Scottish Independence

Do you support Scotland's independence?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 45.7%
  • No

    Votes: 10 28.6%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 5 14.3%
  • Don't care

    Votes: 4 11.4%

  • Total voters
    35
So if NI leaves it could still be the UK, as in "United Kingdom of Great Britain"?

Yes. And no. (Sorry @Tired Tyres :) ).

Great Britain (formed by the Act of Union, a kind of forced marriage between Scotland and England) would cease to be. We'd be the United Kingdom of England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Until those Welsh buggers go. Then it'll be the Cornish, currently too sluggish on warm air and pasties to think straight. Then, finally, in a triumphant chorus of clogs and Jerusalem the great county of Yorkshire will wrench free of its soft, southern, shandy-sloshing masters and stand bellowing astride the Pennines like a reet'un.

Anyway, eventually the UK will be so shrunken and insignificant that it'll be referred to as a single dot, or similar :D

The flag wouldn't likely change though - it already lacks one UK constituent country and contains one that hasn't been in the UK for nearly 100 years. We might get to put a white rose on it, but the right way up, not like those western hairybacks.
 
Haha, no. It's more likely that Wales will become the new Cornwall. And much like the England and Wales Cricket Board, the "and Wales" bit will just be forgotten bit by bit. :indiff:
I reckon we can expect to see an upsurge in support for Welsh independence depending on how much of a dog's breakfast the Tories make of Brexit. Scotland could prove to be a bellwether for Wales...
 
I reckon we can expect to see an upsurge in support for Welsh independence depending on how much of a dog's breakfast the Tories make of Brexit. Scotland could prove to be a bellwether for Wales...

Given the local authority breakdown in the membership referendum, I'm sadly not so confident:

Link because image won't load

Only 5 out of 22 "principal areas" (or whatever they're called this week) voted to remain and three of those five by small margins. The irony of Wales almost certainly not getting its EU funding maintained by Westminster has not yet woken us up.

I've always been enamoured yet envious of the fire in Ireland and Scotland with regards to independence and/or devolution. For whatever reason it's a fight which in Wales is not as strong as it could be and not as strong as it should be.

But I don't want to get sidetracked in this thread specifically so I'll leave it at that.
 
It was my staff away day yesterday and I ended up in the pub with a couple of girls from work. They came with me to a new pub where I was meeting some non-work friends, and it ended up being a nice mixture and everyone was having a laugh. One of the girls from work stayed for quite a while, and it was all going well until she made a comment about the BBC "lying" and claimed that they were biased against the SNP. Talking politics in the pub never ends well, but she was assuming that me and my friends were all SNP supporters, when in fact none of us are - indeed, it was like a red rag to a bull to one of my friends. The penny dropped pretty quickly and the girl from work went bright red and said 'Oh, I thought you'd be pro-independence!', which met with a stony, 'Erm, we'll all be out of a job in an independent Scotland, so no...'. She left soon after, and we spent the next ten minutes trying to calm one of my friends down, because the whole independence debate is a very touchy subject for him. It was a real shame because it had been a really nice evening until that point, but it just goes to show just how divisive the prospect of a second referendum is. To be fair, the girl from work did make a bit of a mistake by a) bringing up a touchy subject in the pub, b) assuming we would all be on her side of the argument (when infact none of us were) and, to make matters worse, c) failed to drop the subject and continued to argue with one of my mates who was clearly getting worked up by it... in other words, it was a classic case of having a few too many drinks with people you don't know turning out badly.

On a related note, the Conservatives have beaten Labour into second place in the Scottish council elections on Thursday, with the Tories more than doubling their councillors in Scotland, presumably in response to the collapse of Labour under Jeremy Corbyn and the level of distaste at the SNP pushing for a second independence referendum.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/8201e79d-41c0-48f1-b15c-d7043ac30517/scotland-local-elections-2017
 
And quite possibly another general election at practically any time. It would take very little for the current government to fall (literally 3 or 4 byelection losses for the Tories or DUP and Sinn Fein turning up for a no-confidence vote (7 or 8 if Sinn Fein don't, if I remember correctly), and that's if the DUP-Tory deal stays put or the Tories don't bring an early election about themselves).

Voting fatigue is really going to kick in soon for a lot of people. Another referendum is probably the last thing anyone wants.
 
Sinn Fein turning up for a no-confidence vote

It it hasn't happened now, I doubt it will ever happen. So yeah, I think it's 7 MPs the Tories would need to lose before they're in trouble.

Voting fatigue is really going to kick in soon for a lot of people.

I'm kinda sceptical about what impact voter fatigure really has. In Nothern Ireland voters have gone to the polls 6 times in the past 4 years, but turnout for the assembly/Westminster elections this year were the highest they've been for ~15 years.
 
It it hasn't happened now, I doubt it will ever happen.

Neither do I, but it serves as a reminder of how fragile the government is, and with the DUP holding the balance of power I'd still not completely discount it. More realistically I can see the current setup leading to dissent on the Tory backbenches which could effectively make the government very weak outside of all but the most important votes. Regardless, with the timetable for the next general election uncertain, holding another Scottish referendum would seem irrational and self-defeating.

Personally I think that a strong case now exists for Scottish Independence, following the EU vote, although I'm still on the fence as to whether or not I would actually support it. Scotland now has a lot less to lose (and potentially a fair amount to gain) by leaving the UK, but fundementally I find myself opposed to any kind of nationalism; even if it is the moderate, reasonable kind seen in Scotland driven by a desire for self-determination rather than bigotry. I think ultimately I'd rather live in a UK with Scotland rather than one without, but maybe that's just me being an Englander who wishes they had more friends.

I'm kinda sceptical about what impact voter fatigure really has.

I think it depends on the context. I think a 3rd referendum might drive a lot of people to apathy in a way that regular polls for parliament or whatever don't.
 
A few hours spread out over 4 years is a heavy burden:lol:
In all seriousness though, the Scottish independence referendum and the Brexit referendum were stressful for a lot of people, albeit for different reasons. I found the former particularly stressful, not least since it became both an unavoidable topic of conversation and a topic that needed to be avoided at the same time - many friendships were tested to breaking point, both in the long run up and the even longer aftermath of the referendum, and it remains a touchy subject in all aspects of life (e.g. work, pub). Fortunately most of my friends and family were on the same side, but it quickly became apparent who you could have a friendly discussion about it with (usually people on the same side of the debate) and who you would rather not speak to about the subject - see my post from a few weeks ago to see that it is still a bad idea to bring up the independence referendum in the pub :ill:

So it's not so much voting fatigue as it is campaign fatigue - and it is a genuine, physical fatigue... the actual mental stress of dealing with such big questions is something that I can easily live without for at least another ten years.
 
One question I have, @Touring Mars .. if we did get another [Brexit] extension, what would the chances of a) Scotland getting Indyref2, and b) Voting for it, and c) is it thought this would leave them in the EU by default, or would they have to apply?
I think the chances of another Scottish independence referendum (Indyref 2) are extremely high unless the UK either remains in the EU or agrees a deal that keeps us in the Single Market and Customs Union (soft Brexit). Like the last time, I believe the UK Government would have little choice but to agree to a referendum eventually.

The chances of Scotland voting for independence in a second referendum, however, is less clear. It would depend largely on what the rationale for holding another referendum was - and the only reason there is any talk of another one so soon after the last one is because of the possibility of Scotland losing its EU membership. Should that not transpire, there is (IMO) not only no chance of Scotland voting in favour of independence, there is also no rationale for even holding another vote.

As for an independent Scotland's possible future EU membership, I can't see any other circumstance other than Scotland having to apply as a sovereign state. Scotland, by virtue of already being in the EU, would have a flying start in meeting the 'Copenhagen criteria' (for EU membership), but it would remain necessary for a full assessment to be done on whether Scotland meets them all, esp. economically. That said, I have no doubt that the EU (and all remaining EU27 member states) would bend over backwards to accept Scotland into the fold, even if it had to bend a few rules...

But I reckon this issue is comparatively small beer compared to the real problem with Scotland's possible EU membership - and it basically boils down to Scotland's future relationship with the remainder of the UK (rUK). The whole situation would be like Brexit in reverse, but an order of magnitude more complicated. Just as the UK is having a hard time leaving because it's future relationship with the EU is uncertain, a similar thing would apply in reverse to Scotland wanting to join the EU.

The EU would require a hard border between Scotland and England for a start - while many nationalists (on both sides of the border) might welcome such an idea, that alone would spell economic trouble for Scotland... not least because England is a land bridge between Scotland and mainland Europe. Politically it would be dynamite as well. The point is, however, that this (and many other things, like agreeing Scotland's share of the national debt, carving up the NHS, North Sea oil, the army, the National Grid etc. etc.) would have to be agreed with the UK in advance of Scotland joining the EU, because otherwise it will not be possible to assess whether Scotland meets the criteria for EU membership, or whether it will be able to protect the integrity of the EU single market.

If Scotland were allowed into the EU prior to finalising its 'Scexit' terms with the UK, then Scotland would 'crash out' of the newly-established UK internal Single Market (which is worth 4 times more in terms of trade than the EU Single Market) and then face trading with rUK with huge tariffs (in the event of a No Deal exit and no existing trade deal with the EU). This would, in all likelihood, cripple the Scottish economy. The question would then be, why would the EU allow Scotland into the fold knowing that Scotland could become the next Greece? And, if a tariff-free trade deal between the UK and EU does (somehow) emerge that keeps things pretty much as they are today, then why would Scotland need to leave the UK at all?

-

I personally believe that the parallels between SNP supporters and hard Brexiteers are far stronger than most supporters of Scottish independence would care to admit. Indeed, the parallels between 'Scexit' and 'Brexit' are (IMO anyway) obvious - opponents who raise concerns or point out inconvenient facts that will make the process far harder in reality are simply labelled as 'Project Fear'.

Paradoxically, Scottish nationalists seem to view the prospect of a disastrous Brexit as the ultimate justification for Scexit, while the rest of us see it as the exact opposite.
 
Last edited:
Do you guys think if UK had a system like a primary where you can choose the head of each party and they can’t dispose them unless they do another primary would fix the crappy flawed system that can’t produce an answer to this dilemma?
 
Do you guys think if UK had a system like a primary where you can choose the head of each party and they can’t dispose them unless they do another primary would fix the crappy flawed system that can’t produce an answer to this dilemma?

No, they'd still require a party majority. It would also mean two elections at election time - the General Election to return representatives to the House and then a Prime Ministerial election to choose which of those from each party would lead their party. That's presuming that we required a party leader to be an elected representative, which I think should be a given.
 
And so, the SNP roar to victory in the 2019 UK General Election with a thumping 45% of the popular vote (where have we seen that number before?!) and are now going to demand a second independence referendum.

Of course, the fly in the ointment is a large Conservative majority in Westminster who are implacably opposed to Scottish independence and who will resist calls for a(nother) referendum, citing the fact that it has only been 5 years since the last one.

But, there is at least some justification for another vote - Brexit. One of the most compelling and decisive factors in the previous referendum was membership of the EU. Scottish independence was (correctly) perceived as a threat to Scotland's EU membership, but the UK's decision to leave the EU has turned the argument on its head. Ironically, far from putting our EU membership at risk, Scottish independence is now the only route to Scotland remaining inside the EU.

But Scotland could now face a stark choice - between staying in the UK but crashing out of the EU, or vice versa. Unless the UK and the EU agree to a 'future relationship' (e.g. trade deal) that effectively keeps the whole of the UK inside the EU's Single Market (and hence also its legal orbit), then Scotland faces this stark choice - and what are the chances of the UK agreeing to a trade deal that effectively scuppers the main goals of Brexit? (my guess is very low...)

The biggest problem for Scotland as far as I can see is that leaving the UK will likely be immensely more costly to Scotland than even leaving the EU. Indeed, there is a third option to the two outlined above, and that is being out of both the UK and the EU. This is the risk that supporters of Scottish independence dare not mention.

It is a no-brainer that the EU would love to have an independent Scotland as a member state - I don't think that is even remotely questioned. But the question is, how and when could the EU allow an independent Scotland to become a member state? It is not just a question of political will, but one of political, social and economic reality - Scotland cannot be a member state of the EU until it is itself a nation state...
 
But the question is, how and when could the EU allow an independent Scotland to become a member state?

Rebuild and fortify Hadrian's wall, annex the part of Northern England that's North of the wall as punishment for their foolish voting. Then you call the EU to make it happen without any further crooked teeth nonsense.
 
Rebuild and fortify Hadrian's wall, annex the part of Northern England that's North of the wall as punishment for their foolish voting. Then you call the EU to make it happen without any further crooked teeth nonsense.
As someone who lives 400 m north of Hadrians Wall I wouldn't see that as a punishment!
 
I don't really understand the opposition to leaving presented by Johnson and Corbyn. This is much more peaceful dispute than with Northern Ireland, and unless Scotland leaving is predicted to drastically hinder the rest of the Union as much as themselves why not just let them do it?
 
I don't really understand the opposition to leaving presented by Johnson and Corbyn. This is much more peaceful dispute than with Northern Ireland, and unless Scotland leaving is predicted to drastically hinder the rest of the Union as much as themselves why not just let them do it?
If everyone in Scotland turned out to demonstrate with banners saying "we want a referendum" they'd get one. If a politician asks for one Westminster will say no.
 
Rebuild and fortify Hadrian's wall, annex the part of Northern England that's North of the wall as punishment for their foolish voting. Then you call the EU to make it happen without any further crooked teeth nonsense.

Hadrian's Wall was more of a military motorway, it was open for crossing by traders and farmers from either side... but there's no way this government will fix any transport infrastructure that far north! :)

And they won't have heard of the Antonine because they don't teach that in Classics :D
 
Hadrian's Wall was more of a military motorway, it was open for crossing by traders and farmers from either side... but there's no way this government will fix any transport infrastructure that far north! :)

That is why the other government needs to go south to fix infrastructure.
 
Is Scotland becoming independent actually possible? Won't Boris just block the vote everytime?
Not taking any sides, just curious as I'm a bit confused on this topic.
 
Is Scotland becoming independent actually possible? Won't Boris just block the vote everytime?
Not taking any sides, just curious as I'm a bit confused on this topic.

It's an interesting topic, and aside from Brexit, might be the next big thing ol' Bozza the wiff-waff-er has to worry about.

Personally, I'm easy either way, I feel sorry for the Scottish in all this Brexit malarky, I've already heard a lot of hypocrisy from people that will die on the cross for leaving the EU, but are appalled by the concept of indyref2.
 
Is Scotland becoming independent actually possible? Won't Boris just block the vote everytime?
Not taking any sides, just curious as I'm a bit confused on this topic.
I've moved your post to our thread on the subject.

Technically, the Scottish government cannot hold a legal referendum without 'permission' from Westminster (which I assume means an Act of Parliament to that effect), so yes, Johnson/the Conservatives could easily block such a move - but they can't block it forever. If the UK Government were to persistently block another referendum, we could expect to see more and more civil unrest, acts of disobedience etc. and possibly Scotland going down a similar route to Catalonia where independence politicians have even been jailed...

The UK Government called it correctly the last time and allowed a referendum, in the hope that it would legally resolve the question for 'a generation'. At the time, the nationalists had no answers - they had no choice but to suck it up because the referendum result was clear and they lost.

Unfortunately, though, Brexit came and changed everything. Scotland now faces a really tough dilemma, but even as someone who voted against Scottish independence myself, I believe that there is now a very strong case for another referendum and allowing the people of Scotland another chance to decide.

If the UK government decide to block a referendum, then there will be an illegal referendum and that could easily lead down a dangerous path.

The best plan by far would be for the UK government to allow another referendum and put their money where their mouths are and make the case for the Union in a post-Brexit future... though, personally, I reckon they will have a very hard time doing that.

Of course, a referendum is just the first part of what will be a long and arduous journey for supporters of independence - Scexit will make Brexit look like a walk in the park, so the UK Government may decide that a referendum is the least of their worries and save their energy for beyond that point.
 
I've moved your post to our thread on the subject.

Technically, the Scottish government cannot hold a legal referendum without 'permission' from Westminster (which I assume means an Act of Parliament to that effect), so yes, Johnson/the Conservatives could easily block such a move - but they can't block it forever. If the UK Government were to persistently block another referendum, we could expect to see more and more civil unrest, acts of disobedience etc. and possibly Scotland going down a similar route to Catalonia where independence politicians have even been jailed...

The UK Government called it correctly the last time and allowed a referendum, in the hope that it would legally resolve the question for 'a generation'. At the time, the nationalists had no answers - they had no choice but to suck it up because the referendum result was clear and they lost.

Unfortunately, though, Brexit came and changed everything. Scotland now faces a really tough dilemma, but even as someone who voted against Scottish independence myself, I believe that there is now a very strong case for another referendum and allowing the people of Scotland another chance to decide.

If the UK government decide to block a referendum, then there will be an illegal referendum and that could easily lead down a dangerous path.

The best plan by far would be for the UK government to allow another referendum and put their money where their mouths are.

Of course, a referendum is just the first part of what will be a long and arduous journey for supporters of independence - Scexit will make Brexit look like a walk in the park, so the UK Government may decide that a referendum is the least of their worries and save their energy for beyond that point.

Apologies, guess I missed this thread.

Thanks for the explanation though, cleared things up. Boris definitely isn't gonna let you guys have a vote anytime soon, atleast not before Brexit. If they prolong blocking the vote, I think we'll see a Hong Kong style unrest... Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
 
It is a no-brainer that the EU would love to have an independent Scotland as a member state - I don't think that is even remotely questioned. But the question is, how and when could the EU allow an independent Scotland to become a member state? It is not just a question of political will, but one of political, social and economic reality - Scotland cannot be a member state of the EU until it is itself a nation state...

Perhaps not - I think this could be opposed by Spain and France due to fears over Catalonia wanting to go down the same route.
 
Perhaps not - I think this could be opposed by Spain and France due to fears over Catalonia wanting to go down the same route.
The EU will always permit a new country to enter provided it fulfils the criteria... there’s no way Spain or France or anyone else would or could block an independent Scotland from joining the EU... the EU would and could make life very hard for a blocking member state.

That said, it would entirely depend on the way in which Scottish independence was achieved. If Scotland/SNP goes down the same route as Catalonia (i.e. an illegal referendum), then the EU will not touch Scotland with a ten foot pole. Ironically, Spain would probably agree to Scotland joining the EU if there was a legal referendum on the matter - it is not Scottish independence that they are opposed to, it is the way in which independence is sought.
 
Back