- 40,823
When you take yourself too seriously.What does being in a crappy film equate to a rapist and murderer?
When you take yourself too seriously.What does being in a crappy film equate to a rapist and murderer?
Not sure Norbit was all that serious, and still dont get how that equates to rape or murder.
Just thinking about the donkey in Shrek is enough to give me the bad kind of goosebumps....You all think Norbit is bad? I suggest that you strongly avoid Pluto Nash, then. That one's even worse. I should know - I had the misfortune of seeing both of them years ago.
Along with Roman Polanski. Let no man say the Academy doesn't respond quickly to criminal convictions over sex acts.Bill Cosby has been expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences - take that Cosby!
I appreciate the irony, as in the Polanski case the response was only four decades after the fact!Along with Roman Polanski. Let no man say the Academy doesn't respond quickly to criminal convictions over sex acts.
Unlikely. It's not like he got away with it and allegations only just surfaced - Polanski was convicted and sent to prison in 1977 for raping a 13-year old girl...Was the delay was due to evolution in morals and values over the period of time?
He may have been "sent", but he didn't go. He claimed to have pled guilty because the prosecutor promised a sentence not involving imprisonment. When the judge thought differently, Polanski fled the US and has lived his superstar playboy life, except never returning to the US.Unlikely. It's not like he got away with it and allegations only just surfaced - Polanski was convicted and sent to prison in 1977 for raping a 13-year old girl...
Except for 7 weeks, when he did - Chino State Prison, for a court-ordered 90-day psychological evaluation following his guilty plea.He may have been "sent", but he didn't go.
Of course. But is there any theory or explanation for the delay in the action of the Academy, other than my suggestion of cultural evolution in morals and values?Except for 7 weeks, when he did - Chino State Prison, for a court-ordered 90-day psychological evaluation following his guilty plea.
He was released after 42 days, then fled the country the day before sentencing after he learned that he was likely to be given a custodial sentence than the probation he had been expecting.
Better late than never, and at least the Academy is showing that it is keeping up with the latest trends!But my question still is, why did the Academy wait 40 years to expel Polanski?
Of course. But is there any theory or explanation for the delay in the action of the Academy, other than my suggestion of cultural evolution in morals and values?
Can you explain the connection between marriage among legally consenting men and women and being 13 years old in a photo session, then plied with booze and quaaludes and then raped? You can also marry and get raped at 21 or 35 or 60.I wonder if it's because child marriage is only just becoming outlawed in some parts of the US. Polanski's rape admission was of statutory rape (implying consent although I don't know if that's accurate). In 1977 they could have been already been married for several years in the US. That would even be true in 2001.
Can you explain the connection between marriage among legally consenting men and women and being 13 years old in a photo session, then plied with booze and quaaludes and then raped?
Are you able to make a post that doesn't involve postmodernism anymore?I will now make the claim that all morals and values were fixed in amber at the beginning of time and no change or evolution has occurred whatsoever.
They are absolute, fixed, certain, unchangeable and apply equally to everyone everywhere at all times, past, present and future. They are not relative and not subjective. This is proof that postmodernism is a hoax.
One suspects that may have been the last one, based on the contents. Take the win.Are you able to make a post that doesn't involve postmodernism anymore?
I will now make the claim that all morals and values were fixed in amber at the beginning of time and no change or evolution has occurred whatsoever.
They are absolute, fixed, certain, unchangeable and apply equally to everyone everywhere at all times, past, present and future. They are not relative and not subjective. This is proof that postmodernism is a hoax.
I have not won. I'm not even winning, though I may be on the path of righteousness. Postmodernism, Cultural Marxism and social engineering is winning, and it's destroying our grasp on consensual reality, rationalism and empiricism. I need more recruits in this cultural battle, and I need to practice and hone my killer rhetoric like I do my fencing actions. Happy is the warrior firm in his cause.One suspects that may have been the last one, based on the contents. Take the win.
Ars gratis artia.But is there any theory or explanation for the delay in the action of the Academy
...demonstrating that art is independent of political and social requirements. But apparently not at the final (9th?) gate.Ars gratis artia.
Albeit in one case the woman was slightly underage.
14 was the legal age of consent in Canada until just a few years ago so 13 would have been slightly under age to give consent throughout most of our history.13 is slightly underage? I guess when you're in your seventies the difference between 13 and 18 seems slight. I assure you that it's not, particularly when the other party is in their 40s and has financial power over the younger.
But by all means, continue to make excuses for drugging and sexually assaulting a 13 year old.
Given the sheer number of his victims, the abhorrent nature of his crimes and the total lack of any remorse that he has shown, it is a shamefully light sentence. Couple that with the fact that the appeals process and legal machinations that he can afford could easily keep him out of jail until he dies, and you have all the makings of a travesty. I only hope that he serves some hard time.