Come one DN, you're joking me, right?
No.
Don't bring in to question peoples driving / track experience, and knowledge.
Why? It's a valid and important factor. Anyone can claim anything, but it doesn't make it true, that's the point.
Why must you defend every valid critisism as soon as it is raised?
I don't, and thus a gross exaggeration, and that's not an opinion either, that's a fact proven by the many threads I have participated in where many people have posted opinions different than my own and expressed criticism that I don't share and yet I have not "defended for or against".
And just because someone claims something to be true doesn't make it valid. You can claim the world is flat... would that claim be valid? Although perhaps we have a different idea on what valid means. I think you'll find most dictionaries will suggest that it means to be grounded in logic or truth or having legal force.
The GT series has long been criticised (by fans of the game, no less) for its poor car sounds.
You left out "some" in front of "fans", and you left out that "some fans" think the opposite is true, and you left out that "some fans" have expressed the exact same criticism of just about every game that has cars in it.... and yet all of that still proves NOTHING... which is exactly the point I made, that apparently rubs you the wrong way.
For me it isn't just about realism, but the effect and feel-good factor when driving. Car sounds in the PC game GT Legends (for example) - despite the engine type - have some passion and life, and can get the hairs on the back of my neck standing on end. How this is measurable for the sake of this arguement, I don't know
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e28e/7e28e189530c7b2ac0718f871c27a4aa5317e89a" alt="Smile :) :)"
Whether or not the cars on GT Legends sound realistic or not I cannot know for sure, but they sound a whole lot more ferocious, thunderous, detailed and life-like.
That's exactly my point. I have no problem what so ever with anyone saying they prefer the sound of cars in one game over another... that's clearly a personal opinion. However to claim one is more realistic than another is an objective opinion and they better have some actual proof and not just claims to back it up, otherwise it most certainly is not valid - and anyone, including myself has every right to challenge the validity of such claims without being attacked for it. Right?
As this all boils down to opinion, as we're talking about variables that cannot be measured (if they could, I'm sure you would have provided us with the statistics by now!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c310/2c3109c0ed51845ec0f0115b046cfbad70f72d8f" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
We should agree to disagree, or perhaps you could prove we're not right?
Actually they can be measured. Every sound has a distinct frequency, wavelength, period, amplitude, intensity, speed, and direction - all of which can be recorded and analyzed. However, I'm not the one making the claim they are accurate or inaccurate, I am mearly pointing out the simple fact so far I have yet to see anyone who claims they are not realistic and that another game is more realistic has offered any proof, other than claims...
And don't get me started about those using internet videos to "prove" their case. Not only has it already been well documented on how unbelievably flawed such a comparison is, but how shocked would you be if I were to show you different videos on YouTube of the same model cars... each sounding differently... and if only one "sound" can be considered realistic, then by definition, even though they are all recording of the same model car, all but one is unrealistic? And if that is the case, how do you know the one you are using to compare to a game is the "realistic" one???
If you still don't believe me about the problem with using recordings of cars on the internet and using them as a basis of what is supposed to be "realistic". I suggest the next time you go to live concert, bring a recorder, and compare what you actually heard to what was recorded... well the reality is that there is no such thing as an accurate recording on YouTube. Even if the original recording was done with absolutely the best possible equipment under the best possible conditions... YouTube and other Internet media sites heavily compress the sound files, and yes, it can in fact change the way a car sounds when compared to what was actually heard in person.
If you really want to get technical, as Polyphony Digital exhibited in some of their BTS videos and interviews, to truly compare and replicate sounds one would have to record them using proper equipment in a controlled environment and compare and replicate the exact same frequencies, wavelengths, periods, amplitudes, intensities, speeds, and directions.
Using Internet videos and recordings as proof of how realistic a sound is, is as flawed as to use Internet videos to prove how good or bad the graphics are in a game... for much of the same reasons, as well as different ones.
Now do you see what I am getting at?
Look, I think we agree that in terms of personal preference, which is largely what you have admitted to in your post, we can all have a difference of opinion, and all be correct. You might prefer the way a car sounds in one game, while I might prefer the way it sounds in a different game, neither of us are wrong.
I think we can also agree that no matter how accurate car sounds are in any game, there will always be some people claiming that they are not accurate at all... but just like now, they also won't have any "valid" proof to back it up.. just claims, and very unscientific and flawed internet videos and recordings... because if recordings of the same model cars on the internet aren't always identical... yet are recordings of the real cars... how on earth can you then assume just because they don't appear to sound the same as in a game they are then assumed to not be realistic. Or in other words, if the real things don't even always sound the same, how can you use that as proof that the game sounds are right or wrong in the event they don't match those specific recordings?
This has absolutely nothing to do with disagreeing with anyone's personal opinion, it has to do with the fact that some people are not just posting a personal opinion, they are suggesting as a point of fact that something is true for which they have offered no valid proof that it is true.
Case in point, if someone told you they drove a few laps, both as a passenger and driver in a stock F430 on Infineon Raceway and told you that from that experience they claim that the F430 in GT5P sounds the same, would you then agree with them?