Because it's comical.
Just silly.
Possibly, but unlike the X1, it's not ludicrously ridiculously fictionally fast.The FGT isn't real, should that be removed?
Looks like you missed the part where the X1 went around the majority of corners flat out. You probably won't see that even in an F1 car.Where's the funny part? All I see is a fan car with a body designed for the sole purpose of generating downforce.
1241PenguinLooks like you missed the part where the X1 went around the majority of corners flat out. You probably won't see that even in an F1 car.
Yes, sooooo include it, Prem with every variant too (Pur Sang, Sang Noir, Bleu Centenaire, L'Or Blanc, Vitesse, Black Carbon) plus Grand Sport/Super Sport/Grand Vitesse. UnModifiable too, as adding racing suspension etc to a car perfectly designed
And yes, ALL cars should be modifiable 💡
^ Agreed, adding too many variations makes it no different from the Skyline/Miata/NSX fiasco
In my opinion, only these four variants should be included (since there are enough differences to justify adding them as different versions IMHO):
- EB 16.4 Veyron (original version)
- Veyron Grand Sport (removable top)
- Veyron Super Sport
- Veyron Vitesse (Grand Sport with Supersport engine)
And yes, ALL cars should be modifiable 💡
Oh, so "logically," that's how it should behave.That's because F1 cars don't generate ground affect or weigh 500kg or whatever it is
One Word: AdrianNeweyOh, so "logically," that's how it should behave.
Why don't PD come up with a car that weighs 5kg and has 5000 horsepower. I'm sure some intelligent guy will be able to predict usingassumptionslogic to determine how the car should drive.
Like with too many people using the GT-R's online for their "lack of skill", some people hate the Veyron and X2011 for similar reasons.Why should it not go in?
So you're telling me, they've built one in real life to make assumptions from?One Word: AdrianNewey
Nit-picking at an amateur level.
To me the X2010 is basically the working version of the age old F1 claim that one could generate so much downforce to drive upside down in a tunnel. We'll never know how true it is because nobody will ever try it in real life.
The X2010 is basically the same, it has the performance Red Bull think such a car could perform at but we have no idea if it's true because nobody will ever build and race anything like it in real life. It's already been covered in many threads how a human is unlikely to be able to drive it and how no tyre could live up to that sort of performance for lap after lap.
That's why it has no place in a GT game.
Yes, the X1 is presumably accurate to the limits of the GT5 physics engine. Just like all 1000 other cars.Oh, so "logically," that's how it should behave.
You have no idea how engineering works then?Why don't PD come up with a car that weighs 5kg and has 5000 horsepower. I'm sure some intelligent guy will be able to predict usingassumptionslogic to determine how the car should drive.
FurinkazenVeyron is a luxury supercar. Take that out and its a stupid decision.
Me too. Only since it's a Standard car.I hate the veyron. I haven't used it since I got it.
another_jakholeMe too. Only since it's a Standard car.
Me too. Only since it's a Standard car.
gamerdog6482So you are saying you only use premium cars? That is very closed-minded. Some of the greatest cars in the game are standard.
Like the zonda's
doyley101That's because F1 cars don't generate ground affect or weigh 500kg or whatever it is
VQuickYou sure about that? The new Grand Sport Vitesse brings the variant total up to 23, if memory serves.
Ment most changed and important variance, think that would be 7 then (4 main changes being eb16.4, grand sport, super sport, grand vitesse plus some specials). 8 including Mansory Linea Vincero d'Oro - gold parts against carbon body
earthi think only the "should gt6 have a credit limit" thread is more ridiculous then this