever does not miss the Soviet Union has no heart. Whoever wants it back has no brain" quote from Putin?


You say maybe defenses were off, I say they probably were out of comission.
People underestimate what a debilitating effect Russia’s notorious corruption has had on their military. I’m sure most if not all of the defensive systems on the Moskva were down due to delayed maintenance and/or lack of parts because the money to pay for them instead went to paying for the generals and admirals multi-million dollar Black Sea villas and beautiful mistresses with their downtown Moscow penthouse apartments.
 
People underestimate what a debilitating effect Russia’s notorious corruption has had on their military. I’m sure most if not all of the defensive systems on the Moskva were down due to delayed maintenance and/or lack of parts because the money to pay for them instead went to paying for the generals and admirals multi-million dollar Black Sea villas and beautiful mistresses with their downtown Moscow penthouse apartments.
Don't think so. Its flagman, after all. Crew could be unprepared and trained bad, but all systems, most likely, worked well. Even when I was at service, all our our equipment was working well. And it was in 2010, when army budget was lower.
 
Don't think so. Its flagman, after all. Crew could be unprepared and trained bad, but all systems, most likely, worked well. Even when I was at service, all our our equipment was working well. And it was in 2010, when army budget was lower.
In 2007 there was a new Minister of Defense named Serdyukov. He reformed the military, improved it and modernized it. To do that, he had to shut down the rampant corruption and block powerful people and interest groups. If you were in the army in 2010, then you would have seen the results of all this reforming.

The problem was that the generals, admirals and defense contractors hated it. All that sweet grift had dried up. Serdyoku became very unpopular, so he was replaced in 2012 by a new minister, Shoygu. He was a man who knew how to work the system, having avoided every single political purge for 20 years. He knew the best way to not make enemies of powerful people and interest groups was to give them what they wanted. And what they wanted was a return to the old corruption so they could get their slice., and he gave it to them.

So yes, I fully believe the Moskva sank because, despite its status as a flagship, it was unfit for frontline duty due to corruption leaving it defenseless.
 
Last edited:
What happened to the Moskva is surprising, but it's not something that other militaries can claim immunity from. The situation is kind of similar to the USS Stark Incident, although it's slightly (only slightly) more understandable why the Stark's defenses were shut off as technically it wasn't at war:
Even with everything switched on in both cases, the USS Stark is still a far less armed vessel, compared to the Moskva. For comparison, Moskva has 6 CIWS, while Stark only has 1. For anti-air missiles, Stark can only launch one at a time, as it only has 1 ready to launch, while the Moskva has a VLS with multiple Grumbles, and two OSA-M launchers. It's still weird how only two missiles were able to breach through all those defences. OHP frigates, are not meant to operate alone, while the Moskva should be able to do it atleast to some extent.

I shouldn't be by now but I'm amazed at the incompetence of Russia's armed forces. The Moskva was equipped with lots of sophisticated defence systems; radar, SAMs, chaff, electronic jamming and conventional weapons if anything gets too close. Using the facts best known, to have not known or seen that two anti-ship missiles were incoming means that:

The radar was turned off (what a dumbass)
The missiles weren't prepped (what a dumbass)
The chaff wasn't deployed (what a dumbass)
The jamming wasn't engaged (what a dumbass)
The conventional weaponry wasn't used (what a dumbass)

Considering this vessel was in an active warzone, either the above is true or it was all switched on but the crew was so unprepared that they weren't trained on how to use them. It is staggering that something like this happened so easily. I read that if faced with a battery of anti-ship missiles, the Moskva should be able to destroy or disable 6-8 of them. Instead, 2 missiles sailed right up and sent the Russia Federation's Black Sea flagship right into the ground very easily.
It's hard to say what went wrong (or what went right, for the ukrainian side!).
There are a few theories, that range from an american P-8 giving target location to the ukrainian forces, to allow them to fire the missiles from such a long range, to claims that UKR used drones to confuse it's radars, maybe jamming was part of it, who knows. Given that the Moskva was a powerful but old ship, doubt it has much resistence to modern EW systems. The AK630 CIWS is (or can be) automatic. Doubt they would use it manually to intercept incoming missiles. We also don't know how many missiles were fired against the ship, each Neptune launcher has 4 missiles ready to fire, which could have been fire, with half of them being intercepted.

Maybe in the future we will know the complete declassified truth.
 
Yes, that was the reason given for his dismissal.
All his biography is clear example of nepotism and corruption. Some parts of his reformations were good, some bad, but he is clearly a typical Putin functionary. And he isnt better than Shoigu.
 
We don't know what happened. Most likely its result of underestimation of enemy which is result of 8 years of propoganda. Tail wagging the dog.
Not every detail is available to us, but the fact that the ship sunk at all raises flags. It was far from lacking defensive capability and its entire purpose for being in the region was to provide naval protection. Even if the enemy was underestimated, you'd expect some kind of response to their presence. As soon as the drone was detected, some kind of defense system should have been activated.
Even with everything switched on in both cases,
They are different ships yes, but the point was more to show examples of overly lax crew in a dangerous situation. I think in both cases, ship defenses should have been more alert.
 
I haven't watched the video, but judging by the comments going, "MSM is afraid to report this!", "I'm showing this to everyone who unfriended me for being pro-Russia", & a bunch of fringe-conservative reactions, I'm gonna guess Kim might as well be on the Daily Wire.

Edit* Oh lord, her social media is exactly that. Right-wing spew.

I hate Twitter and their increasing censorship antics which is one reason I no longer have an account on that platform. I have decided to add my independent progressive perspective to Parler. Please come join me!
LMAO. Sorry to go off-topic, just have to point out she's another right-wing dummy crying about censorship, but is still on main social media platforms b/c once again, no one sane is on the Conservative wastelands of social media. She even tries the Tim Pool route of being a former "progressive". I have no doubt that video is dog **** now if it's from her reporting.
 
Last edited:
I didn't know anybody was actually studying the proliferation of this logo or that it had become this widespread, I just thought it was weird and connected the dots lol. This Vox video is the first video I've seen on the subject.

 
RF,Bryansk, fuel tanks.
IMG_20220425_082341_183.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think this is really what is going on:

Ukraine war: US wants to see a weakened Russia​



Putin made a big miscalculation in starting this war. It's a disaster for Ukraine, of course, but it's also a strategic disaster for Russia.
Russia finds itself isolated, discredited & economically & militarily weakened, which is what the US has been aiming for all along. The only card Putin has left to play is the most desperate one of all: nuclear escalation.
 
Russia finds itself isolated, discredited & economically & militarily weakened, which is what the US has been aiming for all along.
Is it? Our previous president didn't seem to be working to that end.

The nuclear escalation card is only on the table because Putin is a maniac.
 
Man, what a ****storm I caused with my comments about Katyn. :D
Sorry if I don't respond to all of you, my time for forum wars is limited.
Why do you always seem to forget this bit...

"President Viktor Yanukovych declared the award illegal, since Bandera was never a citizen of Ukraine, a stipulation necessary for getting the award. This announcement was confirmed by a court decision in April 2010.[20] In January 2011, the award was officially annulled.[21] A proposal to confer the award on Bandera was rejected by the Ukrainian parliament in August 2019"

... It was done by an outgoing president and removed less than three months later by the incoming president.

But just to remind you again, 0.006% of the armed forces and less than 2% of the vote.
Okay, but who are all these people then, marching across cities of Ukraine every 1st of January? Putin's undercover agents with torchlights?
1609527451-2219.jpg


And I'll remind that Kyiv and other cities of Ukraine have streets named after this person.

Not a fan of ultranationalist thing, but its another Kremlin bull****. Partnership between ounb and Germany was broken 8 days after invasion in Ukraine. Bandera was sent to jail by Nazis. Pre war there was some alliance against communist regime and Poland occupation (part of current Ukraine was under Poland), but guess who else has alliance with Nazis against Poland. And its not ordinary thing to call Stalin a nazi.
You're missing the Schutzmannschaft Bataillon 201, that was once commanded by Roman Shukhevych (another national hero of Ukraine), subordinated to SS and formed from Nachtigal and Roland battalions that mostly consisted of OUN-B members. This time they were the official part of German forces.

Ukraine had real heroes in its history, but of all of them it chose these scumbags to be proud of. If this was all just to say "**** you" to Russians, they were 100% successful with that.

cannot access Twitter and the like (or at least, not easily)
Getting accurate readings from Russia itself is also a bit difficult
What's difficult in installing VPN and turning it on? I'm used to this a long time ago, since I started playing one Japanese browser game that requires a Japanese IP for access.
That doesn't stop ordinary internet users from discussing and criticising the Russian operation. @Liquid had never been on those Russian forums and social media but judges about them like he's an expert who knows more about RuNet than its actual users.
Russian government aggressively putting out propaganda to paint a completely different picture of their invasion
And you think Ukraine or West behave any differently here? Are you sure their propaganda doesn't lie or distort facts? I can provide examples if you want.
Wars aren't fought without propaganda. It's been like that for hundreds of years.
OHTJhbiPbvaMPtwuujV39J1C9aNYk9LIz2-9DqaKyN3zXaxxHnUlqK2bYFNgkB-WS6G7EdHKvrzJPyqJyoV6B5Fp.jpg

That really isn't the "gotcha" that you think it is. Are you still able to do that using a regular internet connection without using a VPN, yes or no?
No, but how does it stop me from reading Facebook, Twitter or other blocked sources?
TBH, the fact that there are Soviet statues in Poland is very weird
It's the memory of Russian (and also Ukrainian, Belorussian, Tatar, Kazakh, Armenian, Jewish and of many other ethnicities of the USSR) soldiers who fought the Nazis in Poland and sacrificed their lives in the process, not of the communist regime. These are different things, is it so hard to understand?
considering that the Soviets invaded Poland in conjunction with the Nazis, that Stalin knew about the Warsaw Uprising and allowed it to fail (resulting in the near-total destruction of Warsaw itself and the deportation of Jewish civilians to Treblinka and Majdanek), and the aforementioned Katyn massacre, which was carried out during Stalin's purges, discovered by the Nazis of all people (pg 244), and when the Polish Government-In-Exile asked for it to be investigated, Stalin basically told them to piss off and cut off all diplomatic relations, with the Soviet government continuing to cover-up the story until 1990.
No need to lecture me on history, I knew it all long before I started this thread.

It was explainable that USSR covered up the real story of Katyn during the war - it was not the best time to quarrel with the allies. The US also did their own investigation, but they kept the results in secret until the Cold War.

Also I find it funny how Poles first say "You invaded us, we didn't ask you to liberate us!" but then "You didn't help us during the Warsaw uprising!". Oh, but you guys said "Polska strong" and that you could have liberated yourself on your own, so why all those complaints about Warsaw, mmm?

Indeed there is a theory that Red Army waited on purpose for the Polish resistance (the main force of which was Armia Krajowa, that was hostile to Nazis and Soviets alike) to be wiped out by the Germans, because AK would be the next enemy after the defeat of Nazis, and would possibly shoot the Russians in the back after the capture of Warsaw. However, the more official story says that the Soviet troops of the 1st Belorussian Front (commanded by Marshal Konstantin Rokossowski, who was an ethnic Pole, by the way) had to pull up reserves and supply lines before assaulting the Polish capital, but the Soviet Air Force did provide support by dropping supplies to the Polish partisans.
And what's bad about it?
Sanctions are a game that can be played PvP. Poland was the earlier one to impose sanctions, and its disrespect to the memory of Soviet soldiers is more than a justified reason for Russia to retaliate. No need to expect RF to leave it unanswered.
It still doesn't justify the active aggression that Russia is wielding against Ukraine
I didn't say it does.
Are you honestly of the view that Russia is viewed favourable by the majority of Poles?
No, why'd you think I believe so?
I am well aware that Poland is a historic enemy of Russia, for over 400 years at least. Many Poles dislike Russia nowadays for things happened a long time ago, and my feelings toward the Polish state are mutual.
You forgot to mention that it took until 1990 for Russia to even acknowledge that Katyn was a massacre carried out by Russians
Yes, and?
post WW2 Russia annexed parts of Eastern Poland
More like, moved Poland a bit to the west.
yejv9eyl9ub51.jpg
After the WWII, the USSR took a lot more lands from Germany than just East Prussia (where Koenigsberg became Kaliningrad), but Stalin gave them to Poland as a compensation for the East Kresy (Galicia, Volhynia, etc). This is how Stettin became Szczecin, Danzig became Gdansk, Breslau became Wroclaw and so on.

And look who still occupies the illegally annexed Polish lands with cities of Lwow (now Lviv), Tarnopol (Ternopil), Stanislawow (Ivano-Frankivsk). It's Ukraine! Not Russia.

What an irony - the communists Ukraine hates so much were the ones who made Ukraine so big.
I dont want to sound anti Russian but the Soviets green lighted the German invasion of Poland by signing a non aggression pact after that they joined in the invasion alongside the Nazis to get themselves a piece.

Nazis and the Soviets did a military parade together when they captured Poland.

Nobody denies the contribution the Soviets did in defeating Nazi Germany but also another aspect needs to be looked in how they collarborated and signed agreements with the Nazis also how they shared countries that they were going to invade. Soviets did not invade Finland, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania for no reason they saw it as part of their territory in the molotov-ribbentrop pact that they were allowed to take as Nazi Germany wont be bothering them as long as the Soviets allow them to take Poland.

Soviets were literally complicit in starting world war 2.
Excuse me, why should the Soviets have RED lighted the German invasion of Poland?

Poland didn't want to be protected by the Soviets - shortly before WWII, the USSR suggested Poland to form an alliance against Germany, but Poland rejected. A lot of other European powers had signed non-agression treaties with Germany (including Poland!), no need to forget that when blaming the USSR for Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. Poland also annexed a part of Czechoslovakia when Britain and France fed it to Hitler in Munich, '38. So, if you say USSR was a German ally before the war, then Poland was, too.

The Soviet invasion of Poland in September 1939 happened 16 days later than the German, and by that time, Polish army was already done for. The government already ran away, and the Red Army barely faced any resistance when they stepped into Poland.

Was the USSR nobly defending Poland from the Nazis, as some people think? No. The Soviets acted under their own interests, to seize these lands to be an extra 'bumper' for the future invasion from the west. There's nothing noble about it - its like taking shoes from a dead man (Poland was already dead as a state by September, 17th). Still, it wouldn't be better for anyone if Nazis captured these territories instead (especially the Jews, who were a large part of Lwow population).
aKmYvxg_460s.jpg


Looks like the saboteurs had a great day.

Edit.

a91X55D_460s.jpg
Sorry to disappoint you, but this photo is 4 days old. The locomotive derailed because of eroded ground under the rails.
wr-960.webp

It was a single locomotive, but Ukrainian propaganda says it carried 'military equipment and ammunition'. Well, there must be a lot of ammo a single locomotive can carry...

No wonder - they're in desperate need for victories to claim. And it works on people who don't bother even google-searching the image.
 
I think this is really what is going on:

Ukraine war: US wants to see a weakened Russia​



Putin made a big miscalculation in starting this war. It's a disaster for Ukraine, of course, but it's also a strategic disaster for Russia.
Russia finds itself isolated, discredited & economically & militarily weakened, which is what the US has been aiming for all along. The only card Putin has left to play is the most desperate one of all: nuclear escalation.

Is it? Our previous president didn't seem to be working to that end.

The nuclear escalation card is only on the table because Putin is a maniac.

True. I'm talking post Trump.
Trump was working about as close to unilaterally as an American president possibly could and it is worrying how much he was able to influence policy toward Russia. But as far as I can tell, post-Trump our policy toward Russia has reverted back to normal which is a lot of skepticism and worry about the poor and aggressive decisions Russian leadership have a habit of making.

But @Biggles the way you type it reads as though it's bad thing the US has been "aiming for it all along". You've been watching them many more years than I have so you know the context which is that Russian leadership are assholes and are addicted to provocation and escalation. We basically have to hope for a weakened Russia because Russia is unpredictable and insatiable. Even if they had remained stable, peaceful, and had established a successful presence in the world market there is still zero precedent to suggest they'd be satisfied by that or that it would convince them to remain peaceful. As far as our history books go back, Russian leadership has never been satisfied with what they had, even when what they had was pretty good.

More like, moved Poland a bit to the west.
:lol: Jesus Christ in a hard hat, if only surveying international borders were as easy as moving things a bit. I guess Russia is trying to move Ukraine a bit to the northwest, right? They're trying to scooch in like they've got an extended warranty to sell.
 
Last edited:
Trump was working about as close to unilaterally as an American president possibly could and it is worrying how much he was able to influence policy toward Russia. But as far as I can tell, post-Trump our policy toward Russia has reverted back to normal which is a lot of skepticism and worry about the poor and aggressive decisions Russian leadership have a habit of making.

But @Biggles the way you type it reads as though it's bad thing the US has been "aiming for it all along". You've been watching them many more years than I have so you know the context which is that Russian leadership are assholes and are addicted to provocation and escalation. We basically have to hope for a weakened Russia because Russia is unpredictable and insatiable. Even if they had remained stable, peaceful, and had established a successful presence in the world market there is still zero precedent to suggest they'd be satisfied by that or that it would convince them to remain peaceful. As far as our history books go back, Russian leadership has never been satisfied with what they had, even when what they had was pretty good.


:lol: Jesus Christ in a hard hat, if only surveying international borders were as easy as moving things a bit. I guess Russia is trying to move Ukraine a bit to the northwest, right?
Yes - realistically. I'm not sure anyone planning for the US could really have anticipated how much resistance the Ukrainians would muster ... and how apparently inept the invasion by the Russians would be. So, the "all along" is perhaps more "in the last few weeks", where they must have been weighing their response. The chosen option seems to have been to provide the Ukrainians with enough weapons to stall the Russian attack while avoiding direct military involvement. It's a bit like supplying weapons to the Afghans back in the Reagan years. It's in the interests of the US & Western Europe to see Russia deplete its resources in a military operation that drags on.

The longer term "all along" would be the Russian's perspective of the US (& other western nations) constantly working to undermine Russia's position - both in the Soviet era & post. This is a perspective shared (I suppose) by other significant players on the world stage - like China & India - who don't like the idea of the US being in a position to dictate to the rest of the world & prefer a "multi-polar" world in which they would be able to control their own spheres of influence. It's a complicated world & doesn't seem to be getting any less complicated - regional powers butt up against smaller neighbouring countries with their own agendas.
 
Last edited:
& prefer a "multi-polar" world in which they would be able to control their own spheres of influence
China doesn't want to play nice. Look a little bit to the south of China at Australia. Is Australia wanting to see Russia succeed at invading Ukraine because it wants the US to be threatened by Russian power? No, because Australia doesn't mind playing nice.

By playing nice, I don't mean capitulating to US demands, I mean Australia isn't looking to annex Taiwan.
 
It was a single locomotive, but Ukrainian propaganda says it carried 'military equipment and ammunition'. Well, there must be a lot of ammo a single locomotive can carry...
Pretty sure that the thing Dennisch posted said "railway." I dunno about you, but that railway looks pretty 🤬 to me even if the cause was more Russian government incompetence rather than action by Ukrainian military forces. If that railway carried military equipment and ammunition, I'm suspecting it will be a while before it can again.


Are we supposed to believe that in addition to being incapable of saying anything that the Russian government didn't approve of first (in spite of how much you're trying to brag that you can bypass the restrictions in place) that you can't read either?
 
Last edited:
Sorry to disappoint you, but this photo is 4 days old. The locomotive derailed because of eroded ground under the rails.
So what you're saying is Russians don't even take decent care of their own infrastructure?

Another reason to join NATO and defend every last bit of territory from your lot - wouldn't want it to fall into that same level of disrepair in their hands.
 
It's the memory of Russian (and also Ukrainian, Belorussian, Tatar, Kazakh, Armenian, Jewish and of many other ethnicities of the USSR) soldiers who fought the Nazis in Poland and sacrificed their lives in the process, not of the communist regime. These are different things, is it so hard to understand?
This may come as a bit of a shock, but it's pretty hard to like Russian soldiers in light of recent events. For people who have endured decades of Soviet oppression I imagine it's even harder.

Sure, some of the soldiers fighting in Poland were probably heroes, but you've done a pretty good job at desecrating their memory and you only have yourself to blame for that.
 
Back