- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
Right. I assume the logic behind that law was to make life easier for people who speak those other languages. Russian and Ukrainian are different enough that they are recognised as individual languages. Recognising those other languages as official languages would enable them to be used in a formal capacity. For example, if a school was predominantly made up of ethnic Russians, then that law would allow those schools to teach classes in Russian. I know first-hand the challenges of teaching across a language barrier - I have taught in schools with sixty-nine different languages among the students.I'll try to explain. For some time there have been a law in Ukraine that allowed certain regions to have other languages than Ukrainian as their official language. Recently, the newly "adjusted" parliament voted for that law to be repelled, making quite a few people unhappy. After that, acting president Turchinov vetoed that decision.
I am guessing that the fact the interim government was willing to consider repealing that law at all would have been extremely unpopular - it would have been perceived as the interim government abandoning the Russian population. Even if Turchinov vetoed the vote, the interim government has existed for little more than a week. Repealing the law was one of the first things they did. It would not inspire a lot of confidence in the Russian-speaking population.
And while they obviously want to wash away the stink of corruption from Yanukovych's reign, repealing a law that improved the quality of life for some without impacting the quality of life for others seems like a strange way to do that. It's like the assumed everything Yanukovych did was wrong simply because he did it.